A plan to impeach Obama

Most people are sheep. They don't think for themselves and they blindly conform to social norms. This thread is proof enough of that. If we were all living 200 years ago, I would be arguing about the immorality of slavery while the rest of you would be rolling your eyes and calling me crazy.Laihendi

I think plenty of people think for themselves. Just because they don't hold the same beliefs as you doesn't make them sheep.

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

There were many times in history where slavery was acceptable in society, and in groups that weren't regulated by governments. Slavery is general known to have predated recorded history, yet it was only abolished in the US 150 years ago. How do you explain thousands of years of recorded history?

HoolaHoopMan

They locked your mlk thread, lai :(dave123321

[QUOTE="dave123321"]They locked your mlk thread, lai :(Laihendi

Obama is aight.

[QUOTE="dave123321"]They locked your mlk thread, lai :(Laihendi

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] Ace, please explain why the 6,000,000 jews who were murdered during the holocaust did not have rights to violate. I really would like to know.Laihendi

Actually its EXACTLY what that is.. Rights are only defined by backing of a authority.. Good, proper and just have absolutely no fvcking place in this argument because thats not what is being argued.. Especially when "good, proper and just" have varied WILDLY historically.. It seems to me you think your idea of things is in fact the just and correct way to go..

[QUOTE="dave123321"]They locked your mlk thread, lai :(Laihendi

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="dave123321"]They locked your mlk thread, lai :(Aljosa23

Dat persecution complex yo.

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="dave123321"]They locked your mlk thread, lai :(dave123321

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Because they were not granted rights by anyone. Same with the slaves in the US. No one gave them rights so they didn't have them. An abstract concept isn't going to save anyone. You need to actually have backing for an abstract concept to exist. If it doesn't have backing it doesn't exist. We make rights up. It just so happens the Nazis didn't believe Jews had rights. So they did what they pleased with them and it was horrible.sSubZerOo

Actually its EXACTLY what that is.. Rights are only defined by backing of a authority.. Good, proper and just have absolutely no fvcking place in this argument because thats not what is being argued.. Especially when "good, proper and just" have varied WILDLY historically.. It seems to me you think your idea of things is in fact the just and correct way to go..

Lai, who do you want the next president to be?dave123321

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]Yes, and if someone is strong enough to force is bad, unjust, and improper values on others he is not a moral man acting within his rights - he is immoral thug who rules others through brute force.Laihendi

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]Yes, and if someone is strong enough to force is bad, unjust, and improper values on others he is not a moral man acting within his rights - he is immoral thug who rules others through brute force.Ace6301

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

I like Laihendi's little game. No one aside from him agrees and/or comprehends his notions of rights, and consequently he is the only person that has them.

Laihendi

I was only being slightly hyperbolic. I'm sure there are a small handful of people holding your obscure point of view that also have rights.

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Lai, who do you want the next president to be?Laihendi

:lol::lol:

I was living in Minnesota when he was Governor. He should not ever have public office again.

It was written in 1787...do you really think that it shouldn't evolve and be modified?percech

You live in a scary world Laihendeei

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="dave123321"]Lai, who do you want the next president to be?jimkabrhel

:lol::lol:

I was living in Minnesota when he was Governor. He should not ever have public office again.

Another shining example of someone who has gone off the deep end.

I'm not sure if Lai seriously doesn't understand the concept of subjective morality, if he's just purposely being dense, or if he's just trolling.Moriarity_

obama needs to be arrested, tried in a court of law and then executed for treason and espionage.

I'm not sure if Lai seriously doesn't understand the concept of subjective morality, if he's just purposely being dense, or if he's just trolling.Moriarity_

Yo, Layhenny, how come you haven't responded to the PM I sent you on Daves' place, yet?

whipassmt

Goddammit! Was bumping this really necessary?

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="worlock77"] The reasons why you desire power don't matter. The desire itself is greed. Every tyrant, every dicator in history has convinced himself that his motives for seeking power were for the greater good.worlock77

Another person that is not corrupted by power is Faramir, he is tempted but not corrupted and stays consent with his legitimate authority as a captain of Gondor, son of the steward and later on prince of Ithilien.

Hey Worlock, can you guess what my favorite B2K and P.Diddy song is?

So did Laihendi ever say what charges he thinks Obama should be impeached on?PannicAtack

Being a black, liberal-in-name-but-moderate-right-in-practice President, who isn't the almight Elijah Wood, is my guess.

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]So did Laihendi ever say what charges he thinks Obama should be impeached on?jimkabrhel

Being a black, liberal-in-name-but-moderate-right-in-practice President, who isn't the almight Elijah Wood, is my guess.

And what is wrong with Jesse Ventura?Laihendi

And what is wrong with Jesse Ventura?Laihendi

How about the fact that he's absolutely batsh*t?

Is Obama really so bad? I think he's doing a good job so far, especially considering the mess he inherited. It seems to me like most people don't even want to give him a chance.