[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="arsenal262"]

Do me a favour and go join the club of queers.

arsenal262

Watch your language with me you little f!ck. You obviously love justin bieber to say he's better than bf3. Black ops is better.

I thought Black Ops had a better and longercampaign, but they are both pretty good in mulitplayer. MW3 campaign is good too, just too short and it has no zombies, but it does have spec ops so that makes up for it. I do miss the WW2 COD games though, wish they would make a new one.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

Lol at Lag Compensation. I prefer Black Ops though both beats Battlefield 3.

Justin Bieber > Battlefield 3

arsenal262

Do me a favour and go join the club of queers.

How is Black Ops slow paced?

Lol at Lag Compensation. I prefer Black Ops though both beats Battlefield 3.

Justin Bieber > Battlefield 3

Which game do you prefer and why?

MW3 or Black Ops?

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"] [QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

I have BF3 and rented MW3, and I can't think of anything that MW3 does better than BF 3 other than partying up. Visually and sound wise, MW3 is a 2007 game. The weapons feel like BB guns in use, and the health is way too low in MP.

Additionallly, the online is laggy and the maps are awful.

BF3 has its share of problems, but the core game is solid, which is something I can't say for any CoD this gen since WaW, which still suffered from awfully laggy online.

Pug-Nasty

Lol, How is MW3 a 2007 game? MW3 has way new things, new survival mode, new campaign, new attachments, guns, maps, challenges, features, strike packages, emp grenades, new killstreaks. That is enough to warrant a new game. MW3 is more fun, in BF3 I would at least have to invest hours before I get any fun. In MW3, its pick up and have fun. And the online being laggy has nothing got to do with the game, its your connection. And I thought people say BF3 is good for realism, if the health is too low in MP, it just proves that you are just being a fanboy of BF3.

Answered in the post you quoted.

Realism is not an accolade I would give to BF, but rather the objective, team-based gameplay that discourages lone wolf behavior. MAG had similar attributes, though completely different gameplay. CoD is just a K/D ratio game, and the online being laggy has to do with everyone's connection, because it's a peer to peer game.

I have BF3 and rented MW3, and I can't think of anything that MW3 does better than BF 3 other than partying up. Visually and sound wise, MW3 is a 2007 game. The weapons feel like BB guns in use, and the health is way too low in MP.

Additionallly, the online is laggy and the maps are awful.

BF3 has its share of problems, but the core game is solid, which is something I can't say for any CoD this gen since WaW, which still suffered from awfully laggy online.

Pug-Nasty