There are times when i get the idea some devs have so much fun (probably demanded by their publishers too) putting an un-skippable cut-scene (probably not too short too) just at the beginning of a boss-fight, so you have to watch the same fu** retarded a-hole cut-scene for a hundred times, making that boss-fight a totally cringe-worthy and hateful expierience pulling you on the edge of rage-quitting that goddamn piece of shit game over and over again...and if it´s not placed right before some boss-fight, then they put it into the middle of a level right before some passage where you keep dying a hundred of times.

Even just to think about those games who are really doing this, gets my blood pressure raising and i keep asking myself: Why the hell are they doing this?

Devs just can´t be THAT dumb! This must be a way for them to pay us back all those review-bombings, negative user-reviews, death-threats and all that other shit devs have to deal with all the time.

After watching 60 seconds into that video and its cringe-worthy childish cartoon style i just had to stop it.

What in the hell is it with console-people and childish thingies? Is it because of Nintendo being a platform for mostly infantile teens and adults being stuck at an age of 8, i am really not sure about this awkward fact...

I see 17% voted for the first, so i assume you guys are never playing multiplayer-only games, coz their lacking story? LOL

THAT is one major problem i have with games being so much focused on telling their story so that even a somehow "good" story starts to become a pain in the ass too soon.

I am actually having that problem with BIOMUTANT now, i mean besides all those cringe-worthy moments of "doo-doo-doodle-dee-dum!"-kinda childishness of that otherwise lovely title, i am still alyways getting interrupted with more or less uninteresting story bits about the in-game history and other crap i am actually not really interested in, being thrown at me to the point i already started to click it all the hell away so that i can just move on with the damn game.

Guess just like certain games give options in terms of the games difficulty, some probably would be better off with giving options as to how much of its story one wants to experience.

I am actually against "bashing things" in general, but this is the internet and its a common thing to bash the hell out of everything here these days.

@warmblur said:

@ghosts4ever said:

@warmblur said:

@ghosts4ever said:

@warmblur said:

Pirate opinions don't matter.

you cant debate with me. always loose debate.

still I respect you.

Sorry Ghost the GS community has spoken your opinion don't matter.

Thread no longer exist. Check

no evidence of me being pirate? check

Im too nice that I cant name call you like stupid or idiot or something.

Pirate opinions don't matter.

Is that a general fact?

So when the opinions of people, who play games they haven´t bought, doesn´t matter to you and those 56%, then i guess you and those 56% never read any game-reviews from game-magazine journalists, coz they also play and review a game they haven´t bought, hence...their opinon doesn´t matter.

On the other hand, you could as well just ask "Does the opinion of people with black skin really matter?" so that all the racists claim "Of course it does not matters!"

So what does that tell you about "opinions" and what is this telling about yourself and those 56%?

I know call of duty but what is a warzone?

We, the superior pc-master-race, aren´t bound to sub-par low-class console specifications with terrible bad and stuttering 30fps graphics....hehehe-hohoho-hahaha!

Once in a while i have that feeling like playing a game is such a fresh and great experience as it haven´t been in a while, even with a game that i remember wasn´t even that great when i played it the last time.

Guess the market is way too big and there are way too many games to play hence we at times are probably playing games a little too much and too often, especially with pandemic-lockdowns.

When i heard about Jason Statham being in "The Meg" fighting a Shark, i instantly saw him performing his kewl karate-moves on a shark...wtf?

Can´t say i really love Statham, i mean he is playing "The Transporter" everywhere since "The Transporter", in every movie i got that feeling its "The Transporter" again while every movie he does is actually just another "The Transporter" so all of his movies are all the fu**ing same just as like Liam Neeson is making the same movies over and over again while playing the same guy over and over again since "TAKEN" ("96 Hours" the title in some european countries).

So i still haven´t seen "The Meg" coz the idea of Jason Statham fighting a Shark with karate-kicks and fancy mma-moves must rather be an awkwardly stupid experience...even that Statham in fact probably just fights the shark the old-fashioned way with a goddamn harpoon and a fu**ing snorkel.

There are hardly any "new" and "groundbreaking" movies because almost everything has been done already and since "been there, done that" ain´t enough for hollywood, they decided to "go there again, doing it again" hence we get flooded with remakes and reboots all the time.

The only way of doing something "new" and "groundbreaking" is the way of approaching things, like "JOHN WICK" actually just telling the ancient revenge story but giving it a slight twist along with executing it in its own style.

And then again we have "NOBODY" which in fact is the same as "JOHN WICK" but giving it its own twist and making it another great experience.

I infact enjoyed "NOBODY" even more than "JOHN WICK", from a psychological point of view (and coz i just love Bobby!) coz while John Wick does not really want to go back killing people and rather being "forced" to it, "Nobody" is just looking for all the ways so that he can kill people again, after all those years of not killing any bad guys.