I can't believe what I am hearing. DS had a better library of games.... Yea if your a 6,7,8 or 9 year old child of course. If you want to play games that were meant for older more mature individuals you played a PSP. I have played both the PSP and DS and personally I thought the DS was junk. The info on PSP2 is very limited at the moment and people are already saying it has low battery life. What you think 3DS with it holographic 3D screen isn't going to chew up battery life..Come on lets be serious. PSP2 will have better games that will run smooth unlike the 3DS which will probably be slow or get bogged down since its hardware specs are outdated. Who wouldn't want a handheld that gives you close to PS3 graphics?? 3DS isn't coming close to that I promise you. PSP2 will be 3G 3DS isn't capable of handeling that kind of internet speed. When you look at both of the machines specs side by side and compare the PSP2 blows the 3DS out of the water. The only thing 3DS has is its holographic 3D screen which I havent seen in person yet to say it is the game changer. To say or act like PSP2 won't have good games is ignorant.

3DS will most likely have more games cause it is releasing sooner. But this notion that the DS is the best portable is laughable considering it still hasnt passed the PSP in sales yet and even if it does that doesn't make PSP a failure at all. 60 million units sold is anything but a failure. Nintendo can have all the young kids in the world so they can pet their 3D animals and color their 3D castles magical colors and play another port of the same Zelda gamethat has come out twice already. I'll wait for the system with 5 inch OLED screen procressor and GPU speeds that push the handheld envelope farther than anything to date including smartphones and tablet cpu's by a BIG margin. The iphone 4 and android phones are using 1gig processors the PSP2 will have quadcore processor where each core puts out no less than 1.5 gig and a GPU thats also multi core. This is all news just released today. Im sorry but 3DS will be outclasses once PSP2 is out.

Amount of characters doesnt have everything to do with it either. SFIV was as unbalanced a game as there coul be but Super SF IV was very balanced compared to SFIV. Blazblue is just an incredible game mae by a company that put alot of attention to detail and the fighting system. BlazBlue is as deep a fighting game as there is out there right now but friendly enough that a person who has never played can pick up the controler and do decent at the game. The learning curve was that bad to become ok but it takes alot of time to become great and really get the deeper partsof the fighting system. MVC3 to me looks like it was be a good game. IF capcom can balance 36 character that is impressive. For me seeing Haggar announced is worth the price of the game. It is long overdue forhim to be part of a fighting game. As far as Venom goes he isn't one of my favorite characters and I would much rather see She-Hulk.

KOF is a great series of games no doubt but I think it lacks the balance that Street Fighter has especially SSFIV. KOF maybe a little faster gameplay wise but not much. The only thing KOF does have is its easier to pull of moves but SF in my opinion is more rewarding when you pull of a move than it is in KOF. As Far as amount of moves I think its roughly the same characters in SSFIV have plenty of moves and combos.

Everyone has there own opinion on what is the best fighter out there. Personally I love SF SSFIV to be exact. I think it has the balance that SF IV lacked a phenomenal character roster and wide variety of styles you can choose from with the fighters. Tekken 6 is a great game and I play that as well but it is a very different type of fighter in its style and 3D renderings. Some people like the 2D stlye fighters where it makes it harder to flee you opponent. Some like tekken and virtua fighter 5 for its 360 degree movement it s matter or preferance. I like the 2D style better SF and the SNK games like Fatal Fury and KOF series of games. Not to say Tekken virtua fighter, DOA Or Soul calibur games arent good cause they are but they are different. Realism doesnt apply to any of the above games if you want real fighting go buy the UFC 2010 game which is more of a simulation type fighter.

Darksiders is nothing like GOW3,DMC,Dantes Inferno or Bayonetta it is a darker more violent zelda like game. Open world exploration Dungeon action adventure game. Its combat may look like GOW3 but its a much deeper game cause its not just about combat.

OMG why do people insist upon comparing Darksiders to God of War and Dante's Inferno?? Darksiders is nothing like them it is basically a darker more violent version of Zelda. It has more types of weapons, add ons that can increase attack or defense, potions that give you an array of different abilities, a havoc Mode where War tranforms into a huge Red and Black demon like Hulk that can kill anything with a couple blows which is why you can only use for a limited time. War also has 5 or 6 super devastating specialattacks. Darksiders isnt linear like DMC or Bayonetta, God or War or Dantes Inferno. This game was made for the player to EXPLORE THE ENVIORMENT something the other games people are comparing darksiders to dont make you do. It is so much like Zelda you even get a horse called Ruin to ride who you need in certain areas in order to beat them. Then you have the puzzle parts of the game. Oh and who said the charred cousil are just a bunch of talking stone skulls??? We dont know just what the charred counsil is yet but we know they are extremly powerful beings that help keep balance between heaven and hell so neither one gets to powerful. They bound the watcher to War who is powerful enough to kill War if he doesnt listen and do what he is supposed to. Another things that sets Darksiders apart from God of War is there are no QTE in Darksiders but instead cinematic endings. If you dont like the idea of the game thats one thing but dont make up stuff about a game you really know nothing about. This game has been in development for close to 3 years the guys at vigil are trying to make a great game save you judgement until after you have played it.

gotta be honest I recently sold my 360 and bought PS3 because I want to play killzone 1 and 2 as well as Resistance 1 and 2 just to name a couple.

I bought my PS3 because of the combination of the Blu ray player and the games. I had a Xbox 360 and I loved it but the PS3 has the best blu ray player you can get plus basically all the same games except for gears of war which is an awesome game but I played and have both of them and beat both games already.

What causes this red ring of death? I have had my 360 for quite some time almost two years and nothing has happened yet. knock on wood!!!!