shahilsyed's forum posts

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

I cant fuc!king believe it but this thread is the worst thread I've read in a while even though this isnt serious. The TC lacks knowledge, trolling and is a complete fuc!king dumbas! and ShadowMoses go fuc!king troll with your Sony bullcrap somewhere else. Homo.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="arsenal262"]

you are an utter dumbass.

arsenal262

Same goes for you, you are a dumbass. You just cannot accept the common gamer's opinion. BF3 is horribly unbalanced, no skill required. It's just, go into the jet and dominate the game. At least in MW3, you have to work for your rewards. Dumbf!ck.

I am a casual gamer but your reasoning is just terrible. You say its takes no skill but then complain how you die too easily. Have you flown a jet or heli, its not easy to stay up with all the people shooting at you. Just admit it, your so used to cod that the change to something that is a bit slower and more realistic is too much for you. Its alright. Dumbass, dumbass, dumbass( sorry its just funny that you dont get modded for saying it).:lol:

Yeah dumbass, learn to spell 'you're'. You have bad grammar. Anyway, I've flown a jet many times and it just feels easy, I can get my teamates to spawn on the vehicle as a gunner and the game would be a total joke and we would dominate. And you obviously dont get it.....Do you? BF3 is way easy because the damage and the health you have is restricted, if I have a RPK. I can easily spray down couple of times and I could win. In COD, there are strategies like drop shotting to win gun fights.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Listen, I know people that are terrible at videogames too. Its alright, if you can't play a game unless the opponents are mentally handicapped pre teens in a setting designed so anyone can succeed (such as yourself), then hey, you like MW3 more then BF3 and that's your opinion.

Though, I rarely meet someone so bad at a game they flip out at it and explode about how unbalanced it is and vehicles and blah blah blah instead of not playing an obviously too hardcore for them game.

SPYDER0416

Wow...You're clever......I have a K/D of 1.41 on BF3and W/L of 1.21 which proves I am clearly not ranting because of my skill level. I just think BF3 is poorly designed. Horrible Campaign + Bad Co-Op mode + Decent Multiplayer which is unbalanced = $60.....Er........Overpriced,Eh?

ONLY a 1.41? That you can't even prove?

Man, and I thought my grandpa was bad at BF3.

Now you are obviously exaggerating, I dont consider myself a pro at BF. I only played BC2 and BF1943 and I hardly even play BF because it's bad. I dont master everything like you probably do. 1.41 is outstanding for someone like me. I'm not really fussed. ANd I love how you ignore my Winn/Loss..... You're probably butthurt that a COD player has a positive K/D and a W/L ratio.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Guys, lets not play the "skill" card. MW3 has perks and killstreaks, and though it might TAKE some skill, its as easy as memorizing a good camp spot.

BF3 is the same. Sure you might need some skill and teamwork, but one spawn killing jerk with a jet on Rush can destroy anyone else provided he has some flares (and since other players don't start with flares, its not exactly fair or skill reliant if one naturally can avoid seeking missiles right?)

The only game that I think might be as close to 100% skill based might be the Counter Strike games, but even then I feel like some maps have some perfect and impossible to find camp spots (as most games would have somewhere, sadly), and though grenades aren't the most useful things ever, I can shamefully attest to an ill gotten kill with them, so there really isn't a perfect 100% skill based game, and people should stop saying "oh game x needs more skill then game y so its better".

I just care if the game is fun and balanced, with some focus on skill or teamwork (or both). Honestly though, if its fun and not frustrating, I'll be glad.

SPYDER0416

BF3 is not balanced at all. Within 2 bullets, you're dead. At least in COD, you can sponge more bullets but BF3 is utterly not balanced. Tanks, Helicopters, Jets have a huge advantage and RPG/Stinger are horrible in taking out vehicles. I can't believe BF3 was so hyped but the final product came out as a total sh!t.

Listen, I know people that are terrible at videogames too. Its alright, if you can't play a game unless the opponents are mentally handicapped pre teens in a setting designed so anyone can succeed (such as yourself), then hey, you like MW3 more then BF3 and that's your opinion.

Though, I rarely meet someone so bad at a game they flip out at it and explode about how unbalanced it is and vehicles and blah blah blah instead of not playing an obviously too hardcore for them game.

Wow...You're clever......I have a K/D of 1.41 on BF3and W/L of 1.21 which proves I am clearly not ranting because of my skill level. I just think BF3 is poorly designed. Horrible Campaign + Bad Co-Op mode + Decent Multiplayer which is unbalanced = $60.....Er........Overpriced,Eh?
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Guys, lets not play the "skill" card. MW3 has perks and killstreaks, and though it might TAKE some skill, its as easy as memorizing a good camp spot.

BF3 is the same. Sure you might need some skill and teamwork, but one spawn killing jerk with a jet on Rush can destroy anyone else provided he has some flares (and since other players don't start with flares, its not exactly fair or skill reliant if one naturally can avoid seeking missiles right?)

