Alright Skeptics.. Debunk NASA Astronauts.

  • 173 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

The UFO phenomenon has drawn ire and skepticism from many.. I dare say most. However, there are many cases that have been unexplained, or can seemingly only be explained by the idea that either aliens from another planet or interdimensional beings are responsible. These objects often exhibit flight characteristics that can only be explained by intelligent control, but far above the capabilities of man-made craft. Indeed.. if humans had the type of technology that has been demonstrated by UFOs for at minimum 65 years, we would surely be using such technology in commercial or open military ventures. Some of the most credible witnesses to such events are military personnel, commercial pilots, FAA officials, policemen, and all sorts of former skeptics. However, there is one type of witness that might rank above all of these in terms of credibility. Astronauts. Check out what some of the most credible human beings on Earth (when it comes to flying objects) have experienced, and what they had to say about it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlkV1ybBnHI&feature=feedrec - Buzz Aldrin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvPR8T1o3Dc&feature=related - Gordon Cooper

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkBhME9RCjc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5upFvipUAXs&feature=related- Edgar Mitchell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlOZtfy0MwY&feature=related

Hope you enjoyed that.

StrifeDelivery

Perhaps we should ask the real question: Why does it matter? Would it make you feel better if everyone believed aliens exist? Is it like a fundraiser drive where if you have 90% or more of the population believe in aliens existing that they aliens will show themselves to everyone in major cities? Even if we say we believe in aliens, what good does it do us?

Nothing.

We don't have direct contact, we don't have their technology, we don't even interact with them. Even if we believe it is a mega government conspiracy, do you think we will, as the general public, uncover that? Nope.

So what you're saying is that knowing the truth doesn't matter to you? Because to me, gaining and appreciating knowledge is the point of life.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events. hartsickdiscipl
1). Yes it appears you could stand to care less as you've been posting numerous topics on the subject 2). You don't seem to care about the truth so much as aliens having done it.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts
We don't have direct contact, we don't have their technology, we don't even interact with them. Even if we believe it is a mega government conspiracy, do you think we will, as the general public, uncover that? Nope.StrifeDelivery
If the sightings were real....no government could cover it up.
Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

The UFO phenomenon has drawn ire and skepticism from many.. I dare say most. However, there are many cases that have been unexplained, or can seemingly only be explained by the idea that either aliens from another planet or interdimensional beings are responsible. These objects often exhibit flight characteristics that can only be explained by intelligent control, but far above the capabilities of man-made craft. Indeed.. if humans had the type of technology that has been demonstrated by UFOs for at minimum 65 years, we would surely be using such technology in commercial or open military ventures. Some of the most credible witnesses to such events are military personnel, commercial pilots, FAA officials, policemen, and all sorts of former skeptics. However, there is one type of witness that might rank above all of these in terms of credibility. Astronauts. Check out what some of the most credible human beings on Earth (when it comes to flying objects) have experienced, and what they had to say about it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlkV1ybBnHI&feature=feedrec - Buzz Aldrin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvPR8T1o3Dc&feature=related - Gordon Cooper

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkBhME9RCjc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5upFvipUAXs&feature=related- Edgar Mitchell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlOZtfy0MwY&feature=related

Hope you enjoyed that.

StrifeDelivery

Perhaps we should ask the real question: Why does it matter? Would it make you feel better if everyone believed aliens exist? Is it like a fundraiser drive where if you have 90% or more of the population believe in aliens existing that they aliens will show themselves to everyone in major cities? Even if we say we believe in aliens, what good does it do us?

Nothing.

We don't have direct contact, we don't have their technology, we don't even interact with them. Even if we believe it is a mega government conspiracy, do you think we will, as the general public, uncover that? Nope.

Having conclusive proof of (intelligent) alien life would completely change our role and understanding of the universe. It would pretty much pick up all the major religions of the world by the feet and swing it around like whatever that sport is.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#55 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events. Ace6301
1). Yes it appears you could stand to care less as you've been posting numerous topics on the subject 2). You don't seem to care about the truth so much as aliens having done it.

When I see a pile of evidence on one side, and nothing really against it.. I'm going to lean towards the evidence, even if it's not 100% conclusive in the opinions of many.. much less OT.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

That's not what I said. I just told you what I heard when I watched that video.

hartsickdiscipl

But your entire point is they are aliens.. And what other plausible explainations did you offer beside those? Dragon's, time travelers, and angels.. No one is going to take you seriously in this thread let alone this board.

