This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Dipsomania"]I'm ok with most non smoking laws... I don't like the bar ones though, most people who don't smoke will smoke when they go out to drink. Around here they have "clubs" where you can go and drink and be able to smoke inside, but I think it should be the other way around when it comes to bars (especially after a certain hour when food is no longer being served) because a majority of the people that go to the bar smoke. Sure 2nd hand smoke may cause cancer, but it's not like "fresh air" doesn't have carcinogens as well...ROLFCHANKI know lots of people that enjoy going to the bar that do not smoke.... anecdotal evidence is the best kind, isn't it? that also does a great job of refuting his point that "most" people at bars smoke, not "all". I was making a general comment....not arguing with him. However, the percentage of smokers is less than the percentage of nonsmokers.
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="ROLFCHANK"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="lord_mordain"]If there is one thing I can learn from this thread, is that non-smokers that have never smoked are very uptight.ROLFCHANKNo....but why should we have to breathe in your smoke? Seems smokers complain about rights but don't consider rights on the other side of the equation. If you need to smoke....do it in private. No need to pollute the air for others. If smokers had been courteous it would never have come to laws. this isnt about smokers' or nonsmokers' rights. its about the rights of business owners to operate their businesses as they see fit, period. Business regulation is necessary. You could just as easily argue for the legalization of heroin. first off, public smoking = heroin? no. try again. second off, and this is an aside, but i am for the legalization of all drugs and prostitution. but that is another matter. My point is that businesses can't just have whatever they want.
Nope....LJS9502_basic
I was making a general comment....not arguing with him. However, the percentage of smokers is less than the percentage of nonsmokers.LJS9502_basicAll based on surveys and we both know people do lie, and I know there are a good number of people who do not smoke. But I would still say there are more people who do smoke than who do not. Because casual/social smokers are more apt to say they don't smoke at all when asked for poll/survey reasons. But I have known alot of people that do not smoke that do smoke when they get drinking. I agree people shouldn't smoke in eating establishments, and I wouldn't mind bars not allowing smoking until say 10:00 p.m. because alot of bars serve food, and some have a very good menu and have families come there to eat. It's just my personal opinion, and yes I am a smoker, but also I live in a house with small children so I smoke outside, because they don't have a choice and it is more healtny for them to do so. But also there are about 2 million ways to get cancer, smoking isn't the only way
With public places I mean, pubs, restaurants, snackbars, sportscentres,...I think smoking should be banned in public areas. I bet i'm not the only one here who is tired of breathing in smoke all the time.
Anyway I hate it when people smoke when I'm close to them, I have astma and the smoke takes a huge impact on my lungs.
I love sports and I worked a lot to improve my condition, but when someone smokes near me, I can still feel the impact 2 hours later.
Also Babies get sick from the smoke comming from the sigaret.
Pragnent woman breathing in smoke have higher chance of having a baby with bronchitis or astma.
Also nobody likes when someone is smoking nearby where you are eating.
Why do people start smoking in the first place?
Sensui1986
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Nope....Dipsomania
I was making a general comment....not arguing with him. However, the percentage of smokers is less than the percentage of nonsmokers.LJS9502_basicAll based on surveys and we both know people do lie, and I know there are a good number of people who do not smoke. But I would still say there are more people who do smoke than who do not. Because casual/social smokers are more apt to say they don't smoke at all when asked for poll/survey reasons. But I have known alot of people that do not smoke that do smoke when they get drinking. I agree people shouldn't smoke in eating establishments, and I wouldn't mind bars not allowing smoking until say 10:00 p.m. because alot of bars serve food, and some have a very good menu and have families come there to eat. It's just my personal opinion, and yes I am a smoker, but also I live in a house with small children so I smoke outside, because they don't have a choice and it is more healtny for them to do so. But also there are about 2 million ways to get cancer, smoking isn't the only way
Casual smokers? If there is such a thing it would be a very small percentage. Smoking is highly addictive...so one is not casual about it. Again.....smokers are a smaller percentage of the population. Most people that smoke when drinking were smokers back in the day and the alcohol brings back the craving. But regular non smokers don't smoke just because they were drinking....and no, there is no reason to lie about smoking on a survey.:roll:
Doesn't matter whether smoking is only one way to get sick....it shouldn't be an issue for non smokers. Why is it so hard for a smoker to get up and go outside for a minute for his fix?
