Ah filibustering, we don't really have much of a concept of it, I'm not sure if it happens in Parliament but it certainly isn't at a scale to hold up proceedings. Why is something like that allowed to proceed? Can't a simple law be brought in to limit how much someone is allowed to say, or rather, for how long?

Switch isn't a handheld.

I forgot the Switch used cartridges lol they gotta change it, they really do.

I dunno the in depth aspects of the law, so I don't know if what you say is true. Regardless, very few, a percent of a percent, would not give medical help to someone in need. Unless you're part of the medical set up, you have no idea how much of a life style is it, rather than just an ordinary job.

Anyway, like I said, it comes down to the UN human rights regulations. If you're opposed to this, then you are opposed to international law.

problem with online gaming on PC

I hadnt played PC mp for quite a while till last year, and even though hackers had been an issue years earlier, I was unprepared for how bad things. One example was playing Titanfall 2 and some guy wall ran, jumped onto one of the titans, shot down at it and killed multiple team members. How is that possible? lol

It really has become a cesspit, unless you set up a server with a group of people you know but that is too much hassle and requires a group of gamer friends.

No, because that is the opposite of religious freedom, in fact, it is religious inhibition, by not allowing someone from one particular faith from accessing a building.

Anyway, all of that is straw man, let's stick to the topic at hand shall we? The article raises the issue, that if a doctor or nurse has a moral or religious objection to carrying out a particular procedure, they should be allowed to pass it onto someone who doesn't. Abortion is an example that may be given. That does not mean the patient can not undergo an abortion. So what is the problem here? No one is being inhibited and all rights are being looked after.

Plus, it is being made into a massive deal, when in fact it would only affect a tiny proportion of medical employees. I'm a medical doctor btw, although in the UK we don't have such rights but many doctors, from religious backgrounds or not, would have no problem in carrying out certain procedures, as is the case in the US from personal experience. The small percentage that may not want to, will not be large enough to affect patients wanting abortions and so on.

This is a classic example of atheists creating a storm in a tea cup, under the assumption of providing more rights, while trying to impede the rights of others.

@mattbbpl - this is a reply to you as well

I mean the senatorial system that is in place in the US was a result of the American revolution and is in dire need of a revamp, much like the Parliamentary system in the UK. However, our system does not have a complete government stand still and is almost impossible for that to occur. Has there been much talk about it in the US, I mean changing the current system, not copying a parliamentary system that is?

@mattbbpl: Why is that a problem for you? Religious freedom is a basic human right guaranteed under the universal declaration of human rights.

what kind of system allows a democratically elected government to be shut down, while members of that government still get paid...in a country where the normal people can not access services and so on. Who devised this system and is there need for a revamp?

Gotta be BF2 right? I mean, even forgetting all the micro transactions and loot boxes and all that bollocks which is bad enough but the game itself. Characters move like geriatrics, the turning circle is worse than Resi 5, none of the weapons have any oomph and the space combat...oh the boring, shoddy, slow, linear space combat.