[QUOTE="youjoofoo"]

gears of war on pc blows away killzone2 and gears of war on 360.

http://i43.tinypic.com/2a6pk4p.jpg

Chutebox

gears of war on pc looks better than ut3.

gears of war textures on pc are crazy blow away crysis.

http://i42.tinypic.com/2925l6c.jpg

that's not even best texture more on the way.

gears of war on pc blows away killzone2 and gears of war on 360.

http://i43.tinypic.com/2a6pk4p.jpg

all i gotta say is try this game on pc, the demo if you havent the controls/gameplay feels smooth/great with this, the 360 version i thought button placement was terrible and like killer said it did feel clunky.

this game shouldnt take that high end of pc, just set all graphics options to low, but play it on pc you will feel it's alright control wise on here.

[QUOTE="youjoofoo"]

[QUOTE="killerfist"]Not surprised really. Gameplay felt clunky, visuals are ok, the first had a better atmosphere imo. killerfist

i played the demo on 360 and my pc, the pc version felt good with keyboard and mouse, but the 360 version i agree controls felt screwed with that.

i wouldnt pick this up for any other platform than pc.

i think the atmosphere is better in this one alot more freaky.

the ghost that keeps disappearing/appearing smacking is kinda creepy.

Not surprised really. Gameplay felt clunky, visuals are ok, the first had a better atmosphere imo. killerfist

i played the demo on 360 and my pc, the pc version felt good with keyboard and mouse, but the 360 version i agree controls felt screwed with that.

i wouldnt pick this up for any other platform than pc.

i think the atmosphere is better in this one alot more freaky.

personally i wish monolith would make a blood 3# screw no one liver forever or fear.

fear2 is not bad though, i dont see how anyone could hate demo, wow no leaning? is it that big of a deal?

the maps in first one were so plain jane, fear2 is way better.

the reviewer's opinion is not effecting me i bet he likes crappy games.

[QUOTE="loldfdfgfdgfdg"]

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]From what i've seen in videos and reviews (i have to play the demo yet) the game looks generic, i mean, it looks like they are trying to put the same tricks on this one instead of going for more, sure the mecha's stuff are different, but a little out of context, scary little girl, mechas, i dont see any relation here. Still the game has a 7.0 is not bad, but probably not a full price buy for me, and this is coming from a fan of FEAR. madsnakehhh

The first f.e.a.r had mechs as enemys, in f.e.a.r 2# you can finally pilot them.

This gamespot review is terrible, he didnt even explain what gametypes f.e.a.r2# has or how many maps.

The game isnt that bad i bought f.e.a.r in 2005 when it was first released for pc, i kinda miss leaning, but that's only thing dumbed down, you can time the hand grenades now make them explode when you want,you can sprint now.

overall the level design is much better in this new game also, even if other games you been to same type of themed levels before in past games, but they arent carbon copys of the maps so i dont see problem.

He talked about barriers blocking you from going down certain roads, when crysis lol if you try go to off track the game will kill you say you going off mission...just as bad.

the reviewer was just a idiot and it's not that bad of a game.

But somehow, and thanks to the plot, they feel just right, not forced, and TBH i thought they will dissapear in this one.

Well, he said that the multiplayer is like your average FPS multiplayer, besides he talks about the only new type of game, so what more he could add.

I basically said he didnt mention what gametypes, because he acted like everyone has played fear before, would of been better if he went into detail so new people would know what it supports.

He didnt mention how many multiplayer maps it has though.

i will be getting f.e.a.r 2# because i know it has deathmatch and that's all i care about really.

The weapons are much better in this game, overall this game beats fear1# at everything except no leaning lol.