squallff8_fan's forum posts

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts
So the ps3 is failure now after being only out a year? Hmm I think id wait a few more years before writing something like this, because it seems to be doing just fine last time I checked. :)
Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

LMAO yeah pathetic, but im still enjoying my pathetic ps3. Anyways cheap gamer u do know the ps3 is $399 now right? Just thought id let u know since alot of people use to use the $599 price as an excuse. :)

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/videogames/ref=pd_ts_pg_2/105-9839291-8298005?ie=UTF8&pg=2

It's ranked 44th on amazon.com, keep in mind mario glaxy is ranked number 1 and the Wii is #2....even the 80 gb model is ahead of the 40!!!!!!!!!

Johnnypoontang

LMAO wow I thought for a momment u won the lottery from how happy u were, lol. :P

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#4 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

last night I went to my freinds house. I have a PS3 and I got call of duty 4. My freind has both PS3 and Xbox 360 and hegot the 360 version of COD4 because of these sitesthat compare games on PS3 and Xbox 360. So we played the xbox 360 version of COD4 on his 1080p sharp 32'' and the game was BEAUTIFUL. After that I put my COD4 disk into his PS3 system and it was running on 1080p. If the xbox 360 version was BEAUTIFUL the PS3 version was UltraBeautiful and my freind was like DAMNNNN It would be better if I would get the PS3 version.

Hydrolex

Remember gameplay>>>graphics. Besides that, the ps3 version doesnt look that all better, they are almost identical. What I found amazing about the ps3 version of COD4 is the online gameplay with 18 people with no lag. I mean doesnt EA games usually have lag online? I am just suprised how great the graphics look for multiplayer and how there seems to be no issues with lag. Other then that im sure the pc, 360 and ps3 versions are all identical in graphics and is just a must buy game for any of those systems. :)

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

So cows... you decided to go safe and hype uncharted AA... even if it scores AA and doesnt flop what does that really mean?

I'll tell you waht it means... it means that even after its first full year on the market the PS3 is without a single AAA exclusive

Uncharted may not flop, but the PS3 sure did ;)

Johnnypoontang

This thread fails just from u changing accounts to get your point across and trying to stir things up with cows. As for the ps3 being a failure, u can go on and say as much as u like about the ps3 being a failure along with any other fanby who doesnt own one but true fact is, its still selling and on store shelves and is doing almost as good as the xbox 360 did in its first year. Only difference is, the ps3 has rivals to go up against in its first year and it had the same ammount of AAA titles in its first year as the xbox 360 had. May not be exclusive titles but they are AAA titles. Uncharted still is another title that may get AAA and that is this week or next week and that is just the begining because the PS3 in 2008 looks to have a great lineup of games which looking at it from what the xbox 360 lineup looks in 2008 to be better then the 360 lineup. So dont count out the PS3 just yet. It still has alot potential left. Now if the ps3 flops 2008, then maybe u are right, sony will have a hard time digging themselves out of this one.

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

If Ninja Gaiden Sigma counts, then so does Virtua Fighter 5 Online.;)BioShockOwnz

Even with online, for a fighting game, that isnt much. If it were an fps game though then id prolly say that would be very huge for example lets say COD4 came out on the ps3 first but didnt have online play and then the 360 version came along but also added online, then that would be a very big blow because with an fps online it has more to offer then a fighting game online. :)

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

Halo 3 also got more then its fair share of plain stupid reviws.. 7/10.. seriously? I don't care how much you hate Halo, but you should know that the game is not a 7/10.user_nat

Yeah well same thing goes for RAC, I mean 7.5? I mean anything under an 8 is just bs for these type of games right? I guess in the end there reviews are just personal opinions but in reality, the game is really better. :)

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

SUPER MARIO GALAXY has a better ratingthan HALO 3 on Gamerankings, Gamestats and MetaCritic and in everywere!!!!!!!!! Take that halo fanboys !!!!!!

paksiwin

And who said mario still didnt have any fight left in him? I mean im 29 years old and have a kid that is5 and I grew up loving mario and im not really as big fan as I use to be of mario but my kid loves the hell out of mario games and still plays my N64. So I love how nintendo is keeping it real to there roots with these type of games. I guess this christmas I will have to buy my son a wii and this game. :)

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#9 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts
To me, I care about all these company's because if one goes down out of the 3, that leaves 2 company's left which is nintendo and MS, and lets say they both decide to make another console. We already know nintendo is looking at a more casual fanbase where MS will prolly end up doing the same thing and then run nintendo out of the gaming industry and then what do we have left? Nothing, there will be no competition for sales of consoles to drop like we see with the xbox 360 and ps3 is doing now. Devs wont have to try an prove anything with what graphics and gameplay because there wont be any competition for them to do so, and then to make it all bad, MS can just screw u all and put the price tag at any price they want because there isnt nothing we will be able to do about it because it would be the only system out there to buy if u want to play video games. So this is why I say its better to support all three systems, that way we get competitive prices that are affordable and reasonable for us consumers and we get competition from devs from all 3 consoles that brings us what? A better gaming expirience and thats all that matters to real gamers. In the end of the day were all happy and all three company's are happy and competition is great, so we all win in the end. Just my opinion. :)
Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

Hmmm $247 for something that has about a 35% chance of not working. I'll just add a $150 to that and get a ps3 that has less than 1% chance of not working. So my answer is

NO

cupsta

Dude u do know u also get a 3 year warranty, so u will be covered. :)