Anyone care to explain why Marijuana is STILL illegal?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-59913425220eb
deactivated-59913425220eb

1772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 deactivated-59913425220eb
Member since 2002 • 1772 Posts
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

I know kids who've smoked it since grade school. Soem of them are the smartest kids I know. Some are the dumbest. It depends on the person and where their priorities are. If their priority is marijuana then they are more likely to be dumb because thats all their life is about. The smartest person I know (Its not me and that pisses me off) smokes it nearly every day and she's into everything in school thats not about brawn or popularity. The argument that it makes people dumb has as much disproof as proof.

Franklinstein

So then cigarettes don't cause cancer.

I used a similar line of reasoning to yours to draw that conclusion.

Except, cigarettes have been proven to cause cancer, marijuana has not been proven to cause brain damage or loss of brain development, or lung cancer, or anything.

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight and the earth is magically getting hotter
Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#102 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts
[QUOTE="TheMightyHoov"]

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"] People will abuse it, I'm not arguing that, people abuse it now, I'm arguing that if we take the dangerous aspects of buying it out of the equation it will be abused less.StopThePresses

No, making it legal basically opens the door for increased abuse. You really believe that making it legal is better because people wont have to get it from drug dealers?

I do. It's much of the reason that alcohol was re-legalized.

YES, we are slowly turning people sexy-hippo!
Avatar image for sexy-hippo
sexy-hippo

2170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 sexy-hippo
Member since 2005 • 2170 Posts
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

I know kids who've smoked it since grade school. Soem of them are the smartest kids I know. Some are the dumbest. It depends on the person and where their priorities are. If their priority is marijuana then they are more likely to be dumb because thats all their life is about. The smartest person I know (Its not me and that pisses me off) smokes it nearly every day and she's into everything in school thats not about brawn or popularity. The argument that it makes people dumb has as much disproof as proof.

So then cigarettes don't cause cancer.

I used a similar line of reasoning to yours to draw that conclusion.

How do you come to that conclusion? There's physical proof that tobacco causes cancer. There is no evidence that just because you smoke pot you will be dumb. If there is I would like to see it. I'm sure as hell not stupid.
Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#104 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="TheMightyHoov"]

No, making it legal basically opens the door for increased abuse. You really believe that making it legal is better because people wont have to get it from drug dealers?

TheMightyHoov

Yes, I do, and I have a perfect little piece of evidence, just look at the time surrounding prohibition. Think about how much more trouble alcohol caused when it was illegal.

And legalizing made everything fine.... Oh wait

Like I've said several times, abuse will happen. Look at the abuse of alcohol during prohibition and afterwards, believe it or not it was worse during.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="TheMightyHoov"]

No, making it legal basically opens the door for increased abuse. You really believe that making it legal is better because people wont have to get it from drug dealers?

Franklinstein

I do. It's much of the reason that alcohol was re-legalized.

YES, we are slowly turning people sexy-hippo!

My opinion has not changed over the course of this thread. You assume too much.

Avatar image for Montaya
Montaya

4269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Montaya
Member since 2005 • 4269 Posts

Because its smelly!

Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#107 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="StopThePresses"] I do. It's much of the reason that alcohol was re-legalized.StopThePresses

YES, we are slowly turning people sexy-hippo!

My opinion has not changed over the course of this thread. You assume too much.

It was a joke, although, I would like to see it.
Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#108 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

Because its smelly!

Montaya
You're right. I give in. This is definitely why it's illegal... You silly little airplane you.
Avatar image for sexy-hippo
sexy-hippo

2170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 sexy-hippo
Member since 2005 • 2170 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="StopThePresses"] So then cigarettes don't cause cancer.

I used a similar line of reasoning to yours to draw that conclusion.

GameGuy642003

Except, cigarettes have been proven to cause cancer, marijuana has not been proven to cause brain damage or loss of brain development, or lung cancer, or anything.