When you take all of the sightings, encounters, etc.. into account, the picture points much more towards aliens from other worlds than dragons, time travelers, etc.. That should be clear enough. If it's not, I think you're intentionally being difficult.

If people don't take these things seriously, that's their loss. I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events.

:| :lol: LOL so wait wait. You actually think these other sightings could possibly be angels, dragons and time travelers now.. And you have the right to insult our supposed stand on this thing.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#57 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

But your entire point is they are aliens.. And what other plausible explainations did you offer beside those? Dragon's, time travelers, and angels.. No one is going to take you seriously in this thread let alone this board.

sSubZerOo

When you take all of the sightings, encounters, etc.. into account, the picture points much more towards aliens from other worlds than dragons, time travelers, etc.. That should be clear enough. If it's not, I think you're intentionally being difficult.

If people don't take these things seriously, that's their loss. I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events.

:| :lol: LOL so wait wait. You actually think these other sightings could possibly be angels, dragons and time travelers now.. And you have the right to insult our supposed stand on this thing.

I think that they could all be describing the same thing from different points of view and technological levels of understanding. It's entirely possible.

Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts
Hartsick, weren't you making fun of someone for positing conspiracy theories yesterday? :?
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#59 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Did you actually hear him say that? His sentences at the end of that interview were extremely unclear as to what he was trying to express. He was stuttering and never put a complete sentence together to say what you claim he did.

hartsickdiscipl

At 4:27, his exact words are "What did I see during the flight? We saw one of the 4 panels to 99.999."

I wasn't convinced by his delivery in this interview. Especially when he had indicated otherwise before. You really think that he would figure out that it was one of the panels 40 years later? That makes no sense.

Not to mention that other Astronauts, pilots, etc. etc. have said much more conclusively that they have encountered incredibly advanced craft under intelligent control.

So when Buzz Aldrin says something that fits your preconception, you cite him as an authority, and when he says something that contradicts your preconception, you reject his statement? 'kay
Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

But your entire point is they are aliens.. And what other plausible explainations did you offer beside those? Dragon's, time travelers, and angels.. No one is going to take you seriously in this thread let alone this board.

sSubZerOo

When you take all of the sightings, encounters, etc.. into account, the picture points much more towards aliens from other worlds than dragons, time travelers, etc.. That should be clear enough. If it's not, I think you're intentionally being difficult.

If people don't take these things seriously, that's their loss. I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events.

:| :lol: LOL so wait wait. You actually think these other sightings could possibly be angels, dragons and time travelers now.. And you have the right to insult our supposed stand on this thing.

He never said that.

What he's saying is that when so many people claim they've seen "aliens" (not angels, not dragons, not time travellers) then he's going to conclude that there are aliens (and not angels, dragons, or time travellers).

Example: if 50 people say they saw apples, he's not going to be open to the possibility of them actually seeing oranges, or bananas, or some other fruit. They're convinced they saw apples, so he's convinced they saw apples.

I mean aliens.

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]

I don't even think that you're aware that others are luling at you.

hartsickdiscipl

The problem with 95% of mankind is that they give a crap when people laugh at them. The other 5% are concerned with things that really matter.

Like side panels of Apollo 11 being aliens?

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events. hartsickdiscipl

1). Yes it appears you could stand to care less as you've been posting numerous topics on the subject 2). You don't seem to care about the truth so much as aliens having done it.

When I see a pile of evidence on one side, and nothing really against it.. I'm going to lean towards the evidence, even if it's not 100% conclusive in the opinions of many.. much less OT.

No what you have is some people saying they saw something they assumed to be a UFO. That's not piles of evidence. In fact that's hardly evidence at all, it certainly wouldn't fly in a court of law let alone the scientific community. You're basically jumping at shadows and calling them aliens.
Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

So when Buzz Aldrin says something that fits your preconception, you cite him as an authority, and when he says something that contradicts your preconception, you reject his statement? 'kaychessmaster1989
I didn't watch the video so I can't comment, but he did say that Aldrin was stuttering and seemed unsure of his response. Saying definitively "I saw aliens" vs a stuttering and unsure No... no i'm pretty sure it was something else" is two entirely different arguments. It's not about making the words fit the argument and discarding all others, just which ones seemed to be more believed by the witness. That's my understanding anyway, as I said I didn't watch the video.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

When you take all of the sightings, encounters, etc.. into account, the picture points much more towards aliens from other worlds than dragons, time travelers, etc.. That should be clear enough. If it's not, I think you're intentionally being difficult.

