Church Tells HIV Patients To Stop Treatment. At Least 6 Die As a Result.

  • 163 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Labavo
Labavo

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Labavo
Member since 2012 • 443 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] I knew he was trolling from his first thread. This just provided extra evidence with the second thread. And OT falls for it....

Then why you so mad, bro?

I'm not mad bro. I'm chill and happy. You seem a bit hot under the collar though? Is that your insecurities projecting your emotions on me bro?

Nope, I'm just posting factual information (i.e. God doesn't exist).
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts
[QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="alexside1"][QUOTE="Labavo"] The proof that there is no God is the proof that there isn't any proof of one.

.....HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAH I never imagine that one day an atheist would resort to this argument.

So I have to disprove the existence of a god? Well, if that's the case, I can levitate objects with my mind. Prove that I can't.

Yes. When you make an absolute statement you should be able to provide the proof of such statement. Otherwise.....you're just talking out your ass.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts
[QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Labavo"] Then why you so mad, bro?

I'm not mad bro. I'm chill and happy. You seem a bit hot under the collar though? Is that your insecurities projecting your emotions on me bro?

Nope, I'm just posting factual information (i.e. God doesn't exist).

Proof? Or more ass talking?
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

:lol:

Its official: you are the worst troll in existence

Wolf-Man2006

No. He's a literate person who understands where the burden of proof lies.

Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Labavo"] The proof that there is no God is the proof that there isn't any proof of one.

That's not proof. So do you have any? Or are you just trying to troll more?

There's no proof that a flying, pooping ice cream cone with sharp, silver claws and poo-brown eyes doesn't exist, but you don't believe in one because there's no proof that there is none. If the very basis for believing something is that there's no proof going against it, you might as well believe in anything.

Hey kiddo, most atheist have a lack of faith in god. It does not akin to believing that there is no god. Get your act straighten out.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I'm talking about the Church as an institution not as Jesus intended.musicalmac
Well like I said, the "Church" isn't an institution. You're not talking about anything. Which I've come to understand is quite normal for you.

The Theology of Liberation only started as a reaction against the Catholic Church which FYI is an institution. There are many institutionalized christian churches out there. The Theology of Liberation reaction though is a generalized reaction against all those institutions which focus on doing things like those on the video and don't focus on the important issues.
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts
[QUOTE="Labavo"] The proof that there is no God is the proof that there isn't any proof of one.

You can't prove a negative.....oh wait.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#58 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
This is a terrible thread...
Avatar image for Labavo
Labavo

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 Labavo
Member since 2012 • 443 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="alexside1"] .....HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAH I never imagine that one day an atheist would resort to this argument.

So I have to disprove the existence of a god? Well, if that's the case, I can levitate objects with my mind. Prove that I can't.

Yes. When you make an absolute statement you should be able to provide the proof of such statement. Otherwise.....you're just talking out your ass.

So then prove to me there's a god and that religious people aren't just talking out of their ass.
Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts

[QUOTE="Wolf-Man2006"]

:lol:

Its official: you are the worst troll in existence

LordQuorthon

No. He's a literate person who understands where the burden of proof lies.

Of course he's the most brilliant mind that there is.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts
[QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Labavo"] So I have to disprove the existence of a god? Well, if that's the case, I can levitate objects with my mind. Prove that I can't.

Yes. When you make an absolute statement you should be able to provide the proof of such statement. Otherwise.....you're just talking out your ass.

So then prove to me there's a god and that religious people aren't just talking out of their ass.

I have made no such statements in this thread. However, you have. So the burden of proof is on you. Where is the proof of your "facts"? It it's fact....there must be proof. You're up.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
So your idea of a church is one without central tenets?LJS9502_basic
I never said that, any organized religion is basically institutionalized, they have a structure.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

[QUOTE="Wolf-Man2006"]

:lol:

Its official: you are the worst troll in existence

LordQuorthon

No. He's a literate person who understands where the burden of proof lies.

