@Candyman_GR: Like some TV shows can be like that, but GoT is certainly not slow. I mean in a mere camera shot adjustment ~3 months passed in the TV show at the end of Season 6 or else one of the major characters can teleport. Find out which one is true in Season 7 (hint they can't teleport!).
This video is AWFUL. 5 ways to make ME:A MP great = "Do the same stuff you did in ME3 MP" WutFace. Like if I had to pick the video that was sponsored by EA, it'd be this one. Disliked! Oh wait there is no down thumb button here!
@RamstainAU: The article says no such thing. It says in Zenimax's opinion that that is what has happened. But it is not the judge or the jury's verdict that that is what has happened that has been reported in the article. There is a HUGE difference between so and so's lawyers / company says "this is what has happened" outside of court and "this is what has been determined as happened" in court by a non-biased party. It's either lazy reporting if it is what has happened or this article is just a bunch of Zenimax's opinions. The article should report what the JURY decided has happened or the judge or whatever, not what Zenimax believes has happened. I don't understand how all you guys replying to me can't tell the difference between what Zenimax's lawyers say and what an actual judgement would read like. I'm quite open to them being one and the same thing, but absolutely nothing in this article reads like a verdict.
@Barighm: No I didn't read the article, which is what I said in my comment because the title of the article is clickbait. So good on you for reading my comment. Would've been nice if gamespot included in the title sub-header that Oculus commented somewhere in here too, rather than just having the Zenimax comment front and center. I also now have read the article and cannot find this "summary ruling", I can see a "Zenimax Attorney's bullet point list of things they believe were determined in the case", which is not same as a "summary ruling". The only place it could be is that Law360 or whatever link which is paywalled/subscriber locked. I'm sure the actual paperwork is much less decisive in favour of Zenimax than the bullet point summary listed here otherwise the damages would be waaaaaaay higher.
The outcome is that Occulus are perfectly legal to continue selling the Rift as their 100% owned and created product. All the money is for Carmack and Luckey breaking NDAs and stuff related to kickstarter add-ins and previous work that isn't in the Rift at all. So it's money for breach of contract stuff, not ownership over the intellectual property of the Rift. Therefore Zenimax cannot block sales of the Rift and this article title is complete click bait or the article is misinformed but I'm not going to read an article written with an incorrect title and with only a comment from Zenimax and not the other party.
@killerious: It's worth it for $50 less on the base console, and if Nintenshits actually confirm a new Metroid game and a new Castlevania game and a Smash Bros game and a new third party, and if Mario doesn't suck, and if it wasn't a subscription for online renting / you kept the month to month games with subscription. TLDR: it's not worth it.
yogibbear's comments