If people don't take these things seriously, that's their loss. I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events.

DigitalExile

:| :lol: LOL so wait wait. You actually think these other sightings could possibly be angels, dragons and time travelers now.. And you have the right to insult our supposed stand on this thing.

He never said that.

What he's saying is that when so many people claim they've seen "aliens" (not angels, not dragons, not time travellers) then he's going to conclude that there are aliens (and not angels, dragons, or time travellers).

Example: if 50 people say they saw apples, he's not going to be open to the possibility of them actually seeing oranges, or bananas, or some other fruit. They're convinced they saw apples, so he's convinced they saw apples.

I mean aliens.

But the logical thing to believe is......those people saw something they couldn't explain...not that they immediately saw aliens.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]So when Buzz Aldrin says something that fits your preconception, you cite him as an authority, and when he says something that contradicts your preconception, you reject his statement? 'kayDigitalExile

I didn't watch the video so I can't comment, but he did say that Aldrin was stuttering and seemed unsure of his response. Saying definitively "I saw aliens" vs a stuttering and unsure No... no i'm pretty sure it was something else" is two entirely different arguments. It's not about making the words fit the argument and discarding all others, just which ones seemed to be more believed by the witness. That's my understanding anyway, as I said I didn't watch the video.

He was clear about it....I watched.
Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Did you actually hear him say that? His sentences at the end of that interview were extremely unclear as to what he was trying to express. He was stuttering and never put a complete sentence together to say what you claim he did.

hartsickdiscipl

At 4:27, his exact words are "What did I see during the flight? We saw one of the 4 panels to 99.999."

I wasn't convinced by his delivery in this interview. Especially when he had indicated otherwise before. You really think that he would figure out that it was one of the panels 40 years later? That makes no sense.

Not to mention that other Astronauts, pilots, etc. etc. have said much more conclusively that they have encountered incredibly advanced craft under intelligent control.

He didn't "indicate otherwise before". The video you linked to was clearly guilty of quote mining. Since it was from a narrated television special on UFOs, it's perfectly understandable to edit out the parts of Buzz's story that lead to the boring non-alien conclusion. He didn't suddenly figure things out 40 years later and reverse his story.

Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]

I don't even think that you're aware that others are luling at you.

CaveJohnson1

The problem with 95% of mankind is that they give a crap when people laugh at them. The other 5% are concerned with things that really matter.

Like side panels of Apollo 11 being aliens?

Side panels were constructed entirely of aliens until the Ban on Alien Cruelty in 1984.
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

The UFO phenomenon has drawn ire and skepticism from many.. I dare say most. However, there are many cases that have been unexplained, or can seemingly only be explained by the idea that either aliens from another planet or interdimensional beings are responsible. These objects often exhibit flight characteristics that can only be explained by intelligent control, but far above the capabilities of man-made craft. Indeed.. if humans had the type of technology that has been demonstrated by UFOs for at minimum 65 years, we would surely be using such technology in commercial or open military ventures. Some of the most credible witnesses to such events are military personnel, commercial pilots, FAA officials, policemen, and all sorts of former skeptics. However, there is one type of witness that might rank above all of these in terms of credibility. Astronauts. Check out what some of the most credible human beings on Earth (when it comes to flying objects) have experienced, and what they had to say about it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlkV1ybBnHI&feature=feedrec - Buzz Aldrin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvPR8T1o3Dc&feature=related - Gordon Cooper

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkBhME9RCjc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5upFvipUAXs&feature=related- Edgar Mitchell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlOZtfy0MwY&feature=related

Hope you enjoyed that.

hartsickdiscipl

Perhaps we should ask the real question: Why does it matter? Would it make you feel better if everyone believed aliens exist? Is it like a fundraiser drive where if you have 90% or more of the population believe in aliens existing that they aliens will show themselves to everyone in major cities? Even if we say we believe in aliens, what good does it do us?

Nothing.

We don't have direct contact, we don't have their technology, we don't even interact with them. Even if we believe it is a mega government conspiracy, do you think we will, as the general public, uncover that? Nope.

So what you're saying is that knowing the truth doesn't matter to you? Because to me, gaining and appreciating knowledge is the point of life.

It really can't be called the truth when the evidence is shaky at best.