Yes. It lies with the individual making the statements of fact. Which he did. Thus the burden lies with him. And he doesn't understand that so you and he are both wrong about that aspect.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#64 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
I never said that, any organized religion is basically institutionalized, they have a structure.kuraimen
"Church" is not an organized religion. This is so bad, special levels of bad.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Christian Scientists (I am assuming its specifically that church, because those are the ones infamous for denying themselves health care) baffle me.. They claim its all in god's hands.. But couldn't one argue that the healthcare and technology we have today is a direct result of god's hand to begin with?
Avatar image for Labavo
Labavo

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 Labavo
Member since 2012 • 443 Posts

[QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] That's not proof. So do you have any? Or are you just trying to troll more?alexside1
There's no proof that a flying, pooping ice cream cone with sharp, silver claws and poo-brown eyes doesn't exist, but you don't believe in one because there's no proof that there is none. If the very basis for believing something is that there's no proof going against it, you might as well believe in anything.

Hey kiddo, most atheist have a lack of faith in god. It does not akin to believing that there is no god. Get your act straighten out.

Of course nothing is absolute. Scientifically speaking, there might very well be unicorns. We don't necessarily dismiss anything. We're just 99.999999999999999999999999% sure it doesn't exist.

If I said a polka-dotted, flying, talking dog with 5000 eyes, 3000 legs, 3000 arms, and 2000 noses didn't exist, you wouldn't object in such a manner. "Oh, well he might! You don't know that for sure! Therefore, you can't make an absolute claim." The fact is, there's also a 00.000000000000000000000001% chance that you don't exist and a 100% chance that I slept with your mom last night.

Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

Of course he's the most brilliant mind that there is.alexside1

Likely not. But undestanding how the burden of proof works is a step in the right direction.

Here's how it works: VAMPIRES EXIST BECUZ U CANT PROVE THAT DEY DUN EXIST LOL isn't exactly the smartest thing to say. Vampires, of course, can be god, werewolves, demons, Zeus, Odin, Quetzalcoatl, or zombies and the sentence would be just as dumb. You can't prove that Zeus doesn't exist, but that doesn't make him real.

It's logic. And logic tends to be very simple and elegant, even though some people insist on being immune to it.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

i bet if the church told them to jump off a bridge, they'd do that too.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

[QUOTE="alexside1"] Of course he's the most brilliant mind that there is.LordQuorthon

Likely not. But undestanding how the burden of proof works is a step in the right direction.

Here's how it works: VAMPIRES EXIST BECUZ U CANT PROVE THAT DEY DUN EXIST LOL isn't exactly the smartest thing to say. Vampires, of course, can be god, werewolves, demons, Zeus, Odin, Quetzalcoatl, or zombies and the sentence would be just as dumb. You can't prove that Zeus doesn't exist, but that doesn't make him real.

It's logic. And logic tends to be very simple and elegant, even though some people insist on being immune to it.

You are wrong. The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person making a "factual" statement. Period.
Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts

Yeah cuz people don't die of AIDS no matter what.

Death is inevitable.

It's how you live that defines you, not how you die.

Avatar image for almasdeathchild
almasdeathchild

8922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#71 almasdeathchild
Member since 2011 • 8922 Posts

pff....religion they tell their people to jump and they jump.....GG guys really.....

Avatar image for Labavo
Labavo

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 Labavo
Member since 2012 • 443 Posts

[QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

[QUOTE="alexside1"] Of course he's the most brilliant mind that there is.LJS9502_basic

Likely not. But undestanding how the burden of proof works is a step in the right direction.

Here's how it works: VAMPIRES EXIST BECUZ U CANT PROVE THAT DEY DUN EXIST LOL isn't exactly the smartest thing to say. Vampires, of course, can be god, werewolves, demons, Zeus, Odin, Quetzalcoatl, or zombies and the sentence would be just as dumb. You can't prove that Zeus doesn't exist, but that doesn't make him real.

It's logic. And logic tends to be very simple and elegant, even though some people insist on being immune to it.

You are wrong. The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person making a "factual" statement. Period.

