Afghan Militants Massacre People in UN HQ after Terry Jones Quran Burning.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Just because he didn't physically kill anyone doesn't mean that he is blameless. He did this to inteionally provoke the exact reaction that happen. He holds some guilt in it. Maybe not legally, but morally he does. And I'm so goddamn tired of hateful s***bags hiding behind the 1st amendment. Man up and take some f***ing responsibility you cowards.

surrealnumber5

and if i called you a poop head would it be my fault if you went out and killed some mid 20's accountants?

If you did so know that I would do just that yeah, you have some fault there.

Avatar image for rcafan
rcafan

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 rcafan
Member since 2010 • 2025 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="th3warr1or"] He didn't have to burn it. Everyone knows that those people are like that, there was no point to prove. RAGINGxPONY

Everyone knows people would kill random foreigners if a random guy burns copies of their religious text.

Islam is a violent religion, that is why Terry Jones burned the Quaran, and these people just proved his point by killing 7 innocent people over it. Good job idiots.

you want to believe that is fine but many people don't and that inculdes myself. if your to ingorant to do some reasearch you know they are not any harm.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#203 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="GreatEmpire"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Just because he didn't physically kill anyone doesn't mean that he is blameless. He did this to inteionally provoke the exact reaction that happen. He holds some guilt in it. Maybe not legally, but morally he does. And I'm so goddamn tired of hateful s***bags hiding behind the 1st amendment. Man up and take some f***ing responsibility you cowards.

worlock77

yes, blame the guy who wanted to show the true colors of muslims. lets not blame the crazy muslims who think they have the right to take the life of random ppl.

GTFO hippies

Nowhere did I say those Muslims were blamelees. If I intentionally provoke a nest full of hornets am I blameless when those hornets attack someone?

so men have no higher cognitive functions than a hornet?

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#204 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Just because he didn't physically kill anyone doesn't mean that he is blameless. He did this to inteionally provoke the exact reaction that happen. He holds some guilt in it. Maybe not legally, but morally he does. And I'm so goddamn tired of hateful s***bags hiding behind the 1st amendment. Man up and take some f***ing responsibility you cowards.

worlock77

and if i called you a poop head would it be my fault if you went out and killed some mid 20's accountants?

If you did so know that I would do just that yeah, you have some fault there.

poop head
Avatar image for GreatEmpire
GreatEmpire

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 GreatEmpire
Member since 2011 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] and if i called you a poop head would it be my fault if you went out and killed some mid 20's accountants?surrealnumber5

If you did so know that I would do just that yeah, you have some fault there.

poop head

LMFAO...ok that was funny.

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#206 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

so wait he went through with the burning anyways?:|

wow, and i'm not the least bit surprised it backfired...i thought he wasn't going to do it ?

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

Piss people off? Do you know what Terry Jones reason is or are you simply stating what you think it is? I do not appreciate the man, but he is putting to light what Muslims are capable of doing because of a book.

surrealnumber5

so what were the reasons he burned the Quran?

does not matter, if it is his property he has the right to do as he wishes to it, including burning it.

No there's a difference between freedom and doing whatever you want without being responsible for the consequences, so the reasons DO matter.
Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

[QUOTE="collegeboy64"]

[QUOTE="tenaka2"] You are obviously intentionally ignoring the point. The bill of rights is a piece of paper also, do you think that if someone announced they were going to burn it, and then did so that no one in the US would have any issues? Do you think America as a nation would just say 'meh, its just a piece of paper'?tenaka2

We regularly get a big dose of images of our flag being burned in the middle east. But I am unaware of a single incident of it resulting in a murderous riot in the USA.

I don't think anyone is saying the muslims in Afghanistan shouldn't have issues with pastor butthead. But killing people is certainly not justified, especially innocent people that had nothing to do with the original offense.

There have been Murderous riots in the US, a guys was beaten to death because a bunch of southern folk thought he looked like Osama bin Laden, I imagine there have been more but I'd have to look it up. And again, no one is defending murder, I'm certainly not.

Either do your research and provide the links or you are just pulling it out of your arse.