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight and the earth is magically getting hotter

Even if global warming is a hoax I still support going green. There's been too many wars over foreign fuel sources and wildlife needs a break from trash. Why not make labels with paper made from hemp instead of cutting down trees. Sounds like a good idea to me.

Avatar image for Franklinstein
Franklinstein

7017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#110 Franklinstein
Member since 2004 • 7017 Posts

[QUOTE="GameGuy642003"][QUOTE="Franklinstein"] Except, cigarettes have been proven to cause cancer, marijuana has not been proven to cause brain damage or loss of brain development, or lung cancer, or anything.sexy-hippo

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight and the earth is magically getting hotter

Even if global warming is a hoax I still support going green. There's been too many wars over foreign fuel sources and wildlife needs a break from trash. Why not make labels with paper made from hemp instead of cutting down trees. Sounds like a good idea to me.

Me too. It's a shame that we can't do these things.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"][QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

I know kids who've smoked it since grade school. Soem of them are the smartest kids I know. Some are the dumbest. It depends on the person and where their priorities are. If their priority is marijuana then they are more likely to be dumb because thats all their life is about. The smartest person I know (Its not me and that pisses me off) smokes it nearly every day and she's into everything in school thats not about brawn or popularity. The argument that it makes people dumb has as much disproof as proof.

So then cigarettes don't cause cancer.

I used a similar line of reasoning to yours to draw that conclusion.

How do you come to that conclusion? There's physical proof that tobacco causes cancer. There is no evidence that just because you smoke pot you will be dumb. If there is I would like to see it. I'm sure as hell not stupid.

The validity of a line of reasoning does not solely rest upon whether it arrives at a conclusion which is correct. The sun is a star and therefore cats are mammals. That argument has just about as much validity.
Avatar image for deactivated-59913425220eb
deactivated-59913425220eb

1772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 deactivated-59913425220eb
Member since 2002 • 1772 Posts

[QUOTE="GameGuy642003"][QUOTE="Franklinstein"] Except, cigarettes have been proven to cause cancer, marijuana has not been proven to cause brain damage or loss of brain development, or lung cancer, or anything.sexy-hippo

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight and the earth is magically getting hotter

Even if global warming is a hoax I still support going green. There's been too many wars over foreign fuel sources and wildlife needs a break from trash. Why not make labels with paper made from hemp instead of cutting down trees. Sounds like a good idea to me.

im sorry I was quoting Charlie from Its ALways sunny in philedelphia. I dont support going green, well its always good to think about the health of our environment but getting all hippie and crap is weak and really doesnt solve lifes problems.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"] YES, we are slowly turning people sexy-hippo!Franklinstein

My opinion has not changed over the course of this thread. You assume too much.

It was a joke, although, I would like to see it.

I didn't say it shouldn't be legalized. That doesn't mean I'm just going to accept any old silly argument for it being legal as a valid one or disregard any argument against as being invalid.
Avatar image for TheMightyHoov
TheMightyHoov

2459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 TheMightyHoov
Member since 2009 • 2459 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMightyHoov"]

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"] Yes, I do, and I have a perfect little piece of evidence, just look at the time surrounding prohibition. Think about how much more trouble alcohol caused when it was illegal.Franklinstein

And legalizing made everything fine.... Oh wait

Like I've said several times, abuse will happen. Look at the abuse of alcohol during prohibition and afterwards, believe it or not it was worse during.

I see nothing good coming from it. Giving people something that impairs the mind and makes them feel good is jut asking for something bad to happen

Avatar image for sexy-hippo
sexy-hippo

2170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 sexy-hippo
Member since 2005 • 2170 Posts
[QUOTE="Franklinstein"][QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight and the earth is magically getting hotterGameGuy642003

Even if global warming is a hoax I still support going green. There's been too many wars over foreign fuel sources and wildlife needs a break from trash. Why not make labels with paper made from hemp instead of cutting down trees. Sounds like a good idea to me.

Me too. It's a shame that we can't do these things.

