I can't believe that Nintendo keeps allowing CRAP to be put on the Wii. It soils the reputation of the system. Ok, a game like Manhunt 2 (reportedly an excellent game) gets banned by Nintendo, but all the utter rubbish that's been on Wii is excused. I would like to ask, does Nintendo want to destroy itself?

I hope this isn't an indicator of how things will be for the future.

I just hate that Nintendo systems are being treated like crap by 3rd party developers, they bring terrible games for Wii and DS. But for a system like Xbox 360, they go all out to please the audience.

I want to add,

Do most of these game reviewers have 2nd jobs to make due?

I've always wondered how good is the pay for a person working as a reviewer, editor for these gaming sites.

Certainly, reviewing games takes a lot of time. Do they have to play through the entire game before they review it?

What does a game reviewer for Gamespot, IGN, EGM, Nintendo power, etc. earn per year?

Do they get to keep the game too? Do they get the latest systems for free?

Do they get paid while they are playing the game, or is it just pay for each review written?

So many burning questions.

Yes, there's going to be an external HD on the Wii, b/c how else will they fit all those games on there.

Remember that they are going to put out new, original games for download.

Do they really expect people to buy all of SD cards to hold their games?

Does Nintendo have any quality control over the Wii games?

Every single game that's been released on Wii has just gotten pummled to the ground by reviewers. The games are all either mediocre or just plain bad. Nintendo, get your head out your ass, stop putting out bad games. Stop putting out bad VC games all together.

I don't understand how putting a bad game on the Wii VC is possible, because they get to play it beforehand.

It makes me very angry that a company can allow all this mediocrity be released for the system.

Do they read the reviews? Do they play the games before they release them?