I never said you were defending murder. You were implying that the general American populace is just as volitile and easily provoked to random murder of innocents as the Afghan muslims have proven themselves to be. You have a big hill to climb to prove that beyond anectdotal evidence.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

yes, blame the guy who wanted to show the true colors of muslims. lets not blame the crazy muslims who think they have the right to take the life of random ppl.

GTFO hippies

GreatEmpire

He was intending for people to die. The intended result was for people to get killed, so that he could then point at how violent Muslims are.

Avatar image for deactivated-5985f1128b98f
deactivated-5985f1128b98f

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 deactivated-5985f1128b98f
Member since 2007 • 1914 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] and if i called you a poop head would it be my fault if you went out and killed some mid 20's accountants?surrealnumber5

If you did so know that I would do just that yeah, you have some fault there.

poop head

mid-20's accountants beware !!!! :lol:

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

Just because he didn't physically kill anyone doesn't mean that he is blameless. He did this to inteionally provoke the exact reaction that happen. He holds some guilt in it. Maybe not legally, but morally he does. And I'm so goddamn tired of hateful s***bags hiding behind the 1st amendment. Man up and take some f***ing responsibility you cowards.

worlock77
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#212 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Harisemo"]

so what were the reasons he burned the Quran?

kuraimen

does not matter, if it is his property he has the right to do as he wishes to it, including burning it.

No there's a difference between freedom and doing whatever you want without being responsible for the consequences, so the reasons DO matter.

he is absolutely responsible for his actions, if the fire went out of control and several people died because of it he would be responsible for those deaths. he getting rid of some of his property and someone thousands of miles away killing people have no more of a connection than i taking out the trash and the earthquake in japan.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#213 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

If you did so know that I would do just that yeah, you have some fault there.

collegeboy64

poop head

mid-20's accountants beware !!!! :lol:

what good is a theory that you are afraid to test.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="GreatEmpire"]yes, blame the guy who wanted to show the true colors of muslims. lets not blame the crazy muslims who think they have the right to take the life of random ppl.

GTFO hippies

surrealnumber5

Nowhere did I say those Muslims were blamelees. If I intentionally provoke a nest full of hornets am I blameless when those hornets attack someone?

so men have no higher cognitive functions than a hornet?

Crazy religious fanatics have very peculiar cognitive functions that are evident to every normal human being. It doesn't take you provoking them to kill innocent people to make that point.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] does not matter, if it is his property he has the right to do as he wishes to it, including burning it.surrealnumber5

No there's a difference between freedom and doing whatever you want without being responsible for the consequences, so the reasons DO matter.

he is absolutely responsible for his actions, if the fire went out of control and several people died because of it he would be responsible for those deaths. he getting rid of some of his property and someone thousands of miles away killing people have no more of a connection than i taking out the trash and the earthquake in japan.

Now you are just being silly, if you knew the trash you're taking out was going to provoke the earthquake then yes you taking the trash out makes you responsible.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#216 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Nowhere did I say those Muslims were blamelees. If I intentionally provoke a nest full of hornets am I blameless when those hornets attack someone?

kuraimen

so men have no higher cognitive functions than a hornet?

Crazy religious fanatics have very peculiar cognitive functions that are evident to every normal human being. It doesn't take you provoking them to kill innocent people to make that point.

if it took the equivalent of lighting a paper match to provoke them to violence than any thing would have worked for them. meaning, they were going to kill people with or without the book being burned
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#217 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] No there's a difference between freedom and doing whatever you want without being responsible for the consequences, so the reasons DO matter.kuraimen

he is absolutely responsible for his actions, if the fire went out of control and several people died because of it he would be responsible for those deaths. he getting rid of some of his property and someone thousands of miles away killing people have no more of a connection than i taking out the trash and the earthquake in japan.