Atleast allow us to do that. Trees take a long time to grow. Marijuana can grow pretty much anywhere. You can grow it in you back yard, your basement, a closet, my ass if you really wanted to bad enough. Its only logical. Pot growers can make some money selling the hemp.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#116 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
Cultural inertia. When you look objectively at it, there's little reason to criminalize it due to lethality when compared to tobacco, or due to impairment when compared with alcohol. Yes, there are stated health benefits, and legalization would allow taxation and control rested from illegal organizations. Sure, you can bring up the resistance of the hemp lobby, or the timber lobby in the past, or the puritan lobby's which want to protect the children, but they're fringes. The idea is too taboo in most places. People, regardless of evidence, don't like the idea, the stigma for the majority of voters is too strong. That may change in the next few decades, but right now it won't.
Avatar image for sexy-hippo
sexy-hippo

2170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 sexy-hippo
Member since 2005 • 2170 Posts

[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"][QUOTE="StopThePresses"] So then cigarettes don't cause cancer.

I used a similar line of reasoning to yours to draw that conclusion.

StopThePresses

How do you come to that conclusion? There's physical proof that tobacco causes cancer. There is no evidence that just because you smoke pot you will be dumb. If there is I would like to see it. I'm sure as hell not stupid.

The validity of a line of reasoning does not solely rest upon whether it arrives at a conclusion which is correct. The sun is a star and therefore cats are mammals. That argument has just about as much validity.

With people whose priority is school and people whose priority is smoking weed determining degree of education? I still don't see where you're coming from.

Avatar image for optiplex7
optiplex7

738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 optiplex7
Member since 2006 • 738 Posts

I busted some pot smoker driving once, they got in big trouble same punishment for alcohol and driving.

Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="sexy-hippo"] How do you come to that conclusion? There's physical proof that tobacco causes cancer. There is no evidence that just because you smoke pot you will be dumb. If there is I would like to see it. I'm sure as hell not stupid.sexy-hippo

The validity of a line of reasoning does not solely rest upon whether it arrives at a conclusion which is correct. The sun is a star and therefore cats are mammals. That argument has just about as much validity.

With people whose priority is school and people whose priority is smoking weed determining degree of education? I still don't see where you're coming from.

Well, exactly what I said in the first place. If that argument is valid, then I can use a similar argument to say that cigarettes don't cause cancer. If cigarettes really didn't cause cancer, would that make that particular argument for the conclusion any more valid? No, it would not. It would make the conclusion true, but it would not make the argument that you used to get to it a logical one.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

I busted some pot smoker driving once, they got in big trouble same punishment for alcohol and driving.

optiplex7
Glad someone is helping to keep those idiots off the road. If was up to me, anyone who did that **** would have their license revoked for five years, first offense (unless it was an emergency situation).
Avatar image for TheMightyHoov
TheMightyHoov

2459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 TheMightyHoov
Member since 2009 • 2459 Posts

[QUOTE="optiplex7"]

I busted some pot smoker driving once, they got in big trouble same punishment for alcohol and driving.

StopThePresses

Glad someone is helping to keep those idiots off the road. If was up to me, anyone who did that **** would have their license revoked for five years, first offense (unless it was an emergency situation).

I guy in my town has been found drunk several times while behind the wheel. They didnt revoke his license until after he killed someone while driving intoxicated. Before that happened he had 4 DWI's :?

Avatar image for csimonma
csimonma

2820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#122 csimonma
Member since 2005 • 2820 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"] The validity of a line of reasoning does not solely rest upon whether it arrives at a conclusion which is correct. The sun is a star and therefore cats are mammals. That argument has just about as much validity. StopThePresses

With people whose priority is school and people whose priority is smoking weed determining degree of education? I still don't see where you're coming from.

Well, exactly what I said in the first place. If that argument is valid, then I can use a similar argument to say that cigarettes don't cause cancer. If cigarettes really didn't cause cancer, would that make that particular argument for the conclusion any more valid? No, it would not. It would make the conclusion true, but it would not make the argument that you used to get to it a logical one.

