samuraisedge18's forum posts

Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
yea i think it may be just you. I think the ps3 has pretty much matched the xbox 360.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts

[QUOTE="samuraisedge18"]I thougth ps3 sales weren't good for 2008 or fall of 2008. So ps3 can have the best games but that doesn't mean much if people don't buy them.Young_Charter

Okay true but, There is word that the 80GB will drop to 300.00 thats perfect

but, they should just make a Arcade PS3 and make Hard drives on sale..Why ??

Example: What is they had a Backwards compatible PS3 but no hard drive ? OR something.. (Like the Arcade 360 but, better)

Hard drives are less expensive i imagine and nothing compared to the cost of having bc. That's most likely the reason why they upgraded the 40gb models to 80gb. They couldn't make a price drop and they thought maybe by doubling the hard drive they could sell more for the same price. They figured it's not too expensive to double the hard drive. So hard drive are not expensive. bc is. It wouldn't matter if there were no hard drives in an arcade model. The bc would cost much more than the hard drive.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
You can't argue that playing games can be isolating. I'm sure most of us play a lot of games and it does take up a lot of time. Some people say video games are bad because of the content but the most affecting thing about playing games is the hours of playing.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
I thougth ps3 sales weren't good for 2008 or fall of 2008. So ps3 can have the best games but that doesn't mean much if people don't buy them.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
So is the aim like cod or resistance 2 where you have to hold down the button and when you release it it goes back to the hip or is it like resistancce fom where you go into a completely different mode by pressing the button? I hope it's the pressure one. I think it's better when you hold down the button and can quikly zoom in or shoot from the hip. I think the gameplay is much smoother.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
I want to be able to join a non-ranked game. I don't want to just be able to play with people on your friends list. Like whatever resistance has. It would also be cool to have a shotgun attachment and more scopes. If you've played soldier of fortune payback you know that you had a wide variety of sights. Cod4 was a much better game obviously but i loved the customizations of sofp.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
A part of me wants to confirm that mgo sucks but i'm not sure i can say entirely. After mgs4 came out and i finished it i did play mgo a good bit. When i was playing it then i thought it was good but the more i played it the more awful things became. It's so slow. You can't get a kill unless you get a headshot. I'm not taliking about headshot only mode either. Unless they fixed something, it's extremely hard to drain a players health. A lot of lag too. cqc is terrible and pathetic. The fact that the game runs slow makes everything bad about it magnified. It's stupid that you can't shoot at all times, you always have to aim. I think in most 3rd person shooters you still have to aim to get a precise shot but you can still shoot without aiming. The single player was great but i just feel that it doesn't work well for multiplayer.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
When's that zombie game coming?
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
But it is stupid that some games have trophies and some don't. But like some people mentioned, all games released now are supposed to have trophies.
Avatar image for samuraisedge18
samuraisedge18

308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 samuraisedge18
Member since 2007 • 308 Posts
I like the demo. I played it on my cousin's xbox. I think the controls are fine. In fact they implemented the standard controls for most shooters. The L1 or L2 aims(xbox uses the back trigger butons) and R1/R2 is shoot. This is good becasue people will be used to the controls instead of having R1 to aim and then x to shoot. But this could be just another reason for people to pointlessly complain about how it's not classic resident evil.