Now you are just being silly, if you knew the trash you're taking out was going to provoke the earthquake then yes you taking the trash out makes you responsible.

damn, according to you i struck the biggest blow to nuclear power in the last 25 years, i am sorry nuclear power, i did not mean to.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] so men have no higher cognitive functions than a hornet?

surrealnumber5

Crazy religious fanatics have very peculiar cognitive functions that are evident to every normal human being. It doesn't take you provoking them to kill innocent people to make that point.

if it took the equivalent of lighting a paper match to provoke them to violence than any thing would have worked for them. meaning, they were going to kill people with or without the book being burned

Eh and if they commit violence without being provoked then yes they are solely responsible but in this case someone knowingly provoked such violence so that person is as much responsible as them for it.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] he is absolutely responsible for his actions, if the fire went out of control and several people died because of it he would be responsible for those deaths. he getting rid of some of his property and someone thousands of miles away killing people have no more of a connection than i taking out the trash and the earthquake in japan.

surrealnumber5

Now you are just being silly, if you knew the trash you're taking out was going to provoke the earthquake then yes you taking the trash out makes you responsible.

damn, according to you i struck the biggest blow to nuclear power in the last 25 years, i am sorry nuclear power, i did not mean to.

So I guess you don't actually care about your argument making any sense to support your point... well good for you I guess :P

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#220 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
I don't see how any one could some how blame Terry Jones for this.. This is freedom of speech people.. What he did holds him in no way accountable to what happened in Afghanistan.. I can't believe people are even insinuating that.. If we are going to make this excuse we might as well say that all the bombings by the US are justified due to the people over there burning American flags.. Absolutely absurd.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#221 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]

Crazy religious fanatics have very peculiar cognitive functions that are evident to every normal human being. It doesn't take you provoking them to kill innocent people to make that point.

kuraimen

if it took the equivalent of lighting a paper match to provoke them to violence than any thing would have worked for them. meaning, they were going to kill people with or without the book being burned

Eh and if they commit violence without being provoked then yes they are solely responsible but in this case someone knowingly provoked such violence so that person is as much responsible as them for it.

nope, people are responsible for their own actions, not the actions of others. those others are responsible for their own actions. the killers chose to kill, they were not forced to kill. there was no outside force applied to their being that made them kill.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

I never said you were defending murder. You were implying that the general American populace is just as volitile and easily provoked to random murder of innocents as the Afghan muslims have proven themselves to be. You have a big hill to climb to prove that beyond anectdotal evidence.

collegeboy64

I don't think that the American populace is just as volatile as muslim extremists. I was just trying to point out that its not simply the burning of paper, the act is symbolic.

I tried to draw a parallel.

So tomorrow a Muslim cleric announces on TV that he will destroy the original declaration of independence and bill of writes documents.

Do you think the all American public would say 'That's ok its just paper' or do you think there would be a backlash?

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#223 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Now you are just being silly, if you knew the trash you're taking out was going to provoke the earthquake then yes you taking the trash out makes you responsible.kuraimen

damn, according to you i struck the biggest blow to nuclear power in the last 25 years, i am sorry nuclear power, i did not mean to.

So I guess you don't actually care about your argument making any sense to support your point... well good for you I guess :P

there is no argument being presented only people who want to shift the blame from killers to nonkillers
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
I don't see how any one could some how blame Terry Jones for this.. This is freedom of speech people.. What he did holds him in no way accountable to what happened in Afghanistan.. I can't believe people are even insinuating that.. If we are going to make this excuse we might as well say that all the bombings by the US are justified due to the people over there burning American flags.. Absolutely absurd.sSubZerOo
Why do you guys keep ignoring that people are not JUSTIFYING the actions of the extremists, they are just saying that the blame is shared. If people burning american flags in the Middle East know they are provoking the US to go on and kill innocent people then yes they are responssible too for those deaths but that wouldn't exonerate the US responsibility either.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#225 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="collegeboy64"]I never said you were defending murder. You were implying that the general American populace is just as volitile and easily provoked to random murder of innocents as the Afghan muslims have proven themselves to be. You have a big hill to climb to prove that beyond anectdotal evidence.

tenaka2

I don't think that the American populace is just as volatile as muslim extremists. I was just trying to point out that its not simply the burning of paper, the act is symbolic.

I tried to draw a parallel.

So tomorrow a Muslim cleric announces on TV that he will destroy the original declaration of independence and bill of writes documents.

