[QUOTE="Dopemonk736"][QUOTE="kittykatz5k"]

I don't think you're understanding yourself. You're complaining about a small cliff texture. Here:

There's anotehr cliff down near the bottom, gonna complain about that one as well?

aFrostyBears

man you are the mos stubborn 12 year old I've ever met. i am simply stating that Starcraft would use a more realistic texture for the cliff instead of a cartoony one.

Seriously, Kittykatz your being a Jacka$$ to everyone who doesn't share the same view as you.

well the game was just announced and the textures might still change so i dunno why u guys are arguing over it

lol saw this already but still awesome

"and if u live in europe ****you, you'll have to wait and pay premium"  :lol:

Protoss.

 

I love the fact that Zealots slaughter marines at a ratio of 2/3:1

End game, most people cannot stop 10+ carriers owning their base.

 

Reaver Drop = win.

KoreanX

well that depends if you had a good decent short game and a good micro, zealots would get owned by some marines

i honestly think terran was the best race if you knew how to play them properly

but i loved to play all

[QUOTE="legalize3"]

[QUOTE="kevbo77"]The first 3 months of the systems' launch are not comparable. The PS3, aside from the first month or so, was never supply constrained. I remember that when the 360 came out, I couldn't find one in a retail store for the first 4 months or so. I think that if the 360 had more units available, they probably would have sold considerably more units than they did in those first few months. The PS3, on the other hand, has had a lot of available unites since January. That's the difference as I see it.kamuix

ya riiiight if sony released the ps3 worldwide it would aslo have shortages in the us

He has a point the ps3 only launched in the U.S and Japan. The 360 however attempted a worldwide launch. So there were consoles in other provinces

indeed but the op's article is only comparing NA sales number

and to the guy who keeps saying the ps3 is $200  more and still sold more what do u not understand

if theres no supply they cant sell more, hell they could have been selling 360's for $1 and it still wouldnt of sold more cause there wasnt enough supply 

graw2 is really good, better than the first just wasnt a big enough leap to justify an AAA. but all around is a better game than the first i dunno y ppl dont  see that

halo3 isnt even out yet so i dunno how it could have flopped

and resistance came out last year.

next time dont click on the new topic button 

[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Ganon_919"]

Poor Poor Microsoft, losing all their exclusives to Microsoft like that!

Bad Microsoft! Get your own exclusives!

Vandalvideo

its actually not, i understand u saying ms has no ownership of said title but in halo's case they do.  ffs its a first party dveloper its owned by ms.  And any other game published by ms they have some ownership of it.  

id say halo 3 just cause of the matchmaking system

lately mp games with a lobby system just get on my nerves, sometimes its a hassle to get a game going

imo opinion the reason halo mp is so great is mainly because of the matchmaking, i mean u can so easily join a game, bring parties with u, its just so fast and simple. 

as long as it has more features than motorstorm than yea

the reason motorstorm scored so low is lack of features and gameplay modes 

if you are gonna make fictional scenarios might as well make them interesting not something obvious. obviously with your argument the ps3 would sell the most because the others would be grossly overpriced

i think a better question would be if they all retailed for 600 dollars but had similar graphical and processing power.

lets say ps3 where it stands now - 600

360 with wifi and hddvd - 600

Wii- upgraded graphics and cpu( roughly close to ps3/360) with added hddvd or blu ray -600