I bet when you're mom told you that Santa Clause wasn't real shortly after I was done with her at the age of 40, you were like, "Well, you can't disprove him! You're making a statement, the burden of proof is on you. SANTA CLAUSE IS REAL!!! ARGAHAHEAHHE!!!"

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I never said that, any organized religion is basically institutionalized, they have a structure.musicalmac
"Church" is not an organized religion. This is so bad, special levels of bad.

When I was talking about the Church I was talking about the institution. People call the institution the Church all the time it is even recognized as such a term. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Church#Visible_and_the_invisible_church "contrasts with the "visible church"-that is, the institutional body on earth which preaches the gospel and administers the sacraments." "The visible church may also refer to an association of particular churches from multiple locations who unite themselves under a common charter and set of governmental principles. The church in the visible sense is often governed by office-bearers carrying titles such as minister, pastor, teacher, elder, and deacon."
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

You are wrong. The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person making a "factual" statement. Period.LJS9502_basic

So, Zeus can both exist and not exist unless I say that he doesn't exist; then he exists and I have to prove that he doesn't?

You really are a smart cookie, champ.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

Likely not. But undestanding how the burden of proof works is a step in the right direction.

Here's how it works: VAMPIRES EXIST BECUZ U CANT PROVE THAT DEY DUN EXIST LOL isn't exactly the smartest thing to say. Vampires, of course, can be god, werewolves, demons, Zeus, Odin, Quetzalcoatl, or zombies and the sentence would be just as dumb. You can't prove that Zeus doesn't exist, but that doesn't make him real.

It's logic. And logic tends to be very simple and elegant, even though some people insist on being immune to it.

Labavo

You are wrong. The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person making a "factual" statement. Period.

I bet when you're mom told you that Santa Clause wasn't real shortly after I was done with her at the age of 40, you were like, "Well, you can't disprove him! You're making a statement, the burden of proof is on you. SANTA CLAUSE IS REAL!!! ARGAHAHEAHHE!!!"

How old are you seriously?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] You are wrong. The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person making a "factual" statement. Period.LordQuorthon

So, Zeus can both exist and not exist unless I say that he doesn't exist; then he exists and I have to prove that he doesn't?

You really are a smart cookie, champ.

Whether or not Zeus exists is not dependent on your beliefs....
Avatar image for PresidentLogan
PresidentLogan

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 PresidentLogan
Member since 2007 • 267 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Labavo"] The proof that there is no God is the proof that there isn't any proof of one.Labavo
That's not proof. So do you have any? Or are you just trying to troll more?

There's no proof that a flying, pooping ice cream cone with sharp, silver claws and poo-brown eyes doesn't exist, but you don't believe in one because there's no proof that there is none. If the very basis for believing something is that there's no proof going against it, you might as well believe in anything.

I Agree.

There is no sensible proof of god as mentioned in the bible exists.

For religous oddballs to come back with "you prove he does not exist" is a total cop out.

Where was god mentioned for thousands of years before Judaism and other races worshipped multiple gods?

According to the bible god created universe - man in seven days. What about dinosaurs?

The Gospels were not putto paperuntil 100 to300 years after Jesus died.

Pope Alexander the whatever - Borgia and many other popes have been less than "holy"

Please tell me where I can go to find proof of God - Not nature not evolution - God

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#78 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
When I was talking about the Church I was talking about the institution. People call the institution the Church all the time it is even recognized as such a term. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Church#Visible_and_the_invisible_church "contrasts with the "visible church"-that is, the institutional body on earth which preaches the gospel and administers the sacraments." "The visible church may also refer to an association of particular churches from multiple locations who unite themselves under a common charter and set of governmental principles. The church in the visible sense is often governed by office-bearers carrying titles such as minister, pastor, teacher, elder, and deacon."kuraimen
There is no such thing as the "Church" institution. It is impossible to generalize the "Church" as a whole. For goodness sakes, we're only looking at Christian institutions. Know how many other kinds of "church" there are?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

[QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] That's not proof. So do you have any? Or are you just trying to troll more?PresidentLogan

There's no proof that a flying, pooping ice cream cone with sharp, silver claws and poo-brown eyes doesn't exist, but you don't believe in one because there's no proof that there is none. If the very basis for believing something is that there's no proof going against it, you might as well believe in anything.