Do you think the all American public would say 'That's ok its just paper' or do you think there would be a backlash?

if he purchased the document and owns it he may do what ever he wants to it as it is his property.
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] there is no argument being presented only people who want to shift the blame from killers to nonkillers

Of course there is a valid argument, your just choosing to ignore it. By your twisted logic the planners of 9/11 are innocent as they didn't pilot the planes.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#227 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="collegeboy64"]I never said you were defending murder. You were implying that the general American populace is just as volitile and easily provoked to random murder of innocents as the Afghan muslims have proven themselves to be. You have a big hill to climb to prove that beyond anectdotal evidence.

tenaka2

I don't think that the American populace is just as volatile as muslim extremists. I was just trying to point out that its not simply the burning of paper, the act is symbolic.

I tried to draw a parallel.

So tomorrow a Muslim cleric announces on TV that he will destroy the original declaration of independence and bill of writes documents.

Do you think the all American public would say 'That's ok its just paper' or do you think there would be a backlash?

Yes and how many times have we seen people driven into violence (especially gays) by the West Baptist Cult (Church)? None you say? So what yet again for something like this its covered under the first amendment.. Of course their our consquences such as be criticized by it civily.. You can not in the slightest be blamed for violence.. Inless its direct in trying to incite a riot or other such thing.. This was not it.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if he purchased the document and owns it he may do what ever he wants to it as it is his property.

That wasn't the question, the question was weather or not you think all Americans wouldn't mind a muslim burning the original Declaration of independence.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#229 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I don't see how any one could some how blame Terry Jones for this.. This is freedom of speech people.. What he did holds him in no way accountable to what happened in Afghanistan.. I can't believe people are even insinuating that.. If we are going to make this excuse we might as well say that all the bombings by the US are justified due to the people over there burning American flags.. Absolutely absurd.kuraimen
Why do you guys keep ignoring that people are not JUSTIFYING the actions of the extremists, they are just saying that the blame is shared.

No there isn't, people have the right to be complete asses.. That doesn't some how give the excuse to go into a murderous rampage.. I may think this guy is a jackass and usually am the first people here to defend other religions such as Islam (even though I am a agnostic atheist).. But you can not some how blame this guy for any violence..

If people burning american flags in the Middle East know they are provoking the US to go on and kill innocent people then yes they are responssible too for those deaths but that wouldn't exonerate the US responsibility either.

Except we dont' live ina country where people are KILLED for things they say or protest about... You guys seem not to understand.. You don't hav ehte right to shut people up.. You have the right to be critical of them, but to some how make this a cause to violence inless its direclty inciting a riot or other such things.. No just no..

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#230 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I don't see how any one could some how blame Terry Jones for this.. This is freedom of speech people.. What he did holds him in no way accountable to what happened in Afghanistan.. I can't believe people are even insinuating that.. If we are going to make this excuse we might as well say that all the bombings by the US are justified due to the people over there burning American flags.. Absolutely absurd.kuraimen
Why do you guys keep ignoring that people are not JUSTIFYING the actions of the extremists, they are just saying that the blame is shared. If people burning american flags in the Middle East know they are provoking the US to go on and kill innocent people then yes they are responssible too for those deaths but that wouldn't exonerate the US responsibility either.

so everyone who died in the middle east post 9/11 is the fault of those who did the 9/11 attacks and not any one else?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if it took the equivalent of lighting a paper match to provoke them to violence than any thing would have worked for them. meaning, they were going to kill people with or without the book being burned surrealnumber5

Eh and if they commit violence without being provoked then yes they are solely responsible but in this case someone knowingly provoked such violence so that person is as much responsible as them for it.

nope, people are responsible for their own actions, not the actions of others. those others are responsible for their own actions. the killers chose to kill, they were not forced to kill. there was no outside force applied to their being that made them kill.

And his action were to provoke other people into killing innocents, in fact that was his only intention with those actions so yes he should be responsible for his actions. I don't know what world you live in where your actions happen in a vaccum that doesn't affect anyone or anything, your actions can very well cause other people to do things wrong, otherwise you might want to exonerate Hitler for the millions of deaths since he didn't directly killed everyone, he just provoked others to do it.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#232 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if he purchased the document and owns it he may do what ever he wants to it as it is his property.tenaka2
That wasn't the question, the question was weather or not you think all Americans wouldn't mind a muslim burning the original Declaration of independence.

