PC gamers love their little labels. M is just another positive attribute of the game to them. I can't blame them though. They're just sheep regurgitating whatever article they most recently read. It's not like they even possess the intellect to apply logic and reasoning themselves.

"Bad" sounds way too harsh (though to be fair, I have not played it yet). People always seem to exaggerate the quality of a game if it is mediocre or worse.

Also, these developers made Wii Play: Motion? I guess that's why it wasn't as good as the first. Not that the first was anything great, but it did have Tanks!

This looks like the type of game I would play if I was a lonely virgin with no real aspirations in life.

Well prepare to wait a little longer, because it is not coming out until April 25th.

I don't think you know what "objective" means.

There is a good chance we won't see that game until 2015. I feel like if it was coming out this year, we'd already know by now.

People who know nothing about it are.

Looks like this game got McShea'd everyone actually. I'll still get it though. It's at least better than the crap that was BioShock Infinite, according to Tom McShea.

Review scores only don't matter when it concerns PC games that fall below the mark, according to System Wars. This whole thread sucks, especially Charizard1605's post. Wow, what a terrible comment.