Sony is the corp that gets a free pass on SW. They re-release games like TLOUR a year after the original release. They have services like PS Now. They release systems like the Vita and don't support it. They are still praised more than other game companies.

Problem is they don't differentiate them. Journey won GS goty a few years back.

Sometimes I think anybody or any site deemed as "professional" could paste any score to any game and some of you guys would eat it up and want more.

The reason so many gamers have problems with situations like this is because they feel like these experiences aren't part of their field. Kinda like a movie buff rolling his eyes at critical acclaim of some pretentious indie film receiving similar awards to some of film's greats. Or Justin Beiber or the Backstreet Boys getting a Grammy.

These games might (or might not) be good, but do they really deserve to be judged on the same scale as games that are much larger and are more complicated works? Apparently a lot of people do not think so, including myself.

Nah, GS has just lost its way these days, giving crappy games high scores to generate traffic, like giving uprezzed Journey a 10 for instance.

People feel this game is a lazy effort while you say it cuts filler. Pong cuts filler. I think lots of folks are like me and are tired of reviewers praising little indie titles like this to the high heavens, when they only appeal to a very small part of the gaming community.

Trading in systems and games is stupid.

It's worth whatever each individual is willing to pay for it.

Looks more like it is the haters who are irrelevant more than anything else.

What code? I have all three Gears bc games downloaded on my XB1 though.

If NX ends up having the best console hardware on the market then that will be preferable. Nintendo exclusives and the best third party multiplats from both the east and west would be a dream come true.

Fallout 4 or Star Wars Battlefront. Walker Assault on the Forest Moon of Endor is fucking amazing.