....Was that the original Koran? No so what is the difference buddy? As far as I am concerned the guy is free to burn as many copies of Declaration of Independence and American Flags as he wishes.. I won't become violent about it nor will I care what so ever.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Yes and how many times have we seen people driven into violence (especially gays) by the West Baptist Cult (Church)? None you say? So what yet again for something like this its covered under the first amendment.. Of course their our consquences such as be criticized by it civily.. You can not in the slightest be blamed for violence.. Inless its direct in trying to incite a riot or other such thing.. This was not it.

sSubZerOo

Why did you quote me only to ignore the questions?Do you think any Americans would be angry if a Muslim burned the declaration of independence?

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#234 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="tenaka2"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if he purchased the document and owns it he may do what ever he wants to it as it is his property.

That wasn't the question, the question was weather or not you think all Americans wouldn't mind a muslim burning the original Declaration of independence.

no i dont think they would call for murder, they can be upset and dislike it but just like the burning of american flags does not make us call for murder neither would that.
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if he purchased the document and owns it he may do what ever he wants to it as it is his property.sSubZerOo

That wasn't the question, the question was weather or not you think all Americans wouldn't mind a muslim burning the original Declaration of independence.

....Was that the original Koran? No so what is the difference buddy? As far as I am concerned the guy is free to burn as many copies of Declaration of Independence and American Flags as he wishes.. I won't become violent about it nor will I care what so ever.

Yes again avoiding the question, why are you scared to answer? The question was weather or not you think all Americans wouldn't mind a muslim burning the original Declaration of independence. Original, not a copy.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#236 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Yes and how many times have we seen people driven into violence (especially gays) by the West Baptist Cult (Church)? None you say? So what yet again for something like this its covered under the first amendment.. Of course their our consquences such as be criticized by it civily.. You can not in the slightest be blamed for violence.. Inless its direct in trying to incite a riot or other such thing.. This was not it.

tenaka2

Why did you quote me only to ignore the questions?Do you think any Americans would be angry if a Muslim burned the declaration of independence?

Americans would be mad if anyone burned it.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#237 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Eh and if they commit violence without being provoked then yes they are solely responsible but in this case someone knowingly provoked such violence so that person is as much responsible as them for it.kuraimen

nope, people are responsible for their own actions, not the actions of others. those others are responsible for their own actions. the killers chose to kill, they were not forced to kill. there was no outside force applied to their being that made them kill.

And his action were to provoke other people into killing innocents,

Assumptions.. You can not prove that his protest was to promote violence..

in fact that was his only intention with those actions so yes he should be responsible for his actions.

........ No they are not.. He did not promote direct violence with this action.. So yet again your wrong.

I don't know what world you live in where your actions happen in a vaccum that doesn't affect anyone or anything,

Your freedom of speech is free to be criticized.. But to have violence brought against it.. Sorry that is not justified and is no way close to it.. If you guys think otherwise than I happily point you to the ruling by the Supreme Court on West Baptist Church in being allowed to protest no matter how offensive their message is.

your actions can very well cause other people to do things wrong,

Actions yes.. Speech that is not directly advocating violence... No sorry.. If we are goign to go downt hat route we can say that every single criticism out there no matter how small will piss off some one some where to go into a violent rage.. So in extention we are all guilty.

otherwise you might want to exonerate Hitler for the millions of deaths since he didn't directly killed everyone,

You have no idea what your talking about.. Hitler ordered those deaths.. He didn't make some convoluted protest that caused a reaction of other people to do it.. So no wrong.

he just provoked others to do it.

We should ban all comedies then that poke fun at anything,b ecause they clearly are there to provoke people.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#238 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Eh and if they commit violence without being provoked then yes they are solely responsible but in this case someone knowingly provoked such violence so that person is as much responsible as them for it.kuraimen

nope, people are responsible for their own actions, not the actions of others. those others are responsible for their own actions. the killers chose to kill, they were not forced to kill. there was no outside force applied to their being that made them kill.