I Agree.

There is no sensible proof of god as mentioned in the bible exists.

For religous oddballs to come back with "you prove he does not exist" is a total cop out.

Where was god mentioned for thousands of years before Judaism and other races worshipped multiple gods?

According to the bible god created universe - man in seven days. What about dinosaurs?

The Gospels were not putto paperuntil 100 to300 years after Jesus died.

Pope Alexander the whatever - Borgia and many other popes have been less than "holy"

Please tell me where I can go to find proof of God - Not nature not evolution - God

You can agree all you want.....you still can't prove you're right.
Avatar image for PresidentLogan
PresidentLogan

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 PresidentLogan
Member since 2007 • 267 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

Likely not. But undestanding how the burden of proof works is a step in the right direction.

Here's how it works: VAMPIRES EXIST BECUZ U CANT PROVE THAT DEY DUN EXIST LOL isn't exactly the smartest thing to say. Vampires, of course, can be god, werewolves, demons, Zeus, Odin, Quetzalcoatl, or zombies and the sentence would be just as dumb. You can't prove that Zeus doesn't exist, but that doesn't make him real.

It's logic. And logic tends to be very simple and elegant, even though some people insist on being immune to it.

Labavo

You are wrong. The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person making a "factual" statement. Period.

I bet when you're mom told you that Santa Clause wasn't real shortly after I was done with her at the age of 40, you were like, "Well, you can't disprove him! You're making a statement, the burden of proof is on you. SANTA CLAUSE IS REAL!!! ARGAHAHEAHHE!!!"

Perfect comeback

Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

Likely not. But undestanding how the burden of proof works is a step in the right direction.

Here's how it works: VAMPIRES EXIST BECUZ U CANT PROVE THAT DEY DUN EXIST LOL isn't exactly the smartest thing to say. Vampires, of course, can be god, werewolves, demons, Zeus, Odin, Quetzalcoatl, or zombies and the sentence would be just as dumb. You can't prove that Zeus doesn't exist, but that doesn't make him real.

It's logic. And logic tends to be very simple and elegant, even though some people insist on being immune to it.

Labavo

You are wrong. The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person making a "factual" statement. Period.

I bet when you're mom told you that Santa Clause wasn't real shortly after I was done with her at the age of 40, you were like, "Well, you can't disprove him! You're making a statement, the burden of proof is on you. SANTA CLAUSE IS REAL!!! ARGAHAHEAHHE!!!"

:shock::lol: trolololololooooo
Avatar image for PresidentLogan
PresidentLogan

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 PresidentLogan
Member since 2007 • 267 Posts

[QUOTE="PresidentLogan"]

[QUOTE="Labavo"] There's no proof that a flying, pooping ice cream cone with sharp, silver claws and poo-brown eyes doesn't exist, but you don't believe in one because there's no proof that there is none. If the very basis for believing something is that there's no proof going against it, you might as well believe in anything.LJS9502_basic

I Agree.

There is no sensible proof of god as mentioned in the bible exists.

For religous oddballs to come back with "you prove he does not exist" is a total cop out.

Where was god mentioned for thousands of years before Judaism and other races worshipped multiple gods?

According to the bible god created universe - man in seven days. What about dinosaurs?

The Gospels were not putto paperuntil 100 to300 years after Jesus died.

Pope Alexander the whatever - Borgia and many other popes have been less than "holy"

Please tell me where I can go to find proof of God - Not nature not evolution - God

You can agree all you want.....you still can't prove you're right.

