@LesserAngel @s2i2p2i2o @crazeon Welll, isn't that solveable ? Just say that it takes place a LONG ASS TIME after and only make vague refrences to Shepard and his crew, and not really to what happened. Do you people have any imagination? Plus, the way they handled ther Rachni-queen, Wrex-thingy mission and other shit already negatede the 'value' of the other 2 games.
@LesserAngel @s2i2p2i2o @crazeon Why? Why would it be problematic? I just don't see it.A And this would not be a prequal that really needed to have things to do with the other trilogy, since it just needs to take place in the same universe and not involve any of the old characters. Hell, doesn't need any of the old locations even. Maybe the Citadel is the exception.
@crazeon Wow, how little imagination do you have?! It's a space saga. They can basically just make up a war that took place before that shit or after me3. See, it's as easy as that. Everything takes place in a made-up universe, you can basically make up what ever shit you want and it would make sense. . . Hopefully they don't go the Starwars way nd use one fucking planet over and over again (Tatooine every fucking game it feels like!!).
@SPUDIRL3 @Snaptrap Well, imo what is bad about a game is what descides if it's a buy or not. The negative stuff is the importans stuff in a review IMO.
If you want praise then just look at what the developers put out. They are always good at showing of all the good parts of a game. With a review I actually want to know what parts the hype-factory couldn't deliver.
You will never hear about the retarded AI, short campaign and sloppy multiplayercomponent from the game's developers.
This is not the same as wanting to hear ONLY negative stuff, but those parts are what matters for me.
@kachal how did they fail with the dirst one? It was half-assed made with a relativly low budget and a lot of people liked and bought it. How is that a fail?
s2i2p2i2o's comments