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Nope....Dipsomania
I was making a general comment....not arguing with him. However, the percentage of smokers is less than the percentage of nonsmokers.LJS9502_basicAll based on surveys and we both know people do lie, and I know there are a good number of people who do not smoke. But I would still say there are more people who do smoke than who do not. Because casual/social smokers are more apt to say they don't smoke at all when asked for poll/survey reasons. But I have known alot of people that do not smoke that do smoke when they get drinking. I agree people shouldn't smoke in eating establishments, and I wouldn't mind bars not allowing smoking until say 10:00 p.m. because alot of bars serve food, and some have a very good menu and have families come there to eat. It's just my personal opinion, and yes I am a smoker, but also I live in a house with small children so I smoke outside, because they don't have a choice and it is more healtny for them to do so. But also there are about 2 million ways to get cancer, smoking isn't the only way :lol: are you saying that the majority of people do smoke? Thats got to be a joke. and as a smoker, living in Canada, where smoking has been banned in every public place except for outdoors away from building entrances. I don't mind stepping outside, and neither should you, if it can save a non-smoker from cancer.
Casual smokers? If there is such a thing it would be a very small percentage. Smoking is highly addictive...so one is not casual about it. Again.....smokers are a smaller percentage of the population. Most people that smoke when drinking were smokers back in the day and the alcohol brings back the craving. But regular non smokers don't smoke just because they were drinking....and no, there is no reason to lie about smoking on a survey.:roll:The condescending approach won't work with me :roll: I've been out and around enough to know people who would normally not smoke to smoke when they go out drinking. Everyone knows smoking is addictive, along with caffeine and a bunch of other substances. I feel you are being biased because you are an obvious non smoker. I am a smoker who is considerate of those who do not smoke. And I agree alot of places should require smokers to smoke outside, I just think a bar shouldn't be one of those places. Because people who go out and drink on a regular basis tend to be smokers more than non smokers. And that is coming from going out to different bars in different areas accross the U.S.Doesn't matter whether smoking is only one way to get sick....it shouldn't be an issue for non smokers. Why is it so hard for a smoker to get up and go outside for a minute for his fix?LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Dipsomania"]I'm ok with most non smoking laws... I don't like the bar ones though, most people who don't smoke will smoke when they go out to drink. Around here they have "clubs" where you can go and drink and be able to smoke inside, but I think it should be the other way around when it comes to bars (especially after a certain hour when food is no longer being served) because a majority of the people that go to the bar smoke. Sure 2nd hand smoke may cause cancer, but it's not like "fresh air" doesn't have carcinogens as well...ROLFCHANKI know lots of people that enjoy going to the bar that do not smoke.... anecdotal evidence is the best kind, isn't it? that also does a great job of refuting his point that "most" people at bars smoke, not "all". Yeah, his "point" that most people smoke at bars was well supported, huh? I think not. Dipsomania's claim that most people smoke at bars is just as credible as LJ's claim that he knows lots of people that go to the bars and don't smoke. Neither had any support, thus we shouldn't give much weight to either one. Please be consistent in your criticizms--you shouldn't just correct the people you disagree with. It makes you look ignorant.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Casual smokers? If there is such a thing it would be a very small percentage. Smoking is highly addictive...so one is not casual about it. Again.....smokers are a smaller percentage of the population. Most people that smoke when drinking were smokers back in the day and the alcohol brings back the craving. But regular non smokers don't smoke just because they were drinking....and no, there is no reason to lie about smoking on a survey.:roll:The condescending approach won't work with me :roll: I've been out and around enough to know people who would normally not smoke to smoke when they go out drinking. Everyone knows smoking is addictive, along with caffeine and a bunch of other substances. I feel you are being biased because you are an obvious non smoker. I am a smoker who is considerate of those who do not smoke. And I agree alot of places should require smokers to smoke outside, I just think a bar shouldn't be one of those places. Because people who go out and drink on a regular basis tend to be smokers more than non smokers. And that is coming from going out to different bars in different areas accross the U.S.Doesn't matter whether smoking is only one way to get sick....it shouldn't be an issue for non smokers. Why is it so hard for a smoker to get up and go outside for a minute for his fix?Dipsomania
Links? You keep posting your personal thoughts but you have yet to provide evidence. As for bias....that shows in your posts. You smoke and drink and want to continue to do so without inconvenience to yourself. None of your posts have been unbiased. Attacking me personally won't get you anywhere.
