I'm still on the fence about this. My adolescent/child Psychology professor gave me a fair argument for spanking. Before a certain age, we cannot cognitively determine the risk factors associated with things that may cause us physical harm or death.
Spanking a child a second or two after they have done something that may cause them harm actually guides them away from it at a young age. As much as I don't like spanking, in the few years before a child develops understanding of advanced systems, spanking does give them a logical punitive measure that they can understand from an early age that keeps them from behaving in a way that may cause them unforeseeable harm.
The same goes for lower mammals. When you train a dog not to crap on the floor, you don't rub his nose in it if its been more than 10 minutes since they did it; that just teaches them to avoid you. You reward them for going outside instead of punishing them for going inside.
After a certain age however, it's best to move on to a cognitive explanation of what they did wrong rather than spanking. It has a much better effect on the child and will guide their understanding in the future.
Log in to comment