I'm happy to consider positive feelings axiomatically good and negative feelings axiomatically bad, and it thus follows that any action which increases total positive feelings is good and any action which decreases total negative feelings is bad. This is, of course, independent of social mores.
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="sigh-_-"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"] Yeah...Any other inane information you would like to add to your already derailed thread? Yes, I'd like to highlight the fact that in 3 pages of wasting my time over a minor figure, you've not once found it within you admit that you were wrong about it. That is all. You wasted your own time by arguing it. Instead of actually doing ANYTHING to further your thread, all you did was respond to that part of my post, in a vain attempt to find a flaw in my argument since you couldn't argue anything else. And still, you can't admit that you were wrong about the number. Because that's what this all comes down to - if you, even once, had the humility (so much for Christian virtue!) to admit that, this wouldn't have gone on so long. Anyway, it's 4AM and I'm going to bed.
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="sigh-_-"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"] Ah, Insults...You didn't address any points I made. All you did was argue whether or not "700" was the correct number or not. Stop insulting my intelligence please, you're not making yourself look any better. Except that I did, by demonstrating that your claim to have reiterated the figure in your link was a lie, because you misquoted it. And don't worry - I don't see any need to insult your intelligence; you're doing that job yourself. Yeah...Any other inane information you would like to add to your already derailed thread? Yes, I'd like to highlight the fact that in 3 pages of wasting my time over a minor figure, you've not once found it within you admit that you were wrong about it. That is all.
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="sigh-_-"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"] No, I didn't "Launch" it. I pointed out what I read in my Link, I even reiterated that was the figure I saw in my link. Seriously now. I'm glad you find your attempts enjoyable as well. Now, If you please. Oh dear. You made the same dishonest excuse for an argument and - on this very page! - I pointed out: 'You didn't even do that - it said 'over 700', which was right, and you stated '700', which was wrong. Misreading your own source - bravo.' Debating people who have the memory of a goldfish isn't my thing, and I'm fed up of going round in circles with your endless chain of lies, so - goodnight. Ah, Insults...You didn't address any points I made. All you did was argue whether or not "700" was the correct number or not. Stop insulting my intelligence please, you're not making yourself look any better. Except that I did, by demonstrating that your claim to have reiterated the figure in your link was a lie, because you misquoted it. And don't worry - I don't see any need to insult your intelligence; you're doing that job yourself.
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"] No, I didn't "Launch" it. I pointed out what I read in my Link, I even reiterated that was the figure I saw in my link. Seriously now. I'm glad you find your attempts enjoyable as well. Now, If you please. Oh dear. You made the same dishonest excuse for an argument and - on this very page! - I pointed out: 'You didn't even do that - it said 'over 700', which was right, and you stated '700', which was wrong. Misreading your own source - bravo.' Debating people who have the memory of a goldfish isn't my thing, and I'm fed up of going round in circles with your endless chain of lies, so - goodnight.
You were actually the one that launched this whole "Number" argumentSnipes_2
First disagreement over the number:
And 700 audience members voted differently, not 800Snipes_2
You launched it. Game over. edit: 'you're [sic] attempts to wriggle out of actually backing up your claims were also quite Enjoyable [sic] to say the least,' he says, just as I do so. Bahahaha.
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="sigh-_-"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"] You form no arguments, I'm not letting you get the last word in either. You make a thread claiming Catholicism is teh Evilz and do nothing but focus on a Number that I posted :lol:Oh dear oh dear. Refer to my previous post demonstrating that you are the one responsible for kicking up a fuss about the number, not I. Now, for most people I'd be quite happy to debate the issue, but after the pitiful display you've put on for us tonight, I have no interest in arguing with you over it. Why? Because I don't like liars and I don't like debating with liars. You have lied repeatedly over what I have said, what you have said and how much research you've done, and frankly I have no desire to debate someone capable of stooping to the lows of mendacity that you have demonstrated yourself to be capable of. No doubt you'll continue your pathetic contortions by accusing me of dodging the main issue (despite the fact that quibbling over minor figures is clearly your territory, not mine); if so, let me assure you in advance that I don't give a damn what you have to say. You are an embarrassment and nothing more. Goodnight. The irony in this post is...extraordinary. Thank You. You're welcome. Your reptilian attempts to wriggle out of your lies were at least entertaining, so for that I thank you, too.
Log in to comment