Non smokers do NOT as a rule smoke because they are drinking. That is a fact.:roll:
[Links? You keep posting your personal thoughts but you have yet to provide evidence. As for bias....that shows in your posts. You smoke and drink and want to continue to do so without inconvenience to yourself. None of your posts have been unbiased. Attacking me personally won't get you anywhere.I tell you what, plain and simple, I am speaking from experience going out and socializing, you show me proof because you also have not cited any of your statementsNon smokers do NOT as a rule smoke because they are drinking. That is a fact.:roll:LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][Links? You keep posting your personal thoughts but you have yet to provide evidence. As for bias....that shows in your posts. You smoke and drink and want to continue to do so without inconvenience to yourself. None of your posts have been unbiased. Attacking me personally won't get you anywhere.I tell you what, plain and simple, I am speaking from experience going out and socializing, you show me proof because you also have not cited any of your statements You have obviously seen surveys to the contrary of your opinion.....you mentioned them. So show me ones that disprove what we've both established as fact. Second, casual smoking does not exist yet you said it did. Show proof....Non smokers do NOT as a rule smoke because they are drinking. That is a fact.:roll:Dipsomania
If someone wants to smoke, then I have no objection in letting them do so. However, having to breathe in someone else's smoke inside a building isn't pleasant at all in my opinion. I feel smoking should be disallowed inside. Outside, however, is a different story. For a start, it would be too hard to enforce, given that there's so much of "outside" to go around. Plus it's easier to avoid. I feel that smoking shouldn't be allowed indoors (public places, not private places), but there are too many problems to consider a ban in outside public places.EJ902
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] You have obviously seen surveys to the contrary of your opinion.....you mentioned them. So show me ones that disprove what we've both established as fact. Second, casual smoking does not exist yet you said it did. Show proof....DipsomaniaI have stated I based my statements on personal experience the reason i said that about the surveys is because I have known people that when asked if they smoked they would say no, but then when I went out with them they have smoked when they were drinking. To me that is casual/social smoking. So how about you show me some stuff that states that there is no such thing as casual smokers and that they do not exist.Start with this
LJS9502_basicIs this the statement for your belief there is no such thing as a casual/social smoker? "Fewer than 1 in 20 smokers smoke less frequently than daily. Other indicators of dependence include the time from waking to first cigarette. Among smokers of all ages, 15 per cent light up within five minutes of waking, while almost half of all smokers (46 per cent) smoke within the first half hour of the day"
[QUOTE="EJ902"]If someone wants to smoke, then I have no objection in letting them do so. However, having to breathe in someone else's smoke inside a building isn't pleasant at all in my opinion. I feel smoking should be disallowed inside. Outside, however, is a different story. For a start, it would be too hard to enforce, given that there's so much of "outside" to go around. Plus it's easier to avoid. I feel that smoking shouldn't be allowed indoors (public places, not private places), but there are too many problems to consider a ban in outside public places.lord_mordain
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] DipsomaniaIs this the statement for your belief there is no such thing as a casual/social smoker? "Fewer than 1 in 20 smokers smoke less frequently than daily. Other indicators of dependence include the time from waking to first cigarette. Among smokers of all ages, 15 per cent light up within five minutes of waking, while almost half of all smokers (46 per cent) smoke within the first half hour of the day" Keep reading....
The "chippers" who can smoke up to five cigarettes a day over many years with no evidence of addiction. Of the 700 children surveyed, 95 said they smoked occasionally which was less than once a month. that is what I was describing when I was talking about casual/social smoker, People who normally don't smoke but go out a few times a month and smoke when they drink. But any other time they do not smokeThen
LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Keep reading....DipsomaniaI read both, both just talked mainly about how nicotine is addictive... which I never disputed I don't know....but claiming most people are casual smokers seems to be a dispute from the facts.Now....let's see some links of yours...
