I'm not sure how the entirety of this all works out but staying independent in this industry and putting out AAA games is a plus.

The trailer gave me just enough to be interested and check it out.

Why does a dragon have a jet pack? I don't get that design choice.

What do devlopers think when making these games? "Let's make a free version of Call of Duty!" Is there any attempt at originality or is this intentionally supposed to feel like CoD with a few graphical nuances? It is a little disappointing to see.

I wonder if they blocked those type of things, though. I wouldn't be surprised if/when people start making those.

There is nothing else that can be said about this except: AWESOME!

I'm actually impressed with TSquared. He did some good commentary there. Good job TSquared.

The game actually looks pretty decent. Reach has left me disappointed so I'm curious to see if 4 can bring back the joy of 3's multiplayer.

"Copy the top players" is actually really good advice because when you're learning a character (or anything for that matter), it's an excellent way to get started to learn lethal combos and matchups. At the end, no. You don't just do the exact thing but you learn what works by copying. Then you add your own style to what works which gets into the whole mindgame thing.

This game looks horrible. It takes way too many shots to kill someone. It clearly looks like Gears and plays like it. The sound effects are terrible. The voice acting is horrid.

About the only thing going for this game are the environments which don't look absolutely terrible.

At first I thought it was going to be noted for its bad b-rated-like character but I guess the game really is that bad. Do people play their own games? How does this happen?