@CloudYildiz So, because of one review by a single member of the staff, that was done for a game that is very unique and very much an aquired taste didn't get a review you agreed with you decide you can no longer take the entire site seriously?
Tell me this. Has anyone ever taking you seriously?
@Sevenizz @deadpeasant "Is too emotional" What the hell does that mean? I want the people who I come to hear about the games to actually care about the game. His reviews are the most balanced and informative I have ever seen. Your comment that he "only gives high scores to games from Japan is complete and utter B.S. and anyone who has watched his reviews knows that. Go on buddy look up a list of his reviews. You strike me as a petty ignorant and impotent fool who got pissed because he didn't like whatever shitty game you love.
This is a game for a niche type of gamer. The problem is most modern shooter fans do not want a level playing field at all. So, this game will get alot of hate.
Look I am all about unique and creative games but I mean whats the point of this game? Can he even kill you? Is there a quality story? Obviously no combat or RPG like elements. So, basically all you do is walk around and then run around when you see the slender man? I ask again whats the point? I am honestly asking.
@parrot_of_adun @rasputin177 What I have noticed in my life is the first thing non gamers notice when looking at a game is the graphics. They also seem to have the idea that the quality of game is determined by the graphics. If it looks state of the art "they are like wow, awesome game". If it looks like something from the 90s they are much more skeptical. Basically what I have noticed is this. Non gamers think the graphics determine the quality for a game. Good graphics must mean quality game and bad graphics mean low quality. People who play lots of video games no that is not true. So, I am trying to explain to how I feel. Of course there will be exceptions to this rule but you can say that about anything.
@parrot_of_adun @rasputin177 I also don't see where I pulled the "no true" thing you mention. Although I wouldn't have a problem with it. Its pretty simple, any true gamer out there understands that graphics are not the most important aspect of a game. Why? Not because I am trying to be elitest but because real gamers have played great games without great graphics and horrible games with good graphics.
@parrot_of_adun @rasputin177 Your missing the point, you don't seem to have the ability to understand what I am saying so I will spell it out. When I show a game to people who don't normally play games they make an automatic judgement based on graphics. If I show them some classic with bad graphics or an indie game they will often brush it aside as being of "low value". If you show them something with great graphics they assume it must be a "great" game. To understand this I suppose you must have friends who are not gamers so perhaps that is why you didn't understand.
Terraria is the most magical experiance I have had with a game in a long time. Its graphics would not stand out in the mid 90s. Graphics are the way a non gamer judges video games. 60% is B.S, this guy is a salesman not a video game maker.
@meatz666 @rasputin177 How do you know this is going to be a shitty game? Some of the best games I have played of late (Journey, Terraria, Walking Dead, Dungeon Hunter) have all been PSN. The turtles don't as cute. Thats all we really know. Plus, this would be far from the most "shitty" use of the IP.
rasputin177's comments