[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="bluebrad1974"][QUOTE="ramey70"] [QUOTE="bluebrad1974"]Actually, if the Cell isn't being used as the video imaging hardware for ANY blu-ray player or HD video entertainment appliance, you and every other cow and videophile in ths forum needs to explain why your spending $600-$1000 for your movie player? Do a little bit of looking, and you'll ask the same question that I just asked you. Keywords- Cellprocessor imaging blu-raybluebrad1974
1. I'm not a "cow". I have all three systems and depending on the game I'm playing any of them can be my favorite. Right now it's Trauma Center on the Wii.
2. Stand-alone Bluray players are not $600-$1000. Sony and Samsung players are $480 or so new and getting cheaper every day. HD-DVD players can be had for about $250 new. The intial high cost was due to the R&D of the HD formats themselves, like all new technologies. Same with DVD and VHS.
3. I don't have to google anything. I know for a fact the Toshiba line of HD-DVD players use NEC's EMMA LSI chips for all video processing. Stand-alone Bluray drives use an onboard Sigma SMP8630 controller for video imaging (I'm not sure what Denon will be using but it will be similiar I imagine).
It's really a shame that they don't use the Cell (according to your post anyway, and especilly for the price), because theCell is the best video imaging decoder in the mix right now. I'm thinking that the devices you posted are Cell tech, because the Cell is bleeding edge in video imaging.No, it is not Cell tech at all. Sigma is not related to any of the Cell developers and is a simple SoS chip. Here's your official link from the company. Now shut up.
LINK
Until you have a pic or diagram your post is nil on the fact meter.You are beyond help. It's painfully obvious your only intent is to troll.
Log in to comment