And his action were to provoke other people into killing innocents, in fact that was his only intention with those actions so yes he should be responsible for his actions. I don't know what world you live in where your actions happen in a vaccum that doesn't affect anyone or anything, your actions can very well cause other people to do things wrong, otherwise you might want to exonerate Hitler for the millions of deaths since he didn't directly killed everyone, he just provoked others to do it.

i dont know what world you live in where by men do not control their person, men are not machines men are free and independent thinkers.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I don't see how any one could some how blame Terry Jones for this.. This is freedom of speech people.. What he did holds him in no way accountable to what happened in Afghanistan.. I can't believe people are even insinuating that.. If we are going to make this excuse we might as well say that all the bombings by the US are justified due to the people over there burning American flags.. Absolutely absurd.sSubZerOo

Why do you guys keep ignoring that people are not JUSTIFYING the actions of the extremists, they are just saying that the blame is shared.

No there isn't, people have the right to be complete asses.. That doesn't some how give the excuse to go into a murderous rampage.. I may think this guy is a jackass and usually am the first people here to defend other religions such as Islam (even though I am a agnostic atheist).. But you can not some how blame this guy for any violence..

If people burning american flags in the Middle East know they are provoking the US to go on and kill innocent people then yes they are responssible too for those deaths but that wouldn't exonerate the US responsibility either.

Except we dont' live ina country where people are KILLED for things they say or protest about... You guys seem not to understand.. You don't hav ehte right to shut people up.. You have the right to be critical of them, but to some how make this a cause to violence inless its direclty inciting a riot or other such things.. No just no..

Sometimes excercising your right to remain silent is the good and responssible thing to do. Just because you can do whatever you want doesn't mean you should do it specially when it involves dealing with people from cultures enirely different from yours. It is all part of being intelligent, having common sense and being responsible.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#240 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Yes and how many times have we seen people driven into violence (especially gays) by the West Baptist Cult (Church)? None you say? So what yet again for something like this its covered under the first amendment.. Of course their our consquences such as be criticized by it civily.. You can not in the slightest be blamed for violence.. Inless its direct in trying to incite a riot or other such thing.. This was not it.

DroidPhysX

Why did you quote me only to ignore the questions?Do you think any Americans would be angry if a Muslim burned the declaration of independence?

Americans would be mad if anyone burned it.

The original yes seeing as its priceless piece of history.. A copy like the copy of the Koran? No.. Some would be mad, many wouldn't care.. And littel to no one would go into violent rage and kill some people if they do, they would be charged murder.. And the protest of the person who burned said thing would not be charged.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#241 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="tenaka2"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if he purchased the document and owns it he may do what ever he wants to it as it is his property.

That wasn't the question, the question was weather or not you think all Americans wouldn't mind a muslim burning the original Declaration of independence.

no i dont think they would call for murder, they can be upset and dislike it but just like the burning of american flags does not make us call for murder neither would that.

So you think America would be a little upset? You don't think that any of the 350+ million Americans would be more then a little upset?
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
How the f*** the UN HQ is not guarded properly?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I don't see how any one could some how blame Terry Jones for this.. This is freedom of speech people.. What he did holds him in no way accountable to what happened in Afghanistan.. I can't believe people are even insinuating that.. If we are going to make this excuse we might as well say that all the bombings by the US are justified due to the people over there burning American flags.. Absolutely absurd.surrealnumber5
Why do you guys keep ignoring that people are not JUSTIFYING the actions of the extremists, they are just saying that the blame is shared. If people burning american flags in the Middle East know they are provoking the US to go on and kill innocent people then yes they are responssible too for those deaths but that wouldn't exonerate the US responsibility either.

so everyone who died in the middle east post 9/11 is the fault of those who did the 9/11 attacks and not any one else?

I really don't understand how you think. Do you think blaming someone for something automatically makes that people the only one responsible? You do understand that many different people can share a blame for something don't you?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#244 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Yes and how many times have we seen people driven into violence (especially gays) by the West Baptist Cult (Church)? None you say? So what yet again for something like this its covered under the first amendment.. Of course their our consquences such as be criticized by it civily.. You can not in the slightest be blamed for violence.. Inless its direct in trying to incite a riot or other such thing.. This was not it.

