Risky Business is a 6.6 out of 10 on imdb, that is not a good movie, I will accept toy story 1 and 2, Airplane I will accept, Roger and Me is a documentary so it doesn't count. Well you got 3 out of 5 but did you see how hard that was? You also know how easy it would be for me to bring up 30 movies over 120 minutes that are considered excellent by the majority of people.trickmyster13

Risky Business is a classic.

[QUOTE="swamprat_basic"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]Bad choice imo, I like Mark Wahlberg, but I don't think he really fits the part. I'm kind of dissapointed. =\OremLK

He's a better choice than Brendan Fraser, who was the original choice for the part.

That would have been a disaster to rival Titanic. The movie and the actual shipwreck.

I like Brendan Fraser's movies, but unless they were turning Max Payne into a comedy, it just was not going to work.

Dark Forces II: Jedi Knight

Medal of Honor: Allied Assault

The Curse of Monkey Island

Metal Gear Solid

Super Mario 64

Splinter Cell 2 or 3

Time Splitters 2

[QUOTE="-L-U-I-S-"]I dont get it, I thought lemmings always used GameSpot's score to rub it in cow's faces, but now that cows do have AAA games like Sigma, Rainbow Six, Call of Duty 4 and Oblivion now you wanna use gamerankings? Talk about convenienceswamprat_basic

Not really. Cows are the one's who whined "Lemmingspot." They claimed that Gamespot was biased everytime it flopped a hyped PS3 game. How can Gamespot be biased when it has actually given the PS3 more AAA games than the overall game-rating community.

It was clear that Gamespot had flopped the PS3 up to this point, giving it no definitive AAA exclusives. The closest is a port of an original Xbox game, the majority of which is available on Xbox and Xbox 360. The Cows all cried foul play, and we are just showing that this website, which is supposedly anti-PS3, has actually been kinder to the PS3 than most game-rating sources.

And Gamespot has actually been more harsh on the Xbox 360 than the game-rating community has been on a whole.

As a whole, the game-rating community has given the Xbox 360 eleven AAA games. Gamespot has also given the Xbox 360 eleven AAA games, but one of those is an XBL Arcade game, so Gamespot has really only given the Xbox 360 ten full AAA games.

So which is it, Cows?

All of the evidence points to Gamespot being biased in PS3's favor in regards to the Xbox 360, which means that the PS3's game selection must really suck, if despite that bias, the games are still rating as poorly as the are.

I dont get it, I thought lemmings always used GameSpot's score to rub it in cow's faces, but now that cows do have AAA games like Sigma, Rainbow Six, Call of Duty 4 and Oblivion now you wanna use gamerankings? Talk about convenience-L-U-I-S-

Not really. Cows are the one's who whined "Lemmingspot." They claimed that Gamespot was biased everytime it flopped a hyped PS3 game. How can Gamespot be biased when it has actually given the PS3 more AAA games than the overall game-rating community.

It was clear that Gamespot had flopped the PS3 up to this point, giving it no definitive AAA exclusives. The closest is a port of an original Xbox game, the majority of which is available on Xbox and Xbox 360. The Cows all cried foul play, and we are just showing that this website, which is supposedly anti-PS3, has actually been kinder to the PS3 than most game-rating sources.

Even if we use Metacritic, the Xbox 360 has more games rated 9.0 or higher (11 total games) than PS3 has games rated 8.5 or higher (10 total games). The Xbox 360 has 30 games rated 8.5 or higher.

The PS3 only has 2 games rated 9.0 or higher, and both of them are available on Xbox 360. Of the 8 games rated 8.5 or higher, 5 of them are available on Xbox 360, one of which (VF5) is rated .6 points higher on Xbox 360.

One of the 3 exclusive games is NGS, and the debate is still out on whether that should count as an exclusive. The overwhelming majority of the content in that game was available on the original Xbox, and is playable on Xbox 360.