@ballashotcaller: tell that to the voice actors. i doubt any of them have ever worked 60-80hrs a week. their contributions to a game are a couple weeks at most. while everyone else making the game dedicates years.

@ballashotcaller: remove the voice acting or replace with a different voice actor and the game is still playable and with minimal impact to quality. remove the work of anyone else involved in the game, and it likely doesnt play at all or completely ruins the game. so yes, the voice actors are the least valuable.

"Overwatch-like Paladins" ????? Seriously Gamespot? How about just "Paladins" !!! Feel free to make comparisons, if you feel it's necessary, in the article. But to do such a disservice in the headline is terrible.

@connorman01: equal rights and equal opportunity is what's needed, not quota based hiring that discriminates to achieve it's goals.

@Blk_Mage_Ctype: They don't want true equality. They want the appearance of equality and if they need to discriminate to achieve that, then they will. And apparently that is ok...

@sellingthings: This article has nothing to do with Sony. Take your BS console war somewhere else.

@Supabul: But cutting corners is what MS does best.

@johnholmes1099: This site is absolutely an industry promotional tool. You can't really trust that anything printed here is unbiased, since their advertising revenue stream comes from the same businesses that it "reports" on. But i'll give them the benefit of the doubt that they would tag the article as "paid advertisement" if MS paid directly for it to be written.

Never give in. These people over-value themselves. They are the least important part of a video game and are easily replaced.

@fallingstickman: Sounds like they have plenty of time on their hands to get another job. Voice acting is "contract work", not a career.