[QUOTE="Silvereign"] [QUOTE="88Ghost89"]

And my personal favorite...

^^The entire scene was art. Anyway, it's easy when you take the worst pictures of a game to prove your point.

88Ghost89

Using the GC screenshots. Technically in this thread you can since its about Zelda's game as a whole but still pathetic on the Wii.  You bash PS3 for downgraded ports we can do the samething to the Wii. 

Those are all Wii shots, I got it from the Wii section. Doesn't matter anyway, the GC and Wii versions are the same graphicaly. I don't know what you said about the PS3 downgraded...I never said anything about the PS3...and downgraded ports? Were talking about art****here...

So yeah, no ones talking about graphics technically, it's art**** and the TC said that TP has a bad art**** and with the pics that I've shown, and from other peoples posts I think we've proven that it has a good art****

i like that shot of the master sword

This is art

 

metroidman7_11

that third picture is awesome. also, lets not forget, TP introduced something new to the zelda franchise: a cinematic flare

SLICKVIC1990  

I get ur point but you really cant call it a remake. Alright the original resident evil series were totally based on puzzle solving, lack of ammo and stuff. But this is totally different. The setttings may be the same but d gameplay is totally different. come to think bout it jill wasnt wit chris in the original didnt u hav to rescue eachother? anyways my point is even with the same characters same location its a different game. And it isnt basically a remake a  basically remade game is mgs twin snakes and a proper remake is resident evil for cube so there man

kasope79

thank you for not being an a-hole like some others on this thread. all i really want to say is that the wii has enough ports and remakes that are sub-par.  RE:UC is really just recycling material, with a few extras. now i loved RE4, and the originals were great too, but we need some original content

i like my pic better.

6icks_tea_4hoar

nice pic. i hope this helps get the point across

[QUOTE="mis3ry"][QUOTE="slickvic1990"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="slickvic1990"]

[QUOTE="NWA_31"]There IS a new Resident Evil, its RE:UC...slickvic1990

please, RE:UC is basically a remake. take the characters, locations, stories from the first three and make the characters move by themselves. New? i dont think so

Your logic is flawed 

Going on what you say most Mario games are remakes, Resident evil 2 was a remake of 1, 3 was a remake of 2 which was a remake of 1. Almost all Zelda games are remakes.

If you're going to argue the point you may need to pick another talking point.

i dont think so. mario games always have new locations.they also went from complete the level games, to adventure games, to even rpg. also, zelda may have the same foundation story, but they are all different. also, ever heard of minish cap, the oracle games, majoras mask, link's awakening?  your research is flawed

how? please.........explain

[QUOTE="slickvic1990"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="slickvic1990"]

[QUOTE="NWA_31"]There IS a new Resident Evil, its RE:UC...mis3ry

please, RE:UC is basically a remake. take the characters, locations, stories from the first three and make the characters move by themselves. New? i dont think so

Your logic is flawed 

Going on what you say most Mario games are remakes, Resident evil 2 was a remake of 1, 3 was a remake of 2 which was a remake of 1. Almost all Zelda games are remakes.

If you're going to argue the point you may need to pick another talking point.

i dont think so. mario games always have new locations.they also went from complete the level games, to adventure games, to even rpg. also, zelda may have the same foundation story, but they are all different. also, ever heard of minish cap, the oracle games, majoras mask, link's awakening?  your research is flawed

[QUOTE="slickvic1990"]

[QUOTE="NWA_31"]There IS a new Resident Evil, its RE:UC...ryustruck

please, RE:UC is basically a remake. take the characters, locations, stories from the first three and make the characters move by themselves. New? i dont think so

umm yeah your logic is pretty flawed. UC aint a remake, so what if its using some of the same locales, characters, its a different and new story. You need to shut your fanboy trap and quit wasting your time complaining about RE5 not being shoddy looking enough for the Wii. Cause thats basically what you and your other fellow RE Fanboys are doing right? just trying to get people to understand that using the same game engine, and elements from the preceding game are just dandy? Thats not what the industry needs, thats not what the Wii needs, and thats not what we need.

Btw my Logic any game that uses the same general engine, with no major alterations, qualifies as a remake.

what is with all the violence on these forums? cant we just debate without being a-holes? first of all, i love RE games. i like the originals, and RE4 is my second favorite game ever. also, i have a wii, and i never mentioned RE5. thats a whole different story. and your logic is terrible. all i was trying to say is that we all want a new RE game and not another remake. and guess what, your logic just called RE:UC a remake. next time, dont be a d**k and and pay attention to what you are reading.