I'm not going to deny that extraterrestrials probably exist, but assuming something is true and then looking at the evidence to back up your original belief is backwards

Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts

Given the size of the universe I wouldn't doubt there being some sort of alien life.

I just think people read to much into what they see in the sky and its easy to draw a million conclusions when you dunno what your looking at.

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]I could care less what OT thinks of me. It doesn't matter. What does matter is the truth about what's behind the UFOs and ancient writings about similar events. hartsickdiscipl

1). Yes it appears you could stand to care less as you've been posting numerous topics on the subject 2). You don't seem to care about the truth so much as aliens having done it.

When I see a pile of evidence on one side, and nothing really against it.. I'm going to lean towards the evidence, even if it's not 100% conclusive in the opinions of many.. much less OT.

Derp u need to take a logic class, u can't disprove a negative fyi.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#71 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

Didn't I just leave this dance?

Just because an astronaut says it's so does not make it so, that's the fallacy of appealing to authority. Substantial prrof would help their position.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

Given the size of the universe I wouldn't doubt there being some sort of alien life.

I just think people read to much into what they see in the sky and its easy to draw a million conclusions when you dunno what your looking at.

Kcube
They see what they want to see I think. Lights appearing to go fast.....hey dude we're seeing aliens. They look no farther than that.
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

U do relize that if anything you're pushing people away from the idea of aliens visiting us because your arguments are so poorly constructed right?

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#74 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] 1). Yes it appears you could stand to care less as you've been posting numerous topics on the subject 2). You don't seem to care about the truth so much as aliens having done it.Ace6301

When I see a pile of evidence on one side, and nothing really against it.. I'm going to lean towards the evidence, even if it's not 100% conclusive in the opinions of many.. much less OT.

No what you have is some people saying they saw something they assumed to be a UFO. That's not piles of evidence. In fact that's hardly evidence at all, it certainly wouldn't fly in a court of law let alone the scientific community. You're basically jumping at shadows and calling them aliens.

That, and the amount of evidence presented does not make or break a position, that's a fallacy of some sort, I think appeal to numbers or something like that. You have to consider quality of evidence first, and then all other things being equal quantity can be considered.

Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts

[QUOTE="Kcube"]

Given the size of the universe I wouldn't doubt there being some sort of alien life.

I just think people read to much into what they see in the sky and its easy to draw a million conclusions when you dunno what your looking at.

LJS9502_basic

They see what they want to see I think. Lights appearing to go fast.....hey dude we're seeing aliens. They look no farther than that.

I saw a pie wedged glowing orange streak across the sky in 98/99.My first thought was "new space shuttle".then a few years ago they "start" testing that new plane publicly that fits what I saw exactly right down to the orange glow.

Even nameless (may he rip) featured my article on his website and after that he had a flood of people saying they saw it the same night I did...What They didn't know is I changed the date :P.SO my one story that was true(minus the date to test them) but it turned into "an object glowing orange hovering" to a ton of other things.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#76 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

I don't if any of you have ever watched the "UFO Disclosure Project," but check it out. This is just a short clip from it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1rY&feature=related

Avatar image for blackacidevil96
blackacidevil96

3855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 blackacidevil96
Member since 2006 • 3855 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]Everyone knows UFOs exist. The question is their origin.hartsickdiscipl

And if you'd watched the videos, you'd know that some Astronauts have come to the conclusion that they must be alien craft. I mean really.. if you're a pilot with top secret clearance, flying the latest and greatest tech, and you see a whole different type of craft doing things that are beyond the capabilities of anything that you've seen.. what are you going to think? When you're an astronaut and you experience the same type of thing, what are you going to think? There are endless testimonials from radar operators, pilots, etc.. detailling these craft performing maneuvers and moving at speeds that we can't comprehend. All I posted today are a few videos of Astronauts detailing their personal encounters, and (some) giving their conclusions based on these experiences. They're not just saying that there are unidentified flying objects. They're saying that they're under intelligent control in some cases, and that they're not man-made.

and there were other people on the planet at the same time trying to keep their craft secret....like i dont know....the russians.

