I personally prefer match making. It keeps things a little more balanced and prevents people from kicking you because you are good or are having a bad game.

The only big game with match making is the cod series. Other than that most are userhosted games.

junglist101

All they have to do is disable the option to kick people in ranked matches. E.G. Gears of War.

Some of them. Yeah. Resistance 2, Socom is terrible, MGO too.

Killzone 2 is a server droplist and you pick the server. Much better than the others.

Mr_Ditters

God MGO and Resistance 2 use matchmaking? And I thought if I got a PS3 I might be safe from it.

At least Killzone 2 did it right.

Whats match-making? Sorry, I really am not sure what it is.

Zidaneski

Basically a way to get into an onine game.

For example in Serverlists you get to pick the match you want from a list and get the map you want etc.

With Matchmaking you tell the game to search and it will radomly put you into a game even if it's a map you don't want. Example: COD4

I freakin hate how all the popular games on the 360 are using matchmaking and am wondering is the PS3 also infested?

Google is your friend seriously.

[QUOTE="protoking"]

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] its never a full party though right? basically what will happen is that with 4 you only get matched up against another 4. with 3, sometimes its 3vs3 or they bring in 2 randoms, 1 for each team, so even though ure versing a clan, the other people on your team are most likely in a party themselves

chaoscougar1

That means the pepole on my team decided it would be fun to party up with the suckiest friends they had lol.

*Sigh* even if what you say is true something about it still seems unfair.

I really don't think they should allow parties in RANKED matches, only in "Social" or "Player" matches depending on the game.

How does your rank really reflect your skill if you went prancing around with your General buddies to rank up easier?

Honestly you act like it's crazy but Epic had the same idea with Gears1, Player matches for friends and Ranked for competetive skill. Not "durr lets see how stacked me and my friends can make the teams."

[QUOTE="protoking"]

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] hence my previous statement PARTIES OF 3 AND 4 GET MATCHED UP WITH OTHER PARTIES OF 3 AND 4, parties means that they were in the same lobby together, far out, its not rocket sciencechaoscougar1

Often times they do not, I often find myself versus a group of friends that all have the same icon or clan tags.

That means the pepole on my team decided it would be fun to party up with the suckiest friends they had lol.

*Sigh* even if what you say is true something about it still seems unfair.

I really don't think they should allow parties in RANKED matches, only in "Social" or "Player" matches depending on the game.

[QUOTE="protoking"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] if they dont know who eachother is why are they in a party together? that makes absolutely no sense...

chaoscougar1

Often times they do not, I often find myself versus a group of friends that all have the same icon or clan tags.

[QUOTE="phynixblack"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] u do realise that parties are 3 and 4 on halo are matched up with other parties of 3 and 4?chaoscougar1

I think it was simply an over exagration on his part.

[QUOTE="Godfather3000"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] u do realise that parties are 3 and 4 on halo are matched up with other parties of 3 and 4?chaoscougar1