[QUOTE="xid32"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"][QUOTE="MrPinktc"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"] [QUOTE="MrPinktc"]Um what good AI? AI in crysis is retarded. You wanna see some good AI? Play stalker.GodLovesDead
Stalker doesn't have significantly better AI than Crysis (if any better at all).
Yes it does. Enemies take cover, Flank you, sneak up on you, once in awhile they will actually flee. While in crysis they just bum rush you...
I've seen AI in Crysis do all of that. Except for "sneak up on you". And I haven't seen them do that in Stalker either.
[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"][QUOTE="-Master_St3ve-"]Because it's the worst engine ever made. -Master_St3ve-
:roll:
Riiiighhtt....
Really it is. It's not optimized for anything. Warhead is gong to look the same and run smoother. It will run awkward to some video cards. I use to crossfire two ATI cards. It would have flickering shadows and took me forever to even have it detect the Crossfire set-up.
It's your fault for buying Crossfire and ATI's fault for not creating better drivers. A lot of games have problems with Crossfire. And it's optimized just fine. Looks amazing and plays great at 40+ FPS on a $600 PC (at high settings).
You have no idea what your talking about, the 4800 series of cards scale way better than their previous generation, and Crysis DOES have a game engine optimized for ****. Two 8800s will out-perform two 4850s in CRYSIS, but all the other games the 4850s win especially when AA is enabled.
and 40+FPS on a 600 dollar PC?! wtf? only a 8800ULTRA or sli setup can do it, unless your talking about playing at a low resolution with no AA, but then again, your words have become unrealiable you just say "LOL ATI HAS TEH BAD DRIVERS" while I had NEVER had a problem with my two 4850s, or my X850pro in the past.
Crysis is a great looking game, yes, but its optimization for anything not NVIDIA is awful! even with nvidia you dont get the frames youd expect. Stop defending a game with a cheap engine, shallow gameplay and mediocore story.
Chill out dude, you're so angry and assumptuous. Unless you consider 1680x1050 a low resolution, then you'd be correct. Plus, I'm not bashing ATI. I'm running a 4850 myself. I'm just saying that Crossfire is known for the numerous amounts of problems it has and it's ATI's job to make sure crossfire works on all of the games. It's not the developer's problem as they already did the best they could. And it's optimization is great. I get a photorealistic game with mass amounts of physics, open levels, and seemingly infinite view distances at a silky-smooth framerate. Sounds good to me. Don't blame Crytek that you went with a buggy hardware solution.
Do you play at DX9?
and im telling you, crysis is NOT well optimized, we can argue about this all we want, the thing is mate, crysis is VERY nvidia and SLI friendly, 4850 has can scale great in crossfire, it just depends on the game. But to a point, i agree, because crysis was out before any mention of the 4800 series, so i can give it some slack, if you have nvidia cards you wont notice that much.
you have to admit man, crysis had barely any effort to optimize it for ATI cards because they thought the 8800 series would bash ATI into a hole that it would never crawl out of for a while, so they geared alot of their coding towards NVIDIA based cards, rather than ATI, since they use different sets of code to render it, they did have a very small amount of optimization, but it would not be acceptable in today's view.
and 4850 crossfire is not buggy...I did not have problems with it, i play in DX9, 1680X1050, ultra high mod, and get silky smooth frame rates, as you said, but with two 4850s it leaves something to be desired.
Log in to comment