Sony, and Microsoft need each other to drive quality and make sure that the interest of the consumer comes first.

@mesome713: It doesn't really show anything except comparisons of the Japanese version x European version of the same costumes. That post was simply talking about the differences between the two versions, the post says nothing is different except for some of the costumes.

Microsoft is pulling out of my country completely. I don't see any stores selling Xbox Ones anymore.

Click on the link I gave, it's the source. IGN pulled that sentence out of their ass, the source doesn't say it's Square Enix definitively.

@mesome713: From the source of that article, click here. That's just poor reporting from IGN, the source doesn't say if it's Nintendo or Square definitively.

"Pretty minimal. It's not something I would get upset about, and I don't think it affects the story at all either; but it doesn't look lewd or obscene enough to warrant any censorship, let alone get an M-rating (if that's what Nintendo or Square feared)."

"While this doesn't look like a big deal, it can become a popular trend for modern JRPGs published by Nintendo."

"It's unclear if the NA version will get the same treatment as Europe's, but I hope knowing this can allow some noise to let Nintendo or Square know how we feel, and express it all at Miiverse or Club Nintendo."

We're going somewhere else now, but whatever. What I saw about Xenoblade boiled down to people wanting to see a child dressing like a prostitute, or the pretentious morons who claimed to be against dressing children respectably by "principle." I completely disagree, dressing little girls as prostitutes while fighting huge monsters, or any of the weird fetishes that Japanese products are filled with. Just thinking about it makes me feel uncomfortable.

Games should appeal to all genders, when a game resorts to having this weird shit to appeal to sexually frustrated teenagers then they most likely are crap. A game, or story that is well written and well designed will appeal to all genders, and ages. Look at Mario games, they're rated E. But he appeals to people who are as old as I am. Super Mario 3D World is one of the top 5 games of this generation so far.

This bullshit thinking of "why do I buy games that don't have boobs, when I can buy one that has them?" is just that, bullshit.

I edited the comment since you edited, but I don't think this is something we can look into. If you did look, you're gonna see a lot of Nintendo hate. I did, and the only video with relation was heavy slander on Nintendo. The video narrator was infuriated Nintendo dresses underage girls properly. They talked about how they are against the principle of dressing underage girls, it was utterly ridiculous.

It's really either Square, or Nintendo. I believe it's the latter, you disagree and think it's the former. Neither is gonna come out and say "it's me, guys."

@mesome713: I disagree, and I think Nintendo has strong pull on what makes it into what they publish. Also, Square lets others publish their own games. Tomb Raider being published by MS is an example. Heck, even Bravely Default doesn't have its own website, but a part of Nintendo's.

They can't even maintain a good 30 FPS on their non-VR games. This is basically saying the resolution is going to match the PS2's.

Sigh...