ropumar's forum posts

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

Perhaps they review the game like is supposed to. They go really deep in the game before posting a review.

Some sites give the game to a guy on a weekened and he brings back a review on monday. The diference betwen the review on gamespot and other sites are outtounsing. I even see some sites where the reviewer stop playing a good game on the midle because wasn't liking it, and destroyed the metacritic for said game.

And I remember sites reviwing Infamous withouth playing as evil and good, saying he just played on good because there was no difference. Which is strange how we would know there is no difference if he never played the other karma spectre.

The gamespot is the best site on reviewing for me, the reviewes stay playing for a long time, no mood swings on a weekend will affect the score of a single game. They discuss internally with other people of staff to see if they are missing something. PLay co-op together, wait for release of retail if the game is online etc.

They even discover bugs and secrets some sites don't even care.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

I blame EA.

Blame EA for no voice chat either.

*remember the infamous historical swarm in EA forum with disgusting pics*

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

@Led_poison

They didn't let Twisted metal die. It started on ps1, had lots of ps2 games and they are bringing TWISTED METAL PS3 soon.

The amount of tips and teases they gave about upcoming twisted metal has been enough for me to know it will sure come.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

Agreed. Reviews were way out of score with this game.

Best arcade racing this gen.

And don't forget 4 player local multiplayer and 12 online.

Is amazing!

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

I have to agree. Sony has the best 1st parties developer.

Only thing Sony doesn't know how to do is build and ride on franchises like nintendo does.

They let franchise like Crash bandicoot, Spyro, Dark Cloud, Alundra, wild arms, Legend of Dragoon, Sly cooper, arc the lad die.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

Nice one TC. So funny how some people didn't got it.

And some still don't.

And is funny cause is true, Tom Mc Shea went to lemmings rescue. Good thing, since I was begging to fell pity towards them.

My 10year cousing was doing a temper tantrum because the ps3 had so many AAAE and he choose the wrong console to buy.

;)

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

N64 had better processor and GPU than Ps1. Ps1 had the upperhand because of storage, the CD had 8x the storage the cartrige had, wich made big games possibles and the use of higher textures and FMV.I would say technically they were on equal fotting, one being more powerfull (n64) and the other offered more possibilities.

The gamecube was again more powerfull than the ps2, slightly, but less powerfull than xbox. But again had less storage, only 1.5gb and the inability to dvd playback was a major draw.

From what I gather Nintendo only pattern is always stay behind in the STORAGE SOLUTION and NEVER offer video playback.

As the wii had still dvd(4.7gb) and only 512 built in memory and can't even play dvd movies. Even the 360 that has outdated storage solution is miles ahead against nintendo.

Nintendo does save money since there is no patent required since doesn't offer the video/dvd/blu-ray playback. But I as consumer think this is being cheap in the wrong places, thus I don't support nintendo since n64.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

I would never pay $250 for a wii more acesories and controllers necessary to use the wii as it should (party console with almost proper control with motion plus)

I would only consider if were $150 and had at least one motion plus bundled. Or $200 if had at least 40gb storage built-in.

The wii at $250 was more overpriced than Ps3 at $600. Now the ps3 is $300 the $250 is bad joke.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

The resolution is the same. The screen is a little bigger only.

If you had the original DS, peharps would have a reason to buy it, but having the Lite, buying the DSi would be a total waste of money if you not a heavy DS user.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

MSG4 and Killzone 2 were way more overhype for PS3.

Halo3,gears of war 2 and GTA4 were more overhyped this generation.

Uncharted 2 wasn't hyped, it just geting recognigtion for it's quality, after review and people actually played.

Is like saying Bioshock was overhyped when all hype came after the quality was already proven.