The only game that I think might be as close to 100% skill based might be the Counter Strike games, but even then I feel like some maps have some perfect and impossible to find camp spots (as most games would have somewhere, sadly), and though grenades aren't the most useful things ever, I can shamefully attest to an ill gotten kill with them, so there really isn't a perfect 100% skill based game, and people should stop saying "oh game x needs more skill then game y so its better".

I just care if the game is fun and balanced, with some focus on skill or teamwork (or both). Honestly though, if its fun and not frustrating, I'll be glad.

arsenal262

BF3 is not balanced at all. Within 2 bullets, you're dead. At least in COD, you can sponge more bullets but BF3 is utterly not balanced. Tanks, Helicopters, Jets have a huge advantage and RPG/Stinger are horrible in taking out vehicles. I can't believe BF3 was so hyped but the final product came out as a total sh!t.

you are an utter dumbass.

Same goes for you, you are a dumbass. You just cannot accept the common gamer's opinion. BF3 is horribly unbalanced, no skill required. It's just, go into the jet and dominate the game. At least in MW3, you have to work for your rewards. Dumbf!ck.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

I think Treyarch makes overall better games than IW. Their stories are a little more cohesive and interesting. Zombies > Spec Ops by 1000%, and Treyarch's MP feels better, though it is laggier than the already laggy IW games.

I'd say BO>MW3, but both are < just about any other FPS.

Pug-Nasty
Agreed.COD4 was the last stretch for IW. Treyarch are doing pretty decent and hoping for a sequel for Black Ops.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="arsenal262"]

No sh!t you used him as an analogy, bf3 does not suck I like cod too but the fact you say bf3 is for people who cant play cod makes me sick. Bf3 is 100 times more difficult than any cod (my k/d will show this). You are just stupid even commenting on the bf3 as you've probably never played it, ever tried taking a chopper up? Yea, well you'll get shot down very quickly without experience, unlike cod where your chopper is an unstoppable tank in the air.

SPYDER0416

BF3 is mainly just camping, no skill required. It's just random dudes running around with tanks and with no skill. COD actually requires skill where you have to earn KS.

Guys, lets not play the "skill" card. MW3 has perks and killstreaks, and though it might TAKE some skill, its as easy as memorizing a good camp spot.

BF3 is the same. Sure you might need some skill and teamwork, but one spawn killing jerk with a jet on Rush can destroy anyone else provided he has some flares (and since other players don't start with flares, its not exactly fair or skill reliant if one naturally can avoid seeking missiles right?)

The only game that I think might be as close to 100% skill based might be the Counter Strike games, but even then I feel like some maps have some perfect and impossible to find camp spots (as most games would have somewhere, sadly), and though grenades aren't the most useful things ever, I can shamefully attest to an ill gotten kill with them, so there really isn't a perfect 100% skill based game, and people should stop saying "oh game x needs more skill then game y so its better".

I just care if the game is fun and balanced, with some focus on skill or teamwork (or both). Honestly though, if its fun and not frustrating, I'll be glad.

BF3 is not balanced at all. Within 2 bullets, you're dead. At least in COD, you can sponge more bullets but BF3 is utterly not balanced. Tanks, Helicopters, Jets have a huge advantage and RPG/Stinger are horrible in taking out vehicles. I can't believe BF3 was so hyped but the final product came out as a total sh!t.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="arsenal262"]

Watch your language with me you little f!ck. You obviously love justin bieber to say he's better than bf3. Black ops is better.

arsenal262

Why dont you watch your language? You clearly swore back at me. And I dont 'love' justin bieber. I used him in my analogy to prove that Battlefield 3 is worse than justin bieber. And you clearly are a dumbass. BF3 is a horrible game made for people who cant play COD. BF Player: Oh no, a helicopter just respawned here so I guess I'll grab one *dominates everything* COD player: Oh no, I have to actually earn my helicopter first before I use.......

No sh!t you used him as an analogy, bf3 does not suck I like cod too but the fact you say bf3 is for people who cant play cod makes me sick. Bf3 is 100 times more difficult than any cod (my k/d will show this). You are just stupid even commenting on the bf3 as you've probably never played it, ever tried taking a chopper up? Yea, well you'll get shot down very quickly without experience, unlike cod where your chopper is an unstoppable tank in the air.

BF3 is mainly just camping, no skill required. It's just random dudes running around with tanks and with no skill. COD actually requires skill where you have to earn KS.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

MW3! black ops was garbage

finalstar2007

Oh......Did Treyarch hurt you by removing quickscoping?

I dont even snipe to begin with :|, i'v always enjoyed the modern warfare games more than what treyach makes, black ops was my least played CoD game

Yes because Black Ops was really hard to exploit, glitch and hack into. MW games are instantly found exploits. People already found exploits on MW3.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

MW3! black ops was garbage

finalstar2007
Oh......Did Treyarch hurt you by removing quickscoping?