true_apollo's forum posts

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

You can get almost 8 new games with that much, but if you're absolutely determined to spend all 500 on just 5 games I'd say you're going to have to include both Rock Band and GH3. That will knock out the first $270. You can spend the remaining $230 on Call of Duty 4, Mass Effect, and then whatever else you want. If you wake up soon enough to realize you can get more than 5 games for that amount, I'd say go with: CoD4, RS:V, GRAW2, ME, AC, Forza 2, H3, and RB. That should put you just around $500.

As for the reasons:

Rock Band: This is the most fun you can possibly have with local multiplayer. It's still an awesome game alone, but the most fun can be had with up to three more friends. I cannot express to you how much fun it is playing for hours with some friends trading around parts.

GH3: This is a great game for some of the same reasons as RB, though to a lesser extent with the local multiplayer since you can only have 2 guitars.

CoD4: The best multiplayer shooter out right now if you ask me. The incredible single player campaign is only topped by the extremely deep multiplayer experience. Quite possibly the most intense shooter ever made, and did I mention it looks amazing too?

Halo 3: Ok, not the best game for the 360, but there is definitely a lot of fun to be had here. If you're like me and you have tons of friends who are halo maniacs this is a must have simply for the LAN party possibilities. As much as I dislike the online community, this is still a very solid shooter with good graphics and a great single player campaign.

Assassin's Creed: Amazing stealth action game (though it's hard to categorize this game in any single genre). Incredible graphics paired with great gameplay. The only downsides are that the story is a bit convoluted and there isn't a multiplayer component to keep you coming back after a play through. Out of all the games I recommended above I would say this should be first in line for a rent if you're iffy on the purchase.

Forza 2: As someone who is traditionally turned off by racing games due to the ever-increasing barrier to entry these days, I was pleasantly surprised by Forza's accessibility and, once I got into it, the depth. A great game for racing newbies and veterans alike, and it runs at a buttery-smooth 60 fps all the time.

GRAW 2: If your in to tactical shooters, this is a must have. This game picks up where the excellent GRAW left off and adds some great new elements to the formula. Though the single player campaign leaves a little to be desired, the deep multiplayer experience more than makes up for anything the single player lacks.

Rainbow Six: Vegas: Last but FAR from least, we have Rainbow Six Vegas. I honestly don't know where to begin; this is such an amazing game. Though Rainbow Six is based in tactical shooting, it still maintains quick pace to keep things interesting. The single player campaign is awesome, and beating it on realistic, though very hard, is one of the most satisfying experiences to be had on the 360. Though almost a year old, the multiplayer field is still well populated and for good reason. The multiplayer experience, like several games mentioned above, is very deep here as well. Character customization is great, and the slight RPG elements are only outdone by the great RPG integration in CoD4. The cover system really stands out in my mind when thinking of RS. Though a cover system may seem like a small thing, the way it is integrated into both the single and multi-player experience in Rainbow Six makes it a very fun and interesting ingredient in the RS formula. This cover system is very cool, and it makes cover systems from games like GRAW and GoW look antiquated and awkward. Overall just a great game. The only down side to Rainbow Six at this point is that it is soon to be succeeded by the eagerly anticipated Rainbow Six: Vegas 2.

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

Competition drives prices lower and quality higher.

It sucks to realize what you just bought may be outdated next month, but that happens in a free market society all the time.

I don't understand why people complain about it so much.

KC_Hokie

At least with console SKU revisions you still know that you can play all the games. Anyone who compains about console SKU upgrades/revisions or outdated consoles has never built a PC just to see it become obsolete in 6 months.

I have been a happy owner of a 360 since Summer 2006, and if I could go back I'd buy it and do everything all over again even if I was armed with the knowledge of the elite/better Pro's/etc. The way I see it, you should just be happy with what you have.

Anything Microsoft does to keep the 360 competitive and ahead of the PS3 works for me as long as they continue to support their fan base.

