@baral-o: So you want a longer single player experience, but you came to game thats multiplayer focused? For $60, you could get 100s of hours of gameplay, but if your not into multiplayer this game really isn't for you. Much like the CODs and Battlefields that came before it.
@Fallenlords69: It would seem you're in the minority on this subject. Campaign was the biggest reason this game got the attention it did. Everyone knew multiplayer was going to be good, but the campaign was a pleasant surprise to most.
@gamingdevil800: Except in the case of MCC, when the game wasn't playable online the game got panned by everyone and sales were effected by the low scores. Granted its not the same, but launching an incomplete game and being allowed time to release more content so it can effect the final is shady at best.
@roycruz: This practice needs to stop. Reviews are designed to help players "on the fence" about buying games as they stand at this moment. Not when new content becomes available or when new patches make the game playable. Scores should reflect the work as it stands and not when the developer has time to get your money first.
@knolddasker: You do realize that by the end of 2018, it will have been 3 years since Black Ops 3? Although, I do hate how some of the games in past felt like they were copying each other.
XCrimsonxSynX's comments