Do you believe in the Darwin Theory?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#301 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Fandangle"]

I think Darwin's theory is a lot easier to belief than the Adam/Eve theory.

Darwin FTW

hamstergeddon

false dichotomy

That is his subjective opinion, not a false dichotomy -- a false dichotomy would be compelling you to make a choice between the two, saying that they are mutually exclusive beyond a doubt.
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="JCblueside"]The Theory of Evolution is now a FACT people, so it should be called the "Fact of Evolution".hamstergeddon
No, a fact is an observed phenomenon. The theoy of evolution is the explanation of many phenomena; you do not take courses such as "cell fact", "atomic fact", "color fact", or "nuclear fact."


FACT: Evolution is happening right now with diseases such as Turburculosis, making new strains of TB that are immune to everything we throw at it.

You did not understand me: if evolution occurs right now, that is a fact, but what is the explanation of evolution called? ;)


:question: I don't understand what you're getting at. Evolution is the explanation for how we came to be.

organisms changing over time is a fact. but how they change, which is natural selection, is a theory.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#302 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
:question: I don't understand what you're getting at. Evolution is the explanation for how we came to be. hamstergeddon
Evolution by natural selection is the process -- the theory of evolution is the explanation of this process.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#303 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
That's kinda splitting hairs on semantics.
Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#304 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

C_Town_Soul

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#305 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.
Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#306 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

quiglythegreat

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#307 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

Silly Revinh they're gonna evolve and learn it all slowly. :roll:

(Sarcasm)

Avatar image for Why_Me-
Why_Me-

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#308 Why_Me-
Member since 2007 • 131 Posts

I was going to write a lot more, but I could sum it up in one word.

Doh.

Avatar image for xSIZEMATTER
xSIZEMATTER

7045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#309 xSIZEMATTER
Member since 2008 • 7045 Posts

i believe in God. darwin theory not a word of itNSR34GTR

same

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#310 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

123625

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

Silly Revinh they're gonna evolve and learn it all slowly. :roll:

Right, is that why we're so far ahead and none of them are currently on their way of doing that? :roll:

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#311 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts

[QUOTE="NSR34GTR"]i believe in God. darwin theory not a word of itxSIZEMATTER

same

why dont you believe in natural selection? care to talk about it?

in the age of the internet, I fail to understand how anyone can deny evolution if they have taken any interest in it.

Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#312 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

how would them not being able to do those things prove that they haven't evolved?
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#313 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

123625

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

Silly Revinh they're gonna evolve and learn it all slowly. :roll:

(Sarcasm)

revinh, all those things which you listed are by-products of higher brain function. they in no way disprove evolution
Avatar image for JCblueside
JCblueside

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#314 JCblueside
Member since 2005 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="JCblueside"]The Theory of Evolution is now a FACT people, so it should be called the "Fact of Evolution".CptJSparrow
No, a fact is an observed phenomenon. The theoy of evolution is the explanation of many phenomena; you do not take courses such as "cell fact", "atomic fact", "color fact", or "nuclear fact."

Then from your explanation, evolution is an observed phenomenon since biological evolution never stopped and it continue on to all life forms as time passes by.

Avatar image for JCblueside
JCblueside

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#315 JCblueside
Member since 2005 • 14529 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

You don't really know the fundamentals of evolution do you? Our ancestral primates migrated to different parts of the world when the map and land mass was still different from what we know of in our time and changed as time goes on. Our ancestors underwent the mechanism & processes of evolution depending on which environment they lived. Adaptation, genetic drift, gene flow, mutation, natural selecton, & speciation are among these processes. This is the work of biological's way of living efficiently and therefore survive ideally on a particular environment.

Its like a tree of evolution. As our ancestors migrateed through different places, the species is branched like branches of tree. Each of them evolved upon the environment they lived on and hence adaptation & changes occured. Some grew thick hairs in cold climates, others grew tall, dwarfed, developed advance inteligence, & etc. Most were unfortunate and became endangered and finally ending their branch of the species in extinction. Some of the fittest for survival lives on and not only we are one of those but we are clearly the fittest of the branch in our current existence.

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#316 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts

[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

yoshi-lnex

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

how would them not being able to do those things prove that they haven't evolved?

revinh, all those things which you listed are by-products of higher brain function. they in no way disprove evolutionnotconspiracy

I was talking about how humans are human different. Follow the conversation please.