DroidPhysX

Why did you quote me only to ignore the questions?Do you think any Americans would be angry if a Muslim burned the declaration of independence?

Americans would be mad if anyone burned it.

would we go out and start murdering random people lo0caly because someone 10's of thousands of mike away burned it?
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#245 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Why do you guys keep ignoring that people are not JUSTIFYING the actions of the extremists, they are just saying that the blame is shared.

No there isn't, people have the right to be complete asses.. That doesn't some how give the excuse to go into a murderous rampage.. I may think this guy is a jackass and usually am the first people here to defend other religions such as Islam (even though I am a agnostic atheist).. But you can not some how blame this guy for any violence..

If people burning american flags in the Middle East know they are provoking the US to go on and kill innocent people then yes they are responssible too for those deaths but that wouldn't exonerate the US responsibility either.

Except we dont' live ina country where people are KILLED for things they say or protest about... You guys seem not to understand.. You don't hav ehte right to shut people up.. You have the right to be critical of them, but to some how make this a cause to violence inless its direclty inciting a riot or other such things.. No just no..

kuraimen

Sometimes excercising your right to remain silent is the good and responssible thing to do.

I could care less what the good and responsible thing to do in your mind is.. The guy has the right to be bad and irresponsible under the first amendment.. Its your right to be critical of it, to embrace it or to ignore it..

Just because you can do whatever you want doesn't mean you should do it specially when it involves dealing with people from cultures enirely different from yours.

yet again you use SHOULD or other ambigious things about your OWN moral percptions when we are talking about FREEDOM of speech.. A person has the right to say what they want here or do what they want with thier property DEAL with it..

It is all part of being intelligent, having common sense and being responsible.

.......Which makes you a hypocrit.. You think this guys action is completely irreponsible and bad, but your condoning the actions of the people who actually committed a crime because they were "provoked".. He just because some guy called me a bad name over the internet doesn't some how give me the right or make him responsible for me hunting him down and killing him.. Sorry..

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
How the f*** the UN HQ is not guarded properly?GazaAli
Is a good question.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#247 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Why do you guys keep ignoring that people are not JUSTIFYING the actions of the extremists, they are just saying that the blame is shared. If people burning american flags in the Middle East know they are provoking the US to go on and kill innocent people then yes they are responssible too for those deaths but that wouldn't exonerate the US responsibility either.

so everyone who died in the middle east post 9/11 is the fault of those who did the 9/11 attacks and not any one else?

I really don't understand how you think. Do you think blaming someone for something automatically makes that people the only one responsible? You do understand that many different people can share a blame for something don't you?

if they take part in the action in question sure, if this guy planned the attack he would have blame, he had nothing to do with the actions so he gets no blame
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#248 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] nope, people are responsible for their own actions, not the actions of others. those others are responsible for their own actions. the killers chose to kill, they were not forced to kill. there was no outside force applied to their being that made them kill.

surrealnumber5

And his action were to provoke other people into killing innocents, in fact that was his only intention with those actions so yes he should be responsible for his actions. I don't know what world you live in where your actions happen in a vaccum that doesn't affect anyone or anything, your actions can very well cause other people to do things wrong, otherwise you might want to exonerate Hitler for the millions of deaths since he didn't directly killed everyone, he just provoked others to do it.

i dont know what world you live in where by men do not control their person, men are not machines men are free and independent thinkers.

Men live in a society and that makes that the actions of others affect how they act in case you didn't know.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="tenaka2"] That wasn't the question, the question was weather or not you think all Americans wouldn't mind a muslim burning the original Declaration of independence.tenaka2
no i dont think they would call for murder, they can be upset and dislike it but just like the burning of american flags does not make us call for murder neither would that.

So you think America would be a little upset? You don't think that any of the 350+ million Americans would be more then a little upset?

I actually don't think they would care much if you wiped your arse on it.

Americans are cool like that. 8)