@JayQproductions thats because the PS3 development tools where not easy to use like Microsoft which has had them since windows PC How ever PS3 sold more than Xbox so the funding available to Sony is huge now compared to MS so their development kits are massively better. The japs are clever with technology after all (maybe not nuclear power plant technology how ever)

@Swan_Ronson8475 @sirchick @Slade968 easy for me. COD. lol similiar modern day shooter but BF was just alot more abitious in attempting such a big scale war game. I like developers that aim high - COD is very "play it safe". I do like COD though but it aint ground breaking.

@Slade968 @sirchick @Swan_Ronson8475 it should be in top 10 at least BF2 or 1942.

@Bigjoe1627 Why is my main question ?

@DanteZiza @sirchick so what has that got to do with xbox which is a late addition to the gaming world when Playstation was around alot longer.. surely dedicated gamers would have also followed the PS line not the corporate microsoft late comers. Your arguement has no real relation to why xbox is for real gamers....

@Swan_Ronson8475 no battlefield in that list? Come on that pushed boundries for a FPS.

@shadowboy88 @sirchick @DanteZiza lol true point

@DanteZiza whats a real gamer exactly.. and whats not a real gamer... such a retarded statement. Which makes your entire comment void.

@mike468 this is down to the skill of the developer and the available funding not the hardware. AI is such a minor thing for hardware to handle.

Xbox One is deffinately the most expensive paper weight..bulky looking too =/

Why do all the console concepts look awesome then the real ones look boring.