The question in and of itself is a logical fallacy.
The question is akin to asking God to destroy himself to prove he is God.
The question is idiotic by people who's best evidence against God is to bring up Santa Clause, the easter bunny, flying spaghetti monsters or whatever dawkins can dream up.This question is often used against the existence of God.If God cannot lift a rock too heavy to lift, then he is not omnipotent.Nothing is beyong God's power, nothing but the logically impossible.The question is asking whether or not God can do the logically impossible, which is a meaningless question.
- Can God make a vhiacle that moves so fast he cannot catch it?
- Can God bake a cake so big he cannot eat it?
- Can God create a being equal to itself?
These questions amount to whether or not God can do something that God cannot do. Or can God find the limits of his limitless abilities?
This is called a fallacy of contradictory premises.Can God do the possible? Of course.
Can God do the logically impossible? No. Circular triangles FTW.
The heavy rock question is interesting to theists, since it makes them aware that people can think up bullcrap questions if they sit in a room for weeks at a time.This rock argument is hilarious at best. Crappy atheistic arguments FTW.
Log in to comment