then i guess the theory was right, he was forced to retire. hey ken, thanks for the psp.latinrage69

Where in the article is it shown that's why he retired?  Sounds like conjecture on the part of the author. 

[QUOTE="ramey70"]

[QUOTE="elpoep"]ramey70 do we have a wager or do you believe that the PS3 will indeed sell less than the Wii and the XBOX 360 this christmas?elpoep

Absolutely not. I do not have the information to make that kind of judgement, and neither does anyone on this website. Now, if I was forced to guess I would take the Wii. To answer your other question, my way to measure would be to wait until this generation is actually over until we declare a winner. But for some reason people on this forum weren't blessed with the value of patience.

So, you won't take the bet.

Thank you for the OWNAGE you COWard.

So, ramey70 does indeed think the PS3 has failed!!!

Are you insane?  I have zero allegiance to any corporation or their machines.   And in no way do I think the PS3 has "failed".   It has been out for six months.  To declare a winner and a loser right now would be like crowning a Super Bowl champion 5 minutes into the 1st quarter.  

ramey70 do we have a wager or do you believe that the PS3 will indeed sell less than the Wii and the XBOX 360 this christmas?elpoep

Absolutely not.  I do not have the information to make that kind of judgement, and neither does anyone on this website.  Now, if I was forced to guess I would take the Wii.    To answer your other question, my way to measure would be to wait until this generation is actually over until we declare a winner.  But for some reason people on this forum weren't blessed with the value of patience. 

The PS3 has failed. Does anyone want to wager there GS credability it will sell the least of the 3 consoles this Christmas?

 

The loser has to have an "ownage banner" as their sig.

 

Or are you all just COWards?

elpoep

So it's failed if it sells the least amount this Christmas?

[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="p2rus"][QUOTE="TDLlama"]

Wait a second... CNN also projected All Gore to win in 2000. The polls aren't closed on this vote, yet... only a small percentage of precincts are in and it's too close to call right now.

CNN jumping to conclusions? Hehe... yeah.

p2rus

thats different cause al gore did win

you knw

good old majority

Al Gore didn't have a majority in the 2000 election, be it popular vote or electoral college.

http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/prespop.htm

ok just more than any other canidate

That would be a plurality, not a majority.   Even so, it's pointless as the popular vote is meaningless in this country since we use the Electoral College. 

[QUOTE="TDLlama"]

Wait a second... CNN also projected All Gore to win in 2000. The polls aren't closed on this vote, yet... only a small percentage of precincts are in and it's too close to call right now.

CNN jumping to conclusions? Hehe... yeah.

p2rus

thats different cause al gore did win

you knw

good old majority

Al Gore didn't have a majority in the 2000 election, be it popular vote or electoral college.