 The "chippers" who can smoke up to five cigarettes a day over many years with no evidence of addiction.DipsomaniaI have news for you....if it's a daily habit...it's addiction. :wink:
I don't know....but claiming most people are casual smokers seems to be a dispute from the facts. Now....let's see some links of yours... LJS9502_basicI do believe I said more than once I was speaking of opinion, so why would I need to cite anything:? I agree smoking is addictive and I said a few, not most, although I did say most people that go out to bars smoke, and that was based on observation of experience from when I have gone out. Although in terms of population as a whole yes it is a minority. I am not saying you are wrong, or that I am right, I am just stating opinion from experience
I have news for you....if it's a daily habit...it's addiction. :wink:LJS9502_basicI never said it wasn't, I said people who don't smoke on a normal basis that when going out drinking a few times a month that do smoke
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I don't know....but claiming most people are casual smokers seems to be a dispute from the facts. Now....let's see some links of yours... DipsomaniaI do believe I said more than once I was speaking of opinion, so why would I need to cite anything:? I agree smoking is addictive and I said a few, not most, although I did say most people that go out to bars smoke, and that was based on observation of experience from when I have gone out. Although in terms of population as a whole yes it is a minority. I am not saying you are wrong, or that I am right, I am just stating opinion from experience You could have saved us both time by not arguing..... :|
I love to go to dinner at this one place, great burgers, chili dogs, ECT. But I had one problem, there was a bar attached to the restraunt. And to make things worse, There was no Non-Smoking section. So the smoke wafted to where I was eating. This disturbed me. What disturbed me even more, was the fact that there were many small children in the smoky restraunt. I knew that second-hand smoke can make you very sick, so I talked to the owner, and he saw the problem. Now at that place, smoking is not allowed on the proptery.
So yes, it would cool if they would ban smoking in public places, but if that doesn't happen, talk with the owner of your fav place to eat, or talk with a city reresentive. TAKE ACTION
You could have saved us both time by not arguing..... :|LJS9502_basic
All based on surveys and we both know people do lie, and I know there are a good number of people who do not smoke. But I would still say there are more people who do smoke than who do not. Because casual/social smokers are more apt to say they don't smoke at all when asked for poll/survey reasons. But I have known alot of people that do not smoke that do smoke when they get drinking. I agree people shouldn't smoke in eating establishments, and I wouldn't mind bars not allowing smoking until say 10:00 p.m. because alot of bars serve food, and some have a very good menu and have families come there to eat. It's just my personal opinion, andyes I am a smoker, but also I live in a house with small children so I smoke outside, because they don't have a choice and it is more healtny for them to do so. But also there are about 2 million ways to get cancer, smoking isn't the only wayDipsomaniaI stated in my first post it was just my personal opinion, I wasn't attacking your opinion or anything... although I guess I did start out a little like I was... for that i apologize
i think i somehow dodged those bullets. he abandoned his line of argument with me and focused on whats his face over there. ROLFCHANKNext time it's your turn to take the massacre:P
[QUOTE="ROLFCHANK"] i think i somehow dodged those bullets. he abandoned his line of argument with me and focused on whats his face over there. DipsomaniaNext time it's your turn to take the massacre:P i dont want to start things up again, but i think i bested him when we were actually arguing. he likened anti smoking laws to governments' ability to regulate business via health code laws, as though it is the same thing when one walks into a smoky bar and sits there and when he eats contaminated, undercooked food. either way, this argument is not really worth having because it comes down to whether you think the government should be meddling in private business in the name of public benefit. i dont, many people do. wonderful, lets move on.
[QUOTE="Dipsomania"][QUOTE="ROLFCHANK"] i think i somehow dodged those bullets. he abandoned his line of argument with me and focused on whats his face over there. ROLFCHANKNext time it's your turn to take the massacre:P i dont want to start things up again, but i think i bested him when we were actually arguing. he likened anti smoking laws to governments' ability to regulate business via health code laws, as though it is the same thing when one walks into a smoky bar and sits there and when he eats contaminated, undercooked food. either way, this argument is not really worth having because it comes down to whether you think the government should be meddling in private business in the name of public benefit. i dont, many people do. wonderful, lets move on. No...I "bested" you. Your argument was against government interference in business...and I pointed out the necessity of it. Therefore, I...um...won that round. :wink:
[QUOTE="Dipsomania"][QUOTE="ROLFCHANK"] i think i somehow dodged those bullets. he abandoned his line of argument with me and focused on whats his face over there. ROLFCHANKNext time it's your turn to take the massacre:P i dont want to start things up again, but i think i bested him when we were actually arguing. he likened anti smoking laws to governments' ability to regulate business via health code laws, as though it is the same thing when one walks into a smoky bar and sits there and when he eats contaminated, undercooked food. either way, this argument is not really worth having because it comes down to whether you think the government should be meddling in private business in the name of public benefit. i dont, many people do. wonderful, lets move on. I personally don't think you can win the argument with your viewpoint. Smoking is disgusting and I don't see why anyone should have to avoid a place because of smokers. Smokers choose to smoke, and no restrictions should be considered unfair.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment