[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

[QUOTE="tirralirra"]

Yeah, but at bigger tv sizes, it is harder to differentiate between 720p and 1080p. note, 'on a tv that size' People's reading skills here are poor, you may as well be illiterate.

tirralirra

Well duh! Differentiate is a word that implies subjectivity though. Of course the difference is the same, why wouldn't it be, im say that the difference is less ovbious on the bigger screen.

[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] That's funny since it's almost impossible to tell the different between 1080p and 720p on a tv that size. It's not native 1080p.tirralirra

Yeah, but at bigger tv sizes, it is harder to differentiate between 720p and 1080p. note, 'on a tv that size' People's reading skills here are poor, you may as well be illiterate.

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

It's 720p... I just proved that to you :?

Wow.

Chutebox

Just PS3 fanboys opinions.

I have buy the game on the 360 and the different between 720p and 1080p is big.The game look a lot better in 1080p on my SAMSUNG 46'' LCD TV.

[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"] IGN AU:Assassin's Creed II AU Review "In terms of engine quality, however, the difference between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions is literally night and day. Starting with the shocking difference in contrast and colour depth, the Xbox 360 version's high-dynamic range lighting is more intense and casts deeper shadows and renders a darker night. In our direct comparisons between the two games, the PS3 version looks noticeably flatter and more washed out, detracting from the ambience. The PS3 version also suffers from a lower texture resolution, which affects everything from facial details (you can see freckles and pores on the 360, but faces, lips and hair looks almost universally blurry on PS3), to wall and ground textures, leaves and particle and debris effects." XBOX360: "NEC designed eDRAM die includes additional logic (192 parallel pixel processors) for color, alpha compositing, Z/stencil buffering, and anti-aliasing called "Intelligent Memory" (eDRAM), giving developers 4-sample anti-aliasing at very little performance cost. XBOX360 has better graphics with smoother frame rate and this is natural, because it has better graphics card. The graphics doesn't depend much in the power of CPU rather than the power of GPU." The XBOX360 is graphic better than PS3.And all we can see that on Assassin's Creed 2.Panosola

AC2 on 360 in 1080p.....

I don't have anything else to say......

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

"Let's deal with the basic rendering spec. Similar to the first Assassin's Creed, ACII runs at native 720p resolution, with 2x multi-sampling anti-aliasing on Xbox 360 and quincunx edge-smoothing on PS3. The net result is that the PS3 has fewer "jaggies" at the expense of every texture in the game getting an unwelcome blur."

Eurogamer comparison

360 is superior, but not rendered in 1080p.

Panosola

A lot of people in this thread are talking out of there behind.

Both the Xbox 360 and PS3 can produce native 1080p 1920 x 1080 gameplay.

Both the Xbox 360 and PS3 have very little native 1080p 1920 x 1080 games, with last time I checked the PS3 having slightly more.

The Xbox 360 has hardware upscaling, so all games can be upscaled to 1080p.

The PS3 has software upscaling which is left to developers, the PS3 can upscale to 1080p.

Regardles of which upscales better, all 1080p 1920 x 1080 TV's/Monitors will be upscaling the image to the native resolution of the screen. So the argument is rather moot.

The PS3 can only play CERTAIN games at 1080p. those are the games that look worse than most others. games with better graphics display ONLY at 720p & will not be upscaled. The 360 upscales to 1080p if the game doesnt have native 1080p support. THERE ARE GAMES OUT there for the 360 that support native 1080p aswell. True 1080p refers to the rez. it doesnt matter whether the game has been upscaled or not , as long as the rez is 1080p its true 1080p. Native 1080p is a different story. BOTH PS3 & 360 are capable of NATIVE 1080p the only difference is that 360 can upscale its 720p games to 1080p while the PS3 cannot. Most of the PS3's games are displayed in 720p not 1080p and this is the same with the 360, But unlike the PS3 the 360 can upscale while the PS3 is stuck with 720p ONLY and no upscaling. Im not taking any sides here. the reason the PS3 cant upscale is beause it lacks a good framebuffer chip like the 360's, other than that the hardware is perfectly capable of running a software upscaler. Plz do not spread false information. Youtube is not a good source of information for these things because it is plagued with fanboys who trick people like you into thinking their system is the only one that has a specific feature. Kinda like how apple tricked their customers into thinking only macs can dualboot multiple OS's. Once again i repeat myself for clarity

360

plays native 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480i

can upscales game that do not have native 1080p support to a 1920x1080p resolution

has games that support 1080p and does not need upscaling

PS3

plays native 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480i

cannot upscale games that do not have native 1080p support to a 1920x1080p resolution

has games that support native 1080p, but cannot upscale games that support only 720p

Wii (added this so u know it can, but has been disabled)

has hardware to display at 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480i, but 1080p & 720p have been locked by a software code.

painguy1

I have a Samsung T240HD and its brilliant.

if you buy anything under 42" you wont see a difference if you bought a 1080p but you will see a difference if you buy a tv which is 50" 1080p.

sukraj

[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

[QUOTE="Myzz617"] of course there is

Myzz617