Avatar getting GREAT reviews - "The next Star Wars or LOTR"

  • 173 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Samurai_Xavier
Samurai_Xavier

4364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 Samurai_Xavier
Member since 2003 • 4364 Posts

[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="F1_2004"] Well quite easily. Invitations don't make themselves, someone does go through the list and invite professional reviewers and it's not too hard to look at their history and filter out the ones that give poor reviews.F1_2004
And how exactly does that stop the critics they left out giving the movie bad reviews? Kinda seems a bit pointless, don't you think

Oh come on now, do I really need to spell it out for you? The more positive reviews they get pre-release, the more hype they build up and more viewers they get on opening day/week. It's basically better than free advertising. To the other guy, I don't really see how they could invite every single critic in the world. That would be quite the feat. Various movies get a different number of pre-release reviews, I don't think it's a worldwide invitation, but I could be wrong. Not that I'm suggesting Avatar is a huge flop and all these reviewers are getting paid off, but just speculating on early reviews. There's a bit of that happening in videogame reviews too.

Obviously they dont invite every single critic in the world. But they DO screen the movie in advance to every critic from every major publication (newspapers, tv, internet, etc.) in all of United States. Again, this is done with every single movie. If they dont screen the movie in advance, it loses all crdibility.

Avatar image for Samurai_Xavier
Samurai_Xavier

4364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Samurai_Xavier
Member since 2003 • 4364 Posts

"An astonishing, breathtaking masterpiece. Cameron did it! It will easily surpass Titanic's box office. I think Cameron created a few new colors." - Victoria Alexander

Wow, this new review seems to go a little too far. But this seems pretty good:

"Not since Dorothy's Kansas farmhouse landed in Oz - 70 years ago - and the screen transformed from black-and-white to color - has there been such a magical, revelatory moment as the emergence of the planet Pandora in IMAX 3-D." - Susan Granger

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="Shiggums"]

How so? Because the screen is smaller and the sound is less loud?

To me, I'd rather watch a movie at home where the seats are comfortable and the floors are clean than in a theater which is the opposite.

Baranga

When a movie packs so much detail in a frame, you should see it in a theatre. 3D will be the norm for TVs and monitors in about a decade, but screen size is an obvious advantage of the cinemas.

Eh. Doesn't seem interesting to me. And I've found nothing lives up to the hype.
Avatar image for Dogswithguns
Dogswithguns

11359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#155 Dogswithguns
Member since 2007 • 11359 Posts
Can someone reply to my question, please.... has it played in your town yet?
Avatar image for Samurai_Xavier
Samurai_Xavier

4364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Samurai_Xavier
Member since 2003 • 4364 Posts

[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]

[QUOTE="Shiggums"]

Eh...no, I disagree. What difference does it make if you see it in a theater or in your own home? Plus, I live a life of no regrets

dreDREb13

The technology behind it is so incredible that it is something that you have to actually experience. You lose the "experience" if you watch it at home.

Why do people call the movie revolutionary? The technology they used for it is revolutionary, but it doesn't make the movie any better. It's just like today's game: You can make it look exactly like real life, but if the story sucks and the game isn't fun, then it shouldn't be deemed revolutionary.

First of all, what are you even talking about? Its a movie, not a game.

Second, have you not read the reviews? The story is also fantastic, and the characters are great.

Avatar image for CJL13
CJL13

19137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#157 CJL13
Member since 2005 • 19137 Posts

I think this "You can only see this movie in Digital 3D" craze is getting annoying. It's like bashing a movie for not being in color. I'm sure it'll look better in Digital 3D but if that's the only reason to see the movie then it must be a crappy movie to get by on only looks. :|

Avatar image for 6_volts
6_volts

5520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 6_volts
Member since 2008 • 5520 Posts

looks stupid to me. I don't want to watch blue monkeys get blown up. And I hate the Lord of the Rings.

magnax1
Agreed.
Avatar image for Zerocrossings
Zerocrossings

7988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#160 Zerocrossings
Member since 2006 • 7988 Posts

Meh, the trailer didnt impress me. Also find those big blue things an eyesore. I might check it out if the good reviews keep coming.

Avatar image for playstation2004
playstation2004

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 playstation2004
Member since 2004 • 4928 Posts
This is a definite must see for this year.
Avatar image for Samurai_Xavier
Samurai_Xavier

4364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Samurai_Xavier
Member since 2003 • 4364 Posts

[QUOTE="CJL13"]

I think this "You can only see this movie in Digital 3D" craze is getting annoying. It's like bashing a movie for not being in color. I'm sure it'll look better in Digital 3D but if that's the only reason to see the movie then it must be a crappy movie to get by on only looks. :|

dreDREb13

Exactly. I guarantee the reviews wouldn't be so positive if the movie was watched as a normal movie should be. You could argue that since it was made that way, it should have to be seen that way, but that's like saying a piece of art has to be seen through the eyes of the artist unless you want to call it great or bad. A movie shouldn't be reliant on the technology that was used to create it.

Well, most reviews are saying the film is amazing in IMAX 3D. So far, I haven't seen any reviewers mention how well the movie plays in normal theatres.

But again, the movie, AS A MOVIE, NOT JUST AS TECHNOLOGY, is getting a high amount of praise. For example, the story, the characters, the universe, everything.

Avatar image for not_wanted
not_wanted

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 not_wanted
Member since 2008 • 1990 Posts

"An astonishing, breathtaking masterpiece. Cameron did it! It will easily surpass Titanic's box office. I think Cameron created a few new colors." - Victoria Alexander

Wow, this new review seems to go a little too far. But this seems pretty good:

"Not since Dorothy's Kansas farmhouse landed in Oz - 70 years ago - and the screen transformed from black-and-white to color - has there been such a magical, revelatory moment as the emergence of the planet Pandora in IMAX 3-D." - Susan Granger

Samurai_Xavier

"It will easily surpass Ttitanic's box office". :lol: A little too far? They lost all credibility. It has to make almost $2 billion.

This must be the best movie ever made.:o

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#165 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

Plot looks kind of stupid...Evil humans ( Americans,naturally) attempt to oppress/exterminate natives ( Blue aliens) in a gungho military manner for some magic rocks.

After hearing the line "Shock and Awe" was in the movie I immediately figured it would try to hard to send some sort of message about humanity.

We all know,

Oppressing native people for resources = bad. :roll:

Avatar image for Samurai_Xavier
Samurai_Xavier

4364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 Samurai_Xavier
Member since 2003 • 4364 Posts

Plot looks kind of stupid...Evil humans ( Americans,naturally) attempt to oppress/exterminate natives ( Blue aliens) in a gungho military manner for some magic rocks.

After hearing the line "Shock and Awe" was in the movie I immediately figured it would try to hard to send some sort of message about humanity.

We all know,

Oppressing native people for resources = bad. :roll:

UnknownSniper65

Oh, you've seent he movie?

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#167 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

This is a definite must see for this year.playstation2004
Going by how movies are in 2009, I agree.:)

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#169 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts

[QUOTE="dreDREb13"][QUOTE="CJL13"]

I think this "You can only see this movie in Digital 3D" craze is getting annoying. It's like bashing a movie for not being in color. I'm sure it'll look better in Digital 3D but if that's the only reason to see the movie then it must be a crappy movie to get by on only looks. :|

Samurai_Xavier

Exactly. I guarantee the reviews wouldn't be so positive if the movie was watched as a normal movie should be. You could argue that since it was made that way, it should have to be seen that way, but that's like saying a piece of art has to be seen through the eyes of the artist unless you want to call it great or bad. A movie shouldn't be reliant on the technology that was used to create it.

Well, most reviews are saying the film is amazing in IMAX 3D. So far, I haven't seen any reviewers mention how well the movie plays in normal theatres.

But again, the movie, AS A MOVIE, NOT JUST AS TECHNOLOGY, is getting a high amount of praise. For example, the story, the characters, the universe, everything.

Empire mentioned at the end of their (5 star) review that the movie is a great one in 2D already, but in 3D it is mindblowing.
Avatar image for deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c
deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c

6504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#170 deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c
Member since 2005 • 6504 Posts
I heard it has unobtainium, so it sounds more like the next "The Core" to me.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#171 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Unobtanium is a real term used by scientists since the 1950s for rare or theoretical materials.

Avatar image for Mario2007
Mario2007

2520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#172 Mario2007
Member since 2005 • 2520 Posts
Is this movie going to be in 2D as well? Because I can't see movies in 3D due to an eye problem.
Avatar image for CJL13
CJL13

19137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#173 CJL13
Member since 2005 • 19137 Posts

Is this movie going to be in 2D as well? Because I can't see movies in 3D due to an eye problem. Mario2007

Yes.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#175 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts

Seeing it this Friday!

:o

Avatar image for Drakes_Fortune
Drakes_Fortune

5259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Drakes_Fortune
Member since 2009 • 5259 Posts
Im surprised and careful. Im still not excepecting something that great, and defenetly not at LotR and SW level.
Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#177 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts
its going to be epic