But cigarettes do cause cancers which has been proven and marijuana doesnt which has also been proven, so??
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

With people whose priority is school and people whose priority is smoking weed determining degree of education? I still don't see where you're coming from.

csimonma

Well, exactly what I said in the first place. If that argument is valid, then I can use a similar argument to say that cigarettes don't cause cancer. If cigarettes really didn't cause cancer, would that make that particular argument for the conclusion any more valid? No, it would not. It would make the conclusion true, but it would not make the argument that you used to get to it a logical one.

But cigarettes do cause cancers which has been proven and marijuana doesnt which has also been proven, so??

To begin with, we weren't even talking about marijuana causing cancer, so...yeah, whatever.

Avatar image for H_U_R_D
H_U_R_D

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#125 H_U_R_D
Member since 2006 • 4006 Posts

go to a doctor, say u have hardcore back pain, get yourself a medical marijuana card

go to a place that has a license to sell, and you're fine

marijuana actually is not bad at all compared to Alcohol and Cigarettes, as TC has said

also has benefits that have been proven, like reducing stress, relieving pain, etc.

certain strains also improve focus, and relieve fatigue as well

Avatar image for n00bkid
n00bkid

4163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 n00bkid
Member since 2006 • 4163 Posts
Government just wants to waste our time and money, that is all.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

With people whose priority is school and people whose priority is smoking weed determining degree of education? I still don't see where you're coming from.

sexy-hippo

Well, exactly what I said in the first place. If that argument is valid, then I can use a similar argument to say that cigarettes don't cause cancer. If cigarettes really didn't cause cancer, would that make that particular argument for the conclusion any more valid? No, it would not. It would make the conclusion true, but it would not make the argument that you used to get to it a logical one.



Would you not agree that someone who cares only about getting high is less likely to pay attention in school? Thats my point...



Your argument is essentially thus:

Person A regularly consumes product B.

Person A does not exhibit any obvious symptoms of condition C.

Therefore, consumption of product B never causes condition C in any people over the long run.

--------------

Whether or not it is true that consumption of product B never causes condition C is not relevant to the point of whether it can be concluded from those two premises alone. If I can find a case that contradicts the argument, then obviously the argument is invalid. It doesn't matter whether the conclusion is accidentally correct in another case.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#128 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50173 Posts

No my argument is that it has never been proven to be harmful, UNLIKE alcohol which is legal. Alcohol has proven harmful effects, marijuana doesn't. Funny for a drug that has been illegal for so long...Franklinstein

Harmful is defined as causing or likely to cause harm. The characters or side effects of marijuana use are as follows:

  • Problems with memory and learning
  • Distorted perception
  • Difficulty with thinking and problem solving
  • Loss of coordination
  • Increased heart rate
  • Anxiety, paranoia and panic attacks

Depending on the circumstance and the user involved, I can see marijuana being likely to cause harm.

-

As for Alcohol, if it was up to be I would make the product illegal. But that's a multi-billion dollar industry, you can't expect a multi-billion industry go away over night, it takes time. Even Tobacco companies are still alive and kicking raking in the billions or hundreds of millions.

Avatar image for Heretix_Aevum
Heretix_Aevum

4105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Heretix_Aevum
Member since 2005 • 4105 Posts

Marijuana is illegal because it's dangerous.

Avatar image for H_U_R_D
H_U_R_D

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#130 H_U_R_D
Member since 2006 • 4006 Posts

[QUOTE="Franklinstein"]No my argument is that it has never been proven to be harmful, UNLIKE alcohol which is legal. Alcohol has proven harmful effects, marijuana doesn't. Funny for a drug that has been illegal for so long...Stevo_the_gamer

Harmful is defined as causing or likely to cause harm. The characters or side effects of marijuana use are as follows:

  • Problems with memory and learning
  • Distorted perception
  • Difficulty with thinking and problem solving
  • Loss of coordination
  • Increased heart rate
  • Anxiety, paranoia and panic attacks

Depending on the circumstance and the user involved, I can see marijuana being likely to cause harm.