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#317 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

JCblueside

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

You don't really know the fundamentals of evolution do you? Our ancestral primates migrated to different parts of the world when the map and land mass was still different from what we know of in our time and changed as time goes on. Our ancestors underwent the mechanism & processes of evolution depending on which environment they lived. Adaptation, genetic drift, gene flow, mutation, natural selecton, & speciation are among these processes. This is the work of biological's way of living efficiently and therefore survive ideally on a particular environment.

Its like a tree of evolution. As our ancestors migrateed through different places, the species is branched like branches of tree. Each of them evolved upon the environment they lived on and hence adaptation & changes occured. Some grew thick hairs in cold climates, others grew tall, dwarfed, developed advance inteligence, & etc. Most were unfortunate and became endangered and finally ending their branch of the species in extinction. Some of the fittest for survival lives on and not only we are one of those but we are clearly the fittest of the branch in our current existence.

No amount of evolution speculation can satisfactorily explain the human miracle. It's far more reasonable to think that creation accounts for it.

No amount of mutation can turn a living thing into something else.

The fossil record agrees with creation showing sudden appearances of creatures virtually unchanged over long periods of time. Are there in fact intermediate forms or are they just desperate attempts to make the data fit with the theory? You'll probably say there are, but I encourage you to investigate if that's really the case.

Avatar image for premier111
premier111

986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#318 premier111
Member since 2007 • 986 Posts
yep, we definetly changed for the better
Avatar image for Nude_Dude
Nude_Dude

5530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#319 Nude_Dude
Member since 2007 • 5530 Posts

yep, we definetly changed for the betterpremier111

or for worse...and damn this thread is still up? >_>

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#320 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

Yes, and :lol: at the people who denies it.

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#322 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="JCblueside"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

You don't really know the fundamentals of evolution do you? Our ancestral primates migrated to different parts of the world when the map and land mass was still different from what we know of in our time and changed as time goes on. Our ancestors underwent the mechanism & processes of evolution depending on which environment they lived. Adaptation, genetic drift, gene flow, mutation, natural selecton, & speciation are among these processes. This is the work of biological's way of living efficiently and therefore survive ideally on a particular environment.

Its like a tree of evolution. As our ancestors migrateed through different places, the species is branched like branches of tree. Each of them evolved upon the environment they lived on and hence adaptation & changes occured. Some grew thick hairs in cold climates, others grew tall, dwarfed, developed advance inteligence, & etc. Most were unfortunate and became endangered and finally ending their branch of the species in extinction. Some of the fittest for survival lives on and not only we are one of those but we are clearly the fittest of the branch in our current existence.

No amount of evolution speculation can satisfactorily explain the human miracle. It's far more reasonable to think that creation accounts for it.

No amount of mutation can turn a living thing into something else.

The fossil record agrees with creation showing sudden appearances of creatures virtually unchanged over long periods of time. Are there in fact intermediate forms or are they just desperate attempts to make the data fit with the theory? You'll probably say there are, but I encourage you to investigate if that's really the case.

the "human miracle" is nothing more than the result of higher brain function.

second, at what point will "something" be "something else"?

and no, the fossil record does NOT agree with creation. there are numerous intermediate fossils out there. we have transtitionals from reptiles to mammals, reptiles to birds, apes to humans, land mammals to cetaceans, fish to amphibians, and amphibians to reptiles

Avatar image for C_Town_Soul
C_Town_Soul

9489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#323 C_Town_Soul
Member since 2003 • 9489 Posts
[QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Still don't understand. A frog will always birth frogs; humans always birth humans. We agree on that. Still evolution happens. With each generation of an organism, there's always variation; no matter what. What might begin as a frog, may give birth to another with a favorable trait that gives it a better chance at survival and passing on that trait. More variation occurs after thousands of generations, and you would hypothetically have something different than the original. It probably won't be able to, or with diffuclty, reproduce with the original; akin to a lion and tiger or a horse and zebra.

That doesn't imply that there is a creator.

And humans are apes

Avatar image for luke1889
luke1889

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#324 luke1889
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts

Yes I believe Darwins theory, the only people who don't are those devout zealots brainwashed by religion.Spartan_385

I completely agree.

