I'd like to know if the camera is as unstable (swaying back n forth) as the first game? They call it something like "dramatic experience" but it just ends up to be vomit-inducing.

Any noticeable differences between the console versions? By that I mean major differences in visuals and/or performance?

lol I'm not clicking that link.

The worst thing that review says is basically he isn't a fan of the familiar system in place that was there for FO3 and NV. He criticized the story and pacing, but those aspects have never been particularly engrossing or outstanding in any of the previous games in the first place.

It essentially confirms what I've already suspected FO4 would be: more of the same in a slightly prettier world. I'm perfectly fine with that assessment.

Censorship is wrong in any form of media.

I wouldn't promise such a stupid thing to begin with.

Here's another example where Capcom is censoring content in games.

A Japanese company makes a hack n slash franchise with a couple of RPG elements and suddenly it is a JRPG series? And on top of that it is heralded as being "revolutionary" ? That makes no sense at all.

The fanboyism is strong in this place. Other companies do it too (as I pointed out earlier) but people are acting like only Nintendo is doing it.

Target has a special going online right now: buy two games get one free. Lots of good games are included in the deal like Yoshi's Woolly World and Halo 5. As to be expected though, titles like Fallout 4 and Star Wars Battlefront are not part of the deal.

I spend $214 but managed to save $114 on free games. Great deal.