-

As for Alcohol, if it was up to be I would make the product illegal. But that's a multi-billion dollar industry, you can't expect a multi-billion industry go away over night, it takes time. Even Tobacco companies are still alive and kicking raking in the billions or hundreds of millions.

how widespread is that? does it happen 100% of the time? 50%?

doubt it, most of those symptoms are minor, ive never seen anyone have any issues with MJ, nor have i heard any

just a bunch of BS

pros of MJ outweigh cons, period, end of discussion

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#131 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50173 Posts

how widespread is that? does it happen 100% of the time? 50%?

doubt it, most of those symptoms are minor, ive never seen anyone have any issues with MJ, nor have i heard any

just a bunch of BS

pros of MJ outweigh cons, period, end of discussion

H_U_R_D

I'm glad you've never seen anyone have any issues with marijuana. However, anecdotal evidence doesn't prove anything. Unless you conducted a scientific research study like these Universities, Health organizations, Major Research Centers ect did. I'm going to have to say they hold, by leaps and bounds mind you, more credibility in naming the possible side effects of marijuana use.

Avatar image for sexy-hippo
sexy-hippo

2170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 sexy-hippo
Member since 2005 • 2170 Posts

[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"][QUOTE="StopThePresses"] Well, exactly what I said in the first place. If that argument is valid, then I can use a similar argument to say that cigarettes don't cause cancer. If cigarettes really didn't cause cancer, would that make that particular argument for the conclusion any more valid? No, it would not. It would make the conclusion true, but it would not make the argument that you used to get to it a logical one.StopThePresses



Would you not agree that someone who cares only about getting high is less likely to pay attention in school? Thats my point. I smoke myself. But I pay attention in school. I don't smoke all the time either.



Your prior and current arguments both are essentially thus:

Person A regularly consumes product B.

Person A does not exhibit any obvious symptoms of condition C.

Therefore, product B never causes condition C in any people over the long run.

--------------

Whether or not it is true that product B never causes condition C is not relevant to the point of whether it can be concluded from those two premises alone. If I can find a case that contradicts the argument, then obviously the argument is invalid. It doesn't matter whether the conclusion is accidentally correct.

That is not my argument actually. My argument is that the misconception that marijuana kills brain cells instantly has been proven false, and people who smoke and exhibit those symptoms generally aren't caused by the use itself, rather where the priorities are. Drugs; usually less educated, less smart; or school involvement; generally more inteligent, more educated.

Avatar image for MrLions
MrLions

9833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#133 MrLions
Member since 2007 • 9833 Posts
I don't see the hate on this I mean....seriously the dumb people who smoke it ruin it for all of us :( It's more healthier than cigs by light years.
Avatar image for H_U_R_D
H_U_R_D

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#134 H_U_R_D
Member since 2006 • 4006 Posts

[QUOTE="H_U_R_D"]how widespread is that? does it happen 100% of the time? 50%?

doubt it, most of those symptoms are minor, ive never seen anyone have any issues with MJ, nor have i heard any

just a bunch of BS

pros of MJ outweigh cons, period, end of discussion

Stevo_the_gamer

I'm glad you've never seen anyone have any issues with marijuana. However, anecdotal evidence doesn't prove anything. Unless you conducted a scientific research study like these Universities, Health organizations, Major Research Centers ect did. I'm going to have to say they hold, by leaps and bounds mind you, more credibility in naming the possible side effects of marijuana use.

i'm sure.

the whole ordeal about legalizing the stuff is bull

people will believe whatever the gov't, universities, research centers want them to, and i dont believe it for one second, i have known/seen well over 50 people on MJ, nobody has had any harmful side effects

that is as good as any research to tell you how trivial any cons of MJ there are

believe me or don't, idc, but this argument is bull

i bet there are plenty of people in government who use it, actually, i guarantee it

Avatar image for MrLions
MrLions

9833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#135 MrLions
Member since 2007 • 9833 Posts

As for Alcohol, if it was up to be I would make the product illegal. But that's a multi-billion dollar industry, you can't expect a multi-billion industry go away over night, it takes time. Even Tobacco companies are still alive and kicking raking in the billions or hundreds of millions.