I can though because there is NO EVIDENCE PLUS THE OTHER STUFF I MENTIONED ABOVE

Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

Whether or not Zeus exists is not dependent on your beliefs....LJS9502_basic

No. It depends on whether he exists or not and, until he shows his face on TV and tells us all about how great it was to pork his sister or we see him rocking arenas around the world with his mad guitar skills, it is a fact that he doesn't exist.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] When I was talking about the Church I was talking about the institution. People call the institution the Church all the time it is even recognized as such a term. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Church#Visible_and_the_invisible_church "contrasts with the "visible church"-that is, the institutional body on earth which preaches the gospel and administers the sacraments." "The visible church may also refer to an association of particular churches from multiple locations who unite themselves under a common charter and set of governmental principles. The church in the visible sense is often governed by office-bearers carrying titles such as minister, pastor, teacher, elder, and deacon."musicalmac
There is no such thing as the "Church" institution. It is impossible to generalize the "Church" as a whole. For goodness sakes, we're only looking at Christian institutions. Know how many other kinds of "church" there are?

Of course it is possible. If you are referring to organized institutions people refer to all the time as the Church. This was a thread about christians so I thought it was obvious I was talking about institutionalized Christianity first and foremost and the Theology of Liberation is a christian movement. We are now arguing semantics. I was talking about the Church in general as institutionalized christian entities, if you don't believe me well too bad.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Whether or not Zeus exists is not dependent on your beliefs....LordQuorthon

No. It depends on whether he exists or not and, until he shows his face on TV and tells us all about how great it was to pork his sister or we see him rocking arenas around the world with his mad guitar skills, it is a fact that he doesn't exist.

Your opinions you mean? I can't take that as proof dude. I mean I can think you're an overweight 40 year old virgin in mom's basement. I have no proof any of that is true. But since I have no proof it isn't....using your logic.....I'm dead on.
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="Labavo"][QUOTE="alexside1"] .....HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAH I never imagine that one day an atheist would resort to this argument.LJS9502_basic
So I have to disprove the existence of a god? Well, if that's the case, I can levitate objects with my mind. Prove that I can't.

Yes. When you make an absolute statement you should be able to provide the proof of such statement. Otherwise.....you're just talking out your ass.

Wat, you can't take that route for the argument. You, and no one else, has any evidence that confirms the existence of any god.

"You have no proof"
"Oh yea, well, you have no proof that proves that there is no proof -- yea!"

And because it's impossible to prove that a god doesn't exist, under the supremely bs 'logic' that god beliefs are based on, you have to prove it to everyone else. We could list every conflicting result from science and any god's existence, and still get argued with, needlessly, by the 'non-thinking' that is faith.

(and don't take it as an absolute, it's tedious to explain that something is 99.999...% certain)

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Labavo"] So I have to disprove the existence of a god? Well, if that's the case, I can levitate objects with my mind. Prove that I can't.Inconsistancy

Yes. When you make an absolute statement you should be able to provide the proof of such statement. Otherwise.....you're just talking out your ass.

Wat, you can't take that route for the argument. You, and no one else, has any evidence that confirms the existence of any god.

"You have no proof"
"Oh yea, well, you have no proof that proves that there is no proof -- yea!"

And because it's impossible to prove that a god doesn't exist, under the supremely bs 'logic' that god beliefs are based on, you have to prove it to everyone else. We could list every conflicting result from science and any god's existence, and still get argued with, needlessl at is faith.

No one made that argument. He, however, stated his opinion was fact. He does have to provide the facts. Otherwise what ever we believe is fact. It doesn't work that way. Atheist?

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#89 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
Of course it is possible. If you are referring to organized institutions people refer to all the time as the Church. This was a thread about christians so I thought it was obvious I was talking about institutionalized Christianity first and foremost and the Theology of Liberation is a christian movement. We are now arguing semantics. I was talking about the Church in general as institutionalized christian entities, if you don't believe me well too bad.kuraimen
Don't believe you about what? What you believe in doesn't exist. By your own standards, you can't believe yourself. :?
Avatar image for AussieePet
AussieePet

11424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#90 AussieePet
Member since 2010 • 11424 Posts
Do people with HIV still have sex?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Of course it is possible. If you are referring to organized institutions people refer to all the time as the Church. This was a thread about christians so I thought it was obvious I was talking about institutionalized Christianity first and foremost and the Theology of Liberation is a christian movement. We are now arguing semantics. I was talking about the Church in general as institutionalized christian entities, if you don't believe me well too bad.musicalmac
Don't believe you about what? What you believe in doesn't exist. By your own standards, you can't believe yourself. :?

