[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

[QUOTE="Myzz617"]

This has been dead and gone why revive it? OO you want to get your post count higher I see!!!

Myzz617

[QUOTE="gamer082009"]

[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

Whats my level got to do with anything. I joined this site long before you did, I just dont visit it much. If thats your attitude, its a wonder your still here.

Getting back to the point, you clearly have no clue what your talking about. Please explain how a screen of 22" 1920 x 1080 is any different to a screen of 60" 1920 x 1080.

To save you any embarrasment, Ill do it myself. There is no difference. They both have the same amount of pixels. The smaller the screen, the closer the pixels hence the closer you need to sit or can sit. If you sit the same distance at a 60" screen, then them pixels are further apart hence you would be able to see the pixels hence why you need to sit further away from the bigger screen. As I said before, resolution is fixed, 1080p doesnt change just because screen size does.

Before you go round accusing people of not knowing what they are taking about, do a bit more research of the subject on hand and also how long the poster has been signed up, not that if I had 10000 posts would matter, amount of posts dont relate to knowledge.

Myzz617

This has been dead and gone why revive it? OO you want to get your post count higher I see!!!

haha... wow, actually, the industry has set standard viewing distance for their needs.. look it up, and its 1080p, not 1090, so dont talk if you don't know what you are talking about. Lastly, I was simply explaining to the kid that he would be fine with getting a 32 inch tv without worrying about 1080p because unless he is a moron sitting a foot away, he can't see the enlarged pixels, which at 32 1080p and 720 difference is not discernable... sorry if you don't agree. the whole monitor question shouldn't even be considered because every monitor is at a high resolution. He asked about tvs, not monitors.

tamabeast04

it doesn't take a genious to deduce that as the screen size gets bigger... and the pixel amount stays the same... the pixels are stretched, so to say a 60" looks the exact same as a 22" is misleading... they will only look the same at viewing distances which are relative... for a 22 inch monitor... about 1 foot... for a 60" about 8 feet

tamabeast04

i can't believe you are still not getting what we are saying... yes, there are just as many pixels, no question... but that does NOT change the fact that at 5 to 6 feet away... a person cannot tell the difference between 1080p and 720p... were are not talking about sitting 12 inches away from a computer monitor... and here is the big kicker... most hd tvs have better processing than monitors anyway... so the picture quality will generally look better (this defintely does not apply in general, ie vizio...). So yes, there is no difference between a 22" and a 60" AS FAR AS THE AMOUNT of pixels... but when you look at a 32" 720p and a 32" 1080p... you can NOT tell the difference; this isn't even opinion, it's scientific fact... go onto cnet.

tamabeast04

oh and lcd monitors at that size (21.6-24) will always be 1080p because they go up to 2500x1600 most of the time for computer use... if you are talking about a lcd tv at 1080p... then just like a computer monitor you will be sitting pretty close, which doesn't seem fun.... on the other hand, if he were to get a solid 32 inch, he could sit back and play, and he wouldn't need to worry about 1080p because unless you are super close (like a foot or less) then, you notice a difference, otherwise no... even with supereyes...??tamabeast04

it's not wrong that there are the same amount of pixels, but the fact is that on a 22 inch the pixels are smaller; PLUS the human factor. At the normal viewing range of a 32 inch (about 5-6 feet) and the range of say a 46 inch (6-7 feet) you can NOT tell the difference between 720 p and 1080p... what you CAN tell the difference between is a crap tv and a good tv...

This also applies to motion processing (can't tell the difference between 240hz and 120hz... dont care what anyone says... not humanly possible...

tamabeast04

I would stay away from vizio, their picture accuracy is way off... go onto bluray.com and into the forum section, very informative. The sony has better response, depending on the model, which is important for ps3. As far as 1080p... the human eye cannot tell (at a normal distance) between 1080 and 720 for I would say anything up to 32 inch... I can personally attest to this because when trying to find a new tv (which I have given up on...) I bought the top of the line samsung conventional lcd - the 46b750, and as far as picture quality, no difference between 1080 on the 46 inch and 720 on my samsung 32 inch, and I am extremely nit-picky. The vizio's are economy tvs, that's why they are so popular... if you want a good tv, stick with a sony, or a samsung (at 32 without the video processing, you won't have the issue of input lag) - you can get either for a decent price at 32 inch no problem; just do yourself a favor and stick to a major company, not vizio or some other walmart brand...

tamabeast04

[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

[QUOTE="JoKeR_421"] yea wait till black friday, here wal-mart has a 40 inch sony bravia for $649.99! by the way dont worry about the 1080p if ur tv is less than 40in, u wont notice any difference between 720p and 1080p on a 32in. so get the sony one if i was u, if u want a 1080p tv its best to get it 40in or moreJoKeR_421

[QUOTE="shawty1984"]

[QUOTE="jimm895"]At the size your looking at the 1080p isn't gonna make much of a difference if any. 1080p really doesn't look much different than 720p until the TV size reachs about 40 inchs then as the size goes up the differences show up more.JoKeR_421