Avatar image for mohfrontline
mohfrontline

5678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#325 mohfrontline
Member since 2007 • 5678 Posts
there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.
Avatar image for deepdreamer256
deepdreamer256

7140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#326 deepdreamer256
Member since 2005 • 7140 Posts
there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.mohfrontline
How exactly does it make more sense? And I'm sorry, but there isn't any evidence whatsoever for the creation theory.
Avatar image for Zagrius
Zagrius

3820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#327 Zagrius
Member since 2002 • 3820 Posts

there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.mohfrontline

And I suppose you can provide this super-special-awesome evidence for Creation which has eluded scientists for so long?

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#328 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.mohfrontline

This is like Darwin Week meets Opposite Day. Did you have a dyslexic moment, or are you seriously saying that Creationism has more evidence than Evolution? Over 200,000 researched articles vs. the Bible.

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#329 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.mohfrontline
I guess the other theory would be "Creationism/ID"? If that's the case how can there be zero evidence for either Darwin Theory OR Creationism/ID but more evidence for Creationism/ID? That just makes zero sense. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that Creationism makes more sense than your post, that's how far out it is.
Avatar image for deepdreamer256
deepdreamer256

7140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#330 deepdreamer256
Member since 2005 • 7140 Posts

[QUOTE="mohfrontline"]there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.dsmccracken

This is like Darwin Week meets Opposite Day. Did you have a dyslexic moment, or are you seriously saying that Creationism has more evidence than Evolution? Over 200,000 researched articles vs. the Bible.

Which was probably written by a bunch of political quacks.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#331 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]

[QUOTE="mohfrontline"]there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.deepdreamer256

This is like Darwin Week meets Opposite Day. Did you have a dyslexic moment, or are you seriously saying that Creationism has more evidence than Evolution? Over 200,000 researched articles vs. the Bible.

Which was probably written by a bunch of political quacks.

Political quacks... is that what we're calling scientists with years of education, training and research now? As opposed to, what? Pat Robertson, with his Bachelor of Arts? Why go to school to learn about the world when, darn it, the truth was in your heart the whole time!

Avatar image for deepdreamer256
deepdreamer256

7140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#332 deepdreamer256
Member since 2005 • 7140 Posts
[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="dsmccracken"]

[QUOTE="mohfrontline"]there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.dsmccracken

This is like Darwin Week meets Opposite Day. Did you have a dyslexic moment, or are you seriously saying that Creationism has more evidence than Evolution? Over 200,000 researched articles vs. the Bible.

Which was probably written by a bunch of political quacks.

Political quacks... is that what we're calling scientists with years of education, training and research now? As opposed to, what? Pat Robertson, with his Bachelor of Arts? Why go to school to learn about the world when, darn it, the truth was in your heart the whole time!

I meant the bible dooder. You have a point though.
Avatar image for casparmorch
casparmorch

744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#333 casparmorch
Member since 2004 • 744 Posts

I can't believe that people actually believes in God and says evolution is stupid.

Just look at cows. Farmers mate them to get the right genes in the right cows and hence enhancing them to be better. Isn't that pretty much a proof that evolution is possible?

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#334 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.mohfrontline
I really hope you are prepared to back up that statement

I can't believe that people actually believes in God and says evolution is stupid.

Just look at cows. Farmers mate them to get the right genes in the right cows and hence enhancing them to be better. Isn't that pretty much a proof that evolution is possible?

casparmorch
why is theism so stupid?
Avatar image for deepdreamer256
deepdreamer256

7140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#335 deepdreamer256
Member since 2005 • 7140 Posts
[QUOTE="mohfrontline"]there's no proof for either theory. Although there's more evidence for the creation theory. Plus it makes more sense.notconspiracy
I really hope you are prepared to back up that statement

I can't believe that people actually believes in God and says evolution is stupid.

Just look at cows. Farmers mate them to get the right genes in the right cows and hence enhancing them to be better. Isn't that pretty much a proof that evolution is possible?

casparmorch
why is theism so stupid?

