without Tom Clancy games shooters would forever be stuck in limbo of burly space marines fighting aliens... they brought sophistication, nuance and maturity to shooters never seen before. and than COD came and robbed modern millitary shooters of their dignity, what a shame...
as for Tom Clancy, his legacy will forever stay with us as it shaped so much more than just literature and entertainment. his books inspired real millitary figures and his crazy theories of the least likely adversaries have always been kinda prophetic.
this near OCD level of detail is what cemented him at least for me, in the pantheon of great writers. i just don't see this anywhere nearly as close in any other writer. and while some call him a bizzare nearly fascist right wing nut job, i fight his technofetish something to admire. people are skeptical and somewhat fearful of a technological revolution in warfare, i think it should be embraced, the Tao of war always move forward whether we want it or not.
they should simply make "Battlefront- Bad Company". with Preston, Haggard, Sweetwater and Redford being in the rebels B company where all the galactic misfits go fight as fodder against the Stormtroopers.
I see a lot of people claiming this to be BF3.5 after playing for a few minutes... first of all, of course it's a lot like it's predecessor, like any good sequel it's an iterative improvement. And the improvements aren't noticable so quickly, yet i already feel like supression has been improved hell lot more and that's a very fundemental change in firefighs mechanics.
I feel like the vehicled actually obey the laws of physics and the soundscape is even better than before. I bet more improvements will be noticed t more i play, and that's great.
wizzzer_thy_133's comments