[QUOTE="slarkyslark"]"Slightly lower" Its not even HD... PS3 -1080p. Vita - 540p I pick the 3DS with the amazing lineup it has. Vita has few to only a couple games that pike my interest... read next time. "slightly lower graphics" resolution isnt graphics. But Im sure you already knew that.....Which handheld would you rather have?
3ds= $250
gamecube era graphics, 3d
Vita= $250
slightly lower than Ps3 graphics, OLED screen
For me, easily Vita
I don't buy based on graphics, but I am not a moron. Vita is a MUCH better deal. Why in the hell would I pay the same amount of money for DRASTICALLY worse hardware? Sure as hell not for the gimmicky 3d. It is a huge rip-off for what your getting compared the Vita, and thats a fact. I love Nintendo games, but I am not a sheep who will buy something from them when I know that I am not getting a good deal at all. The awful sales for the thing shows consumers agree as well.
bbkkristian
slarkyslark's forum posts
[QUOTE="slarkyslark"][QUOTE="casharmy"]Gears 3 is the best looking console game ever anyways. /argument uncharted 3 is the best looking console game ever. see i can do that too we both can do it. Reviewers and other sites will agree with me when they are released though ;)spec sheets...in 2011?
lol is this 2005 again? Sad, at least Sony fans were confident enough to admit when certian aspects of there console was better on another system (PS2 vs xbox in graphics)
Losing the graphics argument chip forMS fans must have been too big of a blow to deal with on a realistic level so no we are left with these despeate arguments.
REALISTICALLY, if 360 ismore powerfulthen PS3AND is proven to be easier for developers to create games and get proformance out of AAAAND released a full year before PS3...How in the world did PS3 EVER get games that beat xbox360 games in overall of graphics year after year since 2007?
da_illest101
[QUOTE="slarkyslark"][QUOTE="Heil68"]No really and PC is better than both. chaplainDMKDepends on the pc. 85% of people who play games on pc dont have hardware as good as Xbox 360, so the majority of pcs are worse. And those 15% of PCs remaining account for a huge number of systems more powerful then any console. They are the minority, which is probably why pc sales are so awful nowadays.
Gears 3 is the best looking console game ever anyways. /argumentspec sheets...in 2011?
lol is this 2005 again? Sad, at least Sony fans were confident enough to admit when certian aspects of there console was better on another system (PS2 vs xbox in graphics)
Losing the graphics argument chip forMS fans must have been too big of a blow to deal with on a realistic level so no we are left with these despeate arguments.
REALISTICALLY, if 360 ismore powerfulthen PS3AND is proven to be easier for developers to create games and get proformance out of AAAAND released a full year before PS3...How in the world did PS3 EVER get games that beat xbox360 games in overall of graphics year after year since 2007?
casharmy
Yes,it's impossible to have both good graphics and good gameplay.
Never liked this argument.
+1. Its the only weak argument people without good graphics have to use.
If you read then you would find out they ARE NOT even. 360 is stronger.So with that ps3 > xbox 360 hardware thread yesterday we needed too add one more on the pile?
This is 2011, it should be common knowledge by now that both are even in power.
theuncharted34
Log in to comment