sheeprcute's forum posts
[QUOTE="whipassmt"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="inzombiak"][QUOTE="jointed"]The first gangsters in America were white...
But if you're talking about the ones who dress as if they're from Darfur, then well....just ignore them. That's unfortunately the best advice I can give.
jointed
they were also irish and italian
Well, the Irish and Italians = white
in the 1800s and early 1900s Irish, Italians, Jews, and Poles were considered separate races from white people.What? :lol: They're all Europeans...Caucasians.
Caucasians are people who live in the caucas mountain region. Like azerbijan or georgia. No way at all Europeans
[QUOTE="sheeprcute"][QUOTE="DeeJayInphinity"][QUOTE="sheeprcute"]I highly doubt any scientist has ever proposed the idea that you mentioned earlier. That idea is in no way compatible with any scientific theory in existence.Please explain to me how I am misrepresentating your opinion.
Gamer556
Im referring to the big bang theory. You do realize this is the most widely accepted theory of chance creation.
It is an observable fact that the universe is expanding from a single point.
And this some how proves that everything that we know came out of a rotating speck.
[QUOTE="sheeprcute"][QUOTE="DeeJayInphinity"][QUOTE="sheeprcute"]I highly doubt any scientist has ever proposed the idea that you mentioned earlier. That idea is in no way compatible with any scientific theory in existence.Please explain to me how I am misrepresentating your opinion.
DeeJayInphinity
Im referring to the big bang theory. You do realize this is the most widely accepted theory of chance creation.
And you do realize you misrepresented it, right? Hence the "straw man fallacy" response. Woah.Answer my question. How am Misrepresentating it. Please explain this to me instead of repeating yourself. As I said earlier I was reffering to the big bang theory. I dont realize how I am misrepresentating it could you please spell it out for me. I dont understand your point.
[QUOTE="sheeprcute"]I highly doubt any scientist has ever proposed the idea that you mentioned earlier. That idea is in no way compatible with any scientific theory in existence.Please explain to me how I am misrepresentating your opinion.
DeeJayInphinity
Im referring to the big bang theory. You do realize this is the most widely accepted theory of chance creation.
[QUOTE="mindstorm"]God has always been. He is the Alpha, the Omega, the Beginning, and the End. He is the great I am, he is who he is. There is nothing comparable to him. God had no creator nor did he need to create.Deity_Slapper
I must ask you - according to you guys (christians), we humans are too complex to have happened by chance. So how could the EVEN MORE COMPLEX creator have just happened by chance? Aren't you discrediting your own theory of complexity requiring a designer? :?
The creator did not happen by chance..... No where in the bible does it even hint at that or imply that.:|
[QUOTE="123625"][QUOTE="DeeJayInphinity"]They have that cute little cop-out; "god has always been."DeeJayInphinity
Cop out? How so?
That's just your assumption based on nothing.[QUOTE="DeeJayInphinity"][QUOTE="sheeprcute"]Straw man fallacy.. try harder next time.In school my biology teacher insists that the world exploded from a tiny dot that was flying through nothingness. Wth i fail to see any scientific "evidence" on how anyone could come to this conclusion.
sheeprcute
wth is that?
Here you go.. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=Kjk&q=straw+man+argument&btnG=SearchPlease explain to me how I am misrepresentating your opinion.
[QUOTE="sheeprcute"]Straw man fallacy.. try harder next time.In school my biology teacher insists that the world exploded from a tiny dot that was flying through nothingness. Wth i fail to see any scientific "evidence" on how anyone could come to this conclusion.
DeeJayInphinity
wth is that?
Log in to comment