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts
it's apparent that aliens have been visiting earth for some time now.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

I don't if any of you have ever watched the "UFO Disclosure Project," but check it out. This is just a short clip from it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1rY&feature=related

hartsickdiscipl
 Oh yeah all those structures and stuff. Yeah. Totally.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#80 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Another very interesting video from The Disclosure Project.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvySTIkMEqI&feature=related

Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts

Anyone remember project blue book?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

I don't if any of you have ever watched the "UFO Disclosure Project," but check it out. This is just a short clip from it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1rY&feature=related

hartsickdiscipl
2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#83 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I don't if any of you have ever watched the "UFO Disclosure Project," but check it out. This is just a short clip from it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1rY&feature=related

LJS9502_basic

2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I don't if any of you have ever watched the "UFO Disclosure Project," but check it out. This is just a short clip from it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1rY&feature=related

hartsickdiscipl

2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

Nope. He'd be up on charges. Is he up on charges?
Avatar image for blackacidevil96
blackacidevil96

3855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 blackacidevil96
Member since 2006 • 3855 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] 2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.LJS9502_basic

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

Nope. He'd be up on charges. Is he up on charges?

agreed.

I've worked at Langley, I know many (though certainly not all) things that go on there and yes there are lots of very secret things going on. and a lot of the stuff was old cold war stuff that hasnt be divulged to the public.

but this guy just heard a comment from some other guy in the room. "oh we found a base on the dark side of the moon". man.....how credible

Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] 2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.LJS9502_basic

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

Nope. He'd be up on charges. Is he up on charges?

Exactly

Nobody would get away with disclosing classified information.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

Another very interesting video from The Disclosure Project.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvySTIkMEqI&feature=related

hartsickdiscipl
Oh man I can't wait for this FTL travel system to...wait it's been like 9 years? Oh...well...
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#88 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] 2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.LJS9502_basic

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

Nope. He'd be up on charges. Is he up on charges?

Picture this- The US government pursues charges against a man who discloses information about bases on the backside of the moon.

Seriously? You really think that they would go after this guy? That would reaffirm to the public that what he was telling was the truth. The entire power structure of the world would crumble if that got out. It's a lot easier for them to just let him talk, since most people won't listen to him anyways.

Now this is the part where you say something about how it's more likely that he just made the story up. Given the number of corroborating witnesses to his story and others like it, I have to disagree.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I don't if any of you have ever watched the "UFO Disclosure Project," but check it out. This is just a short clip from it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1rY&feature=related

hartsickdiscipl

2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

He'd be up for charges. Also check out that dark side of the moon picture I posted. You see aliens? I don't. if they're afraid of his truth getting out then why not just silence him? It's obvious they can do it, I mean they've hidden aliens for over 60 years. Oh wait the US can't even keep a lid on their imminent military plans and couldn't tell when terrorists were going to attack.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

hartsickdiscipl

Nope. He'd be up on charges. Is he up on charges?

Picture this- The US government pursues charges against a man who discloses information about bases on the backside of the moon.

Seriously? You really think that they would go after this guy? That would reaffirm to the public that what he was telling was the truth. The entire power structure of the world would crumble if that got out. It's a lot easier for them to just let him talk, since most people won't listen to him anyways.

Now this is the part where you say something about how it's more likely that he just made the story up. Given the number of corroborating witnesses to his story and others like it, I have to disagree.

Yes. They would.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#91 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] 2011-1965 =46. Had he been given Access to Top Secret information he would not be allowed to disclose said information for 99 years after the fact. The fact that's he gone public means there was no access to top secret information about a base on the moon.Ace6301

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

He'd be up for charges. Also check out that dark side of the moon picture I posted. You see aliens? I don't.

I guess you didn't watch the video and listen to what was being said about the photos.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#92 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Nope. He'd be up on charges. Is he up on charges?LJS9502_basic

Picture this- The US government pursues charges against a man who discloses information about bases on the backside of the moon.

Seriously? You really think that they would go after this guy? That would reaffirm to the public that what he was telling was the truth. The entire power structure of the world would crumble if that got out. It's a lot easier for them to just let him talk, since most people won't listen to him anyways.

Now this is the part where you say something about how it's more likely that he just made the story up. Given the number of corroborating witnesses to his story and others like it, I have to disagree.

Yes. They would.

No, they wouldn't. They wouldn't because it would unleash a public reaction that they couldn't control.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

hartsickdiscipl

He'd be up for charges. Also check out that dark side of the moon picture I posted. You see aliens? I don't.

I guess you didn't watch the video and listen to what was being said about the photos.

I did. And it wasn't very credible TBH....
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Picture this- The US government pursues charges against a man who discloses information about bases on the backside of the moon.

