[QUOTE="guynamedbilly"]Historical events aren't supernatural. There is no proof in history that the supernatural exists.MatrixSamurai27
Mere assertion. Reasons to back up that assertion?
Why would you put the same criteria on the supernatural as you would the natural?guynamedbilly
Okay, this is pretty simple. The first Christians claimed Jesus rose from the dead in real life (in history). Not spiritually, not in their minds, hearts, or whatever. How else are do you think they're supposed to show that this happened to future generations? We know of other historical events because people wrote about them.
You expect me to find archaeological evidence or find a quote from an ancient king that magic doesn't exist? How would I do that exactly? We can't proceed any further in this thought because you clearly believe the bible to be an accurate historical recording of events, when the only reason you believe that is because you follow the religion and because the Bible told you that it was accurate.As to the second quote, it's the same problem as the first. People also wrote about wizards and dragons, elves, flying carpets, genies, and mystical sea creatures at the edges of the oceans. I could never base my meaning of existence on something someone just told me about. I'd have to experience it for myself.
As for a visual demonstration of Jesus revealing himself being too direct, maybe so but I don't care. I don't understand the logic behind believing in a savior who wants people to love him and whom he wants to save from eternal damnation, but wants to put these little hurdles along the way. It makes no sense in the natural order of things and I am a natural being, so I can't accept that. If he really wanted people to love him and his creation and be saved, why wouldn't he make it as easy as possible for them to do so? And so I guess the counterargument is that we can never know the mind of god and his ways are higher than our ways, to which I say. Ok, not interested then.
Log in to comment