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts
I can't wait. Vegas is the game I've had the most fun with on the 360 so far (though CoD2/4 come close). Also, nice sig David.
Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts
Wow, I flipped out when I saw my rank go from 17, 90% to 1, 70%, but I guess it's happening to everyone, and its bound to get fixed soon enough.
Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

I only went with the E6600 to save the extra 40-50 bucks otherwise I would have chosen the E6850 or Q6600. My anticipation with buying the E6600 is that you will eventually overclock it to mimick a 6850, 3GHz 1333FSB. I'll have to change it, I didn't even look at the E6750 (guess my eyes were drawn strait to the e6850 when looking 1333FSB)

Thanks for the suggestion with the MB. Researching MB's usually makes my head spin a bit since there are so many, so I just went with what I knew rather than searching hard.

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

Seriously dont listen to anyone and have lower expections of you new PC regarding crysis.Infact if your talking 16x10 resolution that youwillNOT get very good performance in crysis in high settings.Please dont listen to anyone who says that he is playing crysis smoothly on high with a GT at 16x10 and blahblahblah.

The only way you could get very good performance in crysis is if you would be using a CRT monitor.

Thinker_145

Not true, I can't vouch for the final version of the game, but I was able to run the demo in Vista at very playable FPS (25+) on "very high" settings (shaders and shadow set down on high) at 1680 x 1050 with no AA.

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts
I recently posted a $1000 build that you could easily improve up to 1200 with a Q6600 or E6850, and an aftermarket cooler
Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

Here is my entry:

CPU , E6600 from newegg $235

GPU, EVGA 512MB 8800GT from newegg $260

MB, MSI P6N 650i SLI Platinum from newegg $120 after $20 MIR

RAM, 2GB G.Skill DDR2 800 from newegg $47

PSU, Thermaltake 430W from newegg $28 after $12 MIR

Monitor, 19" HannsG WS LCD from newegg $160

HD, Seagate 250GB 7200RPM SATA from newegg $70

Case, Cooler Master Centurion from newegg $30 after $15 MIR

Disk Drive, Basic Lite-On DVD burner from newegg $38

TOTAL: $988

As for overclocking, I can personally vouch for that CPU/MB compination up to 3GHz, though that was with a Zalman 9700. With the intel stock cooler I wouldn't overclock above 2.7GHz if at all.

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

As a recent first-time PC builder who has many skeptical friends, I feel the need to "spread the Gospel" if you will about the advantages of building your own computer. I hate hearing about reasonable people throwing away money on prebuilt computers when they could save hundreds and build a much more powerful machine if they would just do it themselves, and so I had an idea.

This thread is intended to be a place where people can post configurations for computers that are well within the budget price range but that don't compromise on power. Obviously being on a gaming site means that these computers should be geared towards the budget (or simply frugal) gamer who wants power but not a high price tag.

This is not a guide on how to build your own computer. This topic is simply meant to give anyone who has ever considered building one a good head start when deciding on what parts to use and how to get the most bang for your buck.

The rules are this:

1) Parts must be new

2) Must include: CPU, GPU, MB, PSU, RAM, Monitor, HD, Case, DVD Drive (we're assuming whoever the rig is for has a spare mouse, keyboard, and some basic speakers)

3) The total for all parts must add up to no more than $1000

4) Shipping costs do not have to be included

5) Mail in rebates are fair game. You can subtract them from the total. (i.e. $70 RAM with $30 MIR = $40 towards total)

6) Must be able to run current games smoothly (Crysis, UT3, SupCom, etc.). Doesn't have to be at max settings, but the idea is that the computer can handle these games well on at the very least medium settings.

7) You're welcome to estimate a reasonable overclock for your submission, but try to build something that will work well without the overclock.

Avatar image for true_apollo
true_apollo

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 true_apollo
Member since 2005 • 350 Posts

If you're willing, I would say that same amount of money could be spent better if you build the whole thing yourself. Then you could go with a E6850 or a Q6600 and better RAM (I never trust stock Dell or HP ram, they usually screw you on quality). And my vote is for the 8800GT over the HD3870 (comparison here). They are in the same price range, but the 8800GT will give you a bit more power.