Stevo_the_gamer

Alchhol will always be there we tried once and it didnt work out :(

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#136 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Blind principle.
Avatar image for MrLions
MrLions

9833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#137 MrLions
Member since 2007 • 9833 Posts

[QUOTE="H_U_R_D"]how widespread is that? does it happen 100% of the time? 50%?

doubt it, most of those symptoms are minor, ive never seen anyone have any issues with MJ, nor have i heard any

just a bunch of BS

pros of MJ outweigh cons, period, end of discussion

Stevo_the_gamer

I'm glad you've never seen anyone have any issues with marijuana. However, anecdotal evidence doesn't prove anything. Unless you conducted a scientific research study like these Universities, Health organizations, Major Research Centers ect did. I'm going to have to say they hold, by leaps and bounds mind you, more credibility in naming the possible side effects of marijuana use.

That study was probably done on first time smokers.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#138 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50173 Posts

i'm sure. the whole ordeal about legalizing the stuff is bull people will believe whatever the gov't, universities, research centers want them to, and i dont believe it for one second, i have known/seen well over 50 people on MJ, nobody has had any harmful side effects that is as good as any research to tell you how trivial any cons of MJ there are believe me or don't, idc, but this argument is bull i bet there are plenty of people in government who use it, actually, i guarantee itH_U_R_D

Anecdotal evidence doesn't prove anything, mate. I literally can't stress that enough. And did I happen to see some conspiracy esque thoughts in there as well? :?

Avatar image for H_U_R_D
H_U_R_D

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#139 H_U_R_D
Member since 2006 • 4006 Posts

[QUOTE="H_U_R_D"]i'm sure. the whole ordeal about legalizing the stuff is bull people will believe whatever the gov't, universities, research centers want them to, and i dont believe it for one second, i have known/seen well over 50 people on MJ, nobody has had any harmful side effects that is as good as any research to tell you how trivial any cons of MJ there are believe me or don't, idc, but this argument is bull i bet there are plenty of people in government who use it, actually, i guarantee itStevo_the_gamer

Anecdotal evidence doesn't prove anything, mate. I literally can't stress that enough. And did I happen to see some conspiracy esque thoughts in there as well? :?

dude, conspiracy all the time, 24/7

too many factors on how things are run in society today to just be content with believing everything you hear, i refuse to do it

Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6663 Posts
For me it's not that there's no legitimate reason to ban marijuana, it's the hypocrisy in the reasons they give when tobacco and alcohol is legal.
Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6663 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="optiplex7"]

I busted some pot smoker driving once, they got in big trouble same punishment for alcohol and driving.

TheMightyHoov

Glad someone is helping to keep those idiots off the road. If was up to me, anyone who did that **** would have their license revoked for five years, first offense (unless it was an emergency situation).

I guy in my town has been found drunk several times while behind the wheel. They didnt revoke his license until after he killed someone while driving intoxicated. Before that happened he had 4 DWI's :?

I find this incredibly frustrating. I bet it's because they can't be ****** doing all the paperwork until someone is killed and they have no choice.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

That is not my argument actually. My argument is that the misconception that marijuana kills brain cells instantly has been proven false, and people who smoke and exhibit those symptoms generally aren't caused by the use itself, rather where the priorities are. Drugs; usually less educated, less smart; or school involvement; generally more inteligent, more educated.

sexy-hippo

What follows is the post that started this:

I know kids who've smoked it since grade school. Soem of them are the smartest kids I know. Some are the dumbest. It depends on the person and where their priorities are. If their priority is marijuana then they are more likely to be dumb because thats all their life is about. The smartest person I know (Its not me and that pisses me off) smokes it nearly every day and she's into everything in school thats not about brawn or popularity. The argument that it makes people dumb has as much disproof as proof.

sexy-hippo

Now I will use the same argument with cigarettes:

I know kids who've smoked cigarettes since grade school. Soem of them are the healthiest kids I know. Some are the sickest. It depends on the person and where their priorities are. (No direct analog for this part. It's not really talking about direct effects anyway.) The healthiest person I know (Its not me and that pisses me off) smokes cigarettes nearly every day and she's into everything in school thats not about brawn or popularity. The argument that it makes people sick has as much disproof as proof.