Seriously? You really think that they would go after this guy? That would reaffirm to the public that what he was telling was the truth. The entire power structure of the world would crumble if that got out. It's a lot easier for them to just let him talk, since most people won't listen to him anyways.

Now this is the part where you say something about how it's more likely that he just made the story up. Given the number of corroborating witnesses to his story and others like it, I have to disagree.

hartsickdiscipl

Yes. They would.

No, they wouldn't. They wouldn't because it would unleash a public reaction that they couldn't control.

He wouldn't be tried in public dude.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#95 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yes. They would.LJS9502_basic

No, they wouldn't. They wouldn't because it would unleash a public reaction that they couldn't control.

He wouldn't be tried in public dude.

You really dont think that what was happening to him would get out to somebody in the public?

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

No, it means that he decided that it was more important to let people know about it than to play by their rules.

hartsickdiscipl

He'd be up for charges. Also check out that dark side of the moon picture I posted. You see aliens? I don't.

I guess you didn't watch the video and listen to what was being said about the photos.

I did. He said it was on the back side of the moon. I posted a picture of the back side of the moon. You know those pictures do exist. We've orbited the moon. There isn't any secret bases there. Guess who was lying. It was that guy.
Avatar image for StrifeDelivery
StrifeDelivery

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 StrifeDelivery
Member since 2006 • 1901 Posts

[QUOTE="StrifeDelivery"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

The UFO phenomenon has drawn ire and skepticism from many.. I dare say most. However, there are many cases that have been unexplained, or can seemingly only be explained by the idea that either aliens from another planet or interdimensional beings are responsible. These objects often exhibit flight characteristics that can only be explained by intelligent control, but far above the capabilities of man-made craft. Indeed.. if humans had the type of technology that has been demonstrated by UFOs for at minimum 65 years, we would surely be using such technology in commercial or open military ventures. Some of the most credible witnesses to such events are military personnel, commercial pilots, FAA officials, policemen, and all sorts of former skeptics. However, there is one type of witness that might rank above all of these in terms of credibility. Astronauts. Check out what some of the most credible human beings on Earth (when it comes to flying objects) have experienced, and what they had to say about it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlkV1ybBnHI&feature=feedrec - Buzz Aldrin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvPR8T1o3Dc&feature=related - Gordon Cooper

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkBhME9RCjc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5upFvipUAXs&feature=related- Edgar Mitchell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlOZtfy0MwY&feature=related

Hope you enjoyed that.

DigitalExile

Perhaps we should ask the real question: Why does it matter? Would it make you feel better if everyone believed aliens exist? Is it like a fundraiser drive where if you have 90% or more of the population believe in aliens existing that they aliens will show themselves to everyone in major cities? Even if we say we believe in aliens, what good does it do us?

Nothing.

We don't have direct contact, we don't have their technology, we don't even interact with them. Even if we believe it is a mega government conspiracy, do you think we will, as the general public, uncover that? Nope.

Having conclusive proof of (intelligent) alien life would completely change our role and understanding of the universe. It would pretty much pick up all the major religions of the world by the feet and swing it around like whatever that sport is.

Well there is a difference between conclusive proof and the general I-believe-in-aliens bit. You're right, having such conclusive proof would be a historical event. But where we are now is simply we don't have anything, just people like TC saying to say they are real. I'm all for conclusive proof and everything, just that, right now, without said evidence, it doesn't matter if everyone in the world believes aliens exist, there would be no proof of it.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

No, they wouldn't. They wouldn't because it would unleash a public reaction that they couldn't control.

hartsickdiscipl

He wouldn't be tried in public dude.

You really dont think that what was happening to him would get out to somebody in the public?

Oh you mean like FTL engines, alien species and bases on the back side of the moon? Oh wait. Your logic isn't even syncing with your own logic now.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

No, they wouldn't. They wouldn't because it would unleash a public reaction that they couldn't control.

hartsickdiscipl

He wouldn't be tried in public dude.

You really dont think that what was happening to him would get out to somebody in the public?

That he was convicted? So what? The government does not allow their secrets to be broadcast. If they don't prosecute and convict...it would be a bad precedent. He's bound by the same rules as everyone else in the intelligence field.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

lol, alien lore.... it's like religion for people that watched a documentary once.

is the universe crawling with alien life? yeah prolly so.

has any of it been here? yes... if you ask some guy selling his book about aliens on earth.