I just quoted a source where the term is used as I intended :|
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#93 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
I just quoted a source where the term is used as I intended :|kuraimen
A source that stated there were many different "Church" institutions, not one, singular "Church" entity.
Do people with HIV still have sex?AussieePet
Yes. Some more responsibly than others...
Avatar image for gubrushadow
gubrushadow

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 gubrushadow
Member since 2009 • 2735 Posts

Do people with HIV still have sex?AussieePet

An advice: DON'T POST PLEASE! that's for your own good.

Avatar image for AussieePet
AussieePet

11424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#95 AussieePet
Member since 2010 • 11424 Posts
[QUOTE="AussieePet"]Do people with HIV still have sex?thegerg
That's the main way that it spreads, dummy.

I meant if they know they have it and both people have HIV
Avatar image for AussieePet
AussieePet

11424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#96 AussieePet
Member since 2010 • 11424 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I just quoted a source where the term is used as I intended :|musicalmac
A source that stated there were many different "Church" institutions, not one, singular "Church" entity.
Do people with HIV still have sex?AussieePet
Yes. Some more responsibly than others...

So what happens if two people With HIV have sex ?
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

Your opinions you mean?LJS9502_basic

It's a fact until proven otherwise. That is how logic works and that is why faith has nothing to do with logic. That doesn't make faith inherently good or bad, it just happens to walk an entirely different path that is not related to logic.

What really amazes me about believers is that they are almost physically unable to be content with their faith. They have to use broken logic to go to the Internet and "prove" non-believers that their illogical beliefs are true. I say that's just doubt... And when it comes to faith, doubt is understandable; just keep it to yourself and let other people be.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180244 Posts

There is no sensible proof of god as mentioned in the bible exists. No proof He doesn't either.

For religous oddballs to come back with "you prove he does not exist" is a total cop out. It's a cop out for militant atheists to hide behind the existence as a one way street. Making any statement as a fact means you have to provide the proof of said facts. Belief is not fact.

Where was god mentioned for thousands of years before Judaism and other races worshipped multiple gods? You can say it wasn't known? You can only say there is no exidence due to lack of written text. They are not the same thing. Multiple vs single doesn't mean humans didn't believe differently about the same thing.

According to the bible god created universe - man in seven days. What about dinosaurs? The bible was not, is not, and will not, be considered a science book. Seven days are more like ages by the way.

The Gospels were not putto paperuntil 100 to300 years after Jesus died. Much of day to day living and teaching was not written down. However, word of mouth does not negate the teachings. The first gospel was written roughly 65-70 AD. Jesus is estimated to have been crucified roughly 30 AD give or take. That's not a big gap.

Pope Alexander the whatever - Borgia and many other popes have been less than "holy" Yes. Shocking humans are flawed and no one is above bad acts.The church made reforms after the Borgias.

Please tell me where I can go to find proof of God - Not nature not evolution - God God is found through faith. Not scientific evidence. No one has stated otherwise in this thread.

PresidentLogan

I don't like to co mingle but that seemed easiest.

Avatar image for almasdeathchild
almasdeathchild

8922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#99 almasdeathchild
Member since 2011 • 8922 Posts

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="AussieePet"]Do people with HIV still have sex?AussieePet
That's the main way that it spreads, dummy.

I meant if they know they have it and both people have HIV

im not saying they use condoms but they probably use condoms

Avatar image for AussieePet
AussieePet

11424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#100 AussieePet
Member since 2010 • 11424 Posts

[QUOTE="AussieePet"]Do people with HIV still have sex?gubrushadow

An advice: DON'T POST PLEASE! that's for your own good.

Huh? you must be confused, Im asking if 2 people have HIv would they still have sex?