StopThePresses

Where in this argument were you disucssing research or a news article or even so much as a show you saw on television? Nowhere. This is just your personal anecdote about a few young people (and providing all of the links in the world after this post is not going to retroactively change what you said here).

Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]

As for Alcohol, if it was up to be I would make the product illegal. But that's a multi-billion dollar industry, you can't expect a multi-billion industry go away over night, it takes time. Even Tobacco companies are still alive and kicking raking in the billions or hundreds of millions.

MrLions

Alchhol will always be there we tried once and it didnt work out :(

It didn't work out for reasons rather similar to why keeping marijuana illegal isn't working out.
Avatar image for sexy-hippo
sexy-hippo

2170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 sexy-hippo
Member since 2005 • 2170 Posts
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

What follows is the post that started this:

[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"]

I know kids who've smoked it since grade school. Soem of them are the smartest kids I know. Some are the dumbest. It depends on the person and where their priorities are. If their priority is marijuana then they are more likely to be dumb because thats all their life is about. The smartest person I know (Its not me and that pisses me off) smokes it nearly every day and she's into everything in school thats not about brawn or popularity. The argument that it makes people dumb has as much disproof as proof.

Now I will use the same argument with cigarettes:

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]

I know kids who've smoked cigarettes since grade school. Soem of them are the healthiest kids I know. Some are the sickest. It depends on the person and where their priorities are. (No direct analog for this part. It's not really talking about direct effects anyway.) The healthiest person I know (Its not me and that pisses me off) smokes cigarettes nearly every day and she's into everything in school thats not about brawn or popularity. The argument that it makes people sick has as much disproof as proof.

Where in this argument were you disucssing research or a news article or even so much as a show you saw on television? Nowhere. This is just your personal anecdote about a few young people (and providing all of the links in the world after this post is not going to retroactively change what you said here).

That does not compair in any way because there is proof that cigarettes can lead to lung cancer. There isn't any proof that smoking weed will make you dumb. If there is I haven't seen it. And I've looked for it.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy-hippo"] That does not compair in any way because there is proof that cigarettes can lead to lung cancer. There isn't any proof that smoking weed will make you dumb. If there is I haven't seen it. And I've looked for it.

I'm seriously starting to think you must be high right now. It's like you're not even comprehending the words that I'm typing.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#146 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

The government doesn't care much about what 20 something hipsters think about the drug and don't want to make it legal just because they said so.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

I'm all eyes for any legitimate argument whatsoever.

I'm honestly starting tobelieve it's some kind of conspiracy.

Franklinstein

You answered it that stuff makes you paranoid.

Avatar image for svenus97
svenus97

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#148 svenus97
Member since 2009 • 2318 Posts

If one narcotic drug is illegal, and the other is legal, you should ask yourself why isn't the legal narcotic drug illegal, not the other way around. If this made any sense :P

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#149 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I'm sure there's a big moral component to why it's illegal. Marijuana is certainly not as harmful or dangerous as other recreational drugs, however there has always been a stigma attached to recreational substances. Even alcohol was banned at one point.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#150 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60837 Posts

To me, it's ridiculous, because any intelligent person I ask that question to says, "It should be legal"Franklinstein

pretty much this

there is absolutely no objective reason why marijuana should still be illegal.

thats not to say I think it shouldnt be regulated (sorry, I dont want it used in public...stoners/potheads are annoying at times), but I see no reason why a guy can't come home from work and smoke a bowl to relax, or go to a designated cafe and smoke, etc. I just dont want it in the street, or at work.