He didn't say theism is stupid. He said disbelief in evolution is stupid. Flame him for that instead . . .
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#336 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

That's all a product of humans' superior spatial logic which I have already explained. You insist that we at no point could ever have been like apes in any way, though you have provided no reasons why, stating again and again that you are different from an ape, almost as if you were insecure about it. Ok, we are, not terribly, and the ways we are different derive from evolution. I have already explained how this change commenced and again I remind you that humans' advantage over all other animals is the ability to think abstractly.
Avatar image for jodamn
jodamn

893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#337 jodamn
Member since 2007 • 893 Posts
Anyone else see the irony in creationists demanding proof? :D
Avatar image for JCblueside
JCblueside

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#338 JCblueside
Member since 2005 • 14529 Posts

To end this thread and the ignorance of all the doubters towards Evolution, have you all heard the thing called Deoxyribonucleic acid or DNA, you know the building blocks of life? That basically is the ultimate genetic piece that proves Evolution is real and is happening. Anyone who still doesnt believe in Evolution is probably either uncivilized, too young to understand, or trying to ignore this facts due to his Religious beliefs.

Avatar image for Helloiseeu
Helloiseeu

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#339 Helloiseeu
Member since 2007 • 786 Posts
Darwin.
Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#340 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

C_Town_Soul

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Still don't understand. A frog will always birth frogs; humans always birth humans. We agree on that. Still evolution happens. With each generation of an organism, there's always variation; no matter what. What might begin as a frog, may give birth to another with a favorable trait that gives it a better chance at survival and passing on that trait. More variation occurs after thousands of generations, and you would hypothetically have something different than the original. It probably won't be able to, or with diffuclty, reproduce with the original; akin to a lion and tiger or a horse and zebra.

That doesn't imply that there is a creator.

And humans are apes

Still don't understand. You're taking variation and extending it which isn't really plausible.

If humans have always been humans and were never anything else then they must have been created to begin with.

And I already explained the human difference.

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#341 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

quiglythegreat

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

That's all a product of humans' superior spatial logic which I have already explained. You insist that we at no point could ever have been like apes in any way, though you have provided no reasons why, stating again and again that you are different from an ape, almost as if you were insecure about it. Ok, we are, not terribly, and the ways we are different derive from evolution. I have already explained how this change commenced and again I remind you that humans' advantage over all other animals is the ability to think abstractly.

Again, I was saying that this whole human difference - intellectual and spiritual superiority, etc - is an embarassment to evolution. Why do humans have an amazing brain, and like you said abstract thinking, and significantly more potential than any animal? How did it go from a "dumb" ape to a human with incredible mind? To simply say that they 'evolved' because of "their environment" or whatever is sorely inadequate. I don't know about you but I find that very difficult to believe.

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#342 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="xSIZEMATTER"]

[QUOTE="NSR34GTR"]i believe in God. darwin theory not a word of itnotconspiracy

same

why dont you believe in natural selection? care to talk about it?

in the age of the internet, I fail to understand how anyone can deny evolution if they have taken any interest in it.

'cause they're not gullible enough

Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#343 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Still don't understand. A frog will always birth frogs; humans always birth humans. We agree on that. Still evolution happens. With each generation of an organism, there's always variation; no matter what. What might begin as a frog, may give birth to another with a favorable trait that gives it a better chance at survival and passing on that trait. More variation occurs after thousands of generations, and you would hypothetically have something different than the original. It probably won't be able to, or with diffuclty, reproduce with the original; akin to a lion and tiger or a horse and zebra.

That doesn't imply that there is a creator.

And humans are apes

Still don't understand. You're taking variation and extending it which isn't really plausible.

If humans have always been humans and were never anything else then they must have been created to begin with.

And I already explained the human difference.

Actually we are technically considered "great apes", and we will always be apes, though we will continue to evolve.I dont see whats your beef with evolution, its backed by evidence and study, its been proven, and tested, if for some reason its false, which is unlikely but possible then we continue to research and study alternatives.

Really, what are your motives?Why are you so desperate to disprove evolution?

Avatar image for domatron23
domatron23

6226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#344 domatron23
Member since 2007 • 6226 Posts
Is anyone else here suffering from intense deja vu?
Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#345 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="xSIZEMATTER"]

[QUOTE="NSR34GTR"]i believe in God. darwin theory not a word of itRevinh

same

why dont you believe in natural selection? care to talk about it?

in the age of the internet, I fail to understand how anyone can deny evolution if they have taken any interest in it.

'cause they're not gullible enough

Surprisingly enough though, said individual is gullible enough to fall for creationism.

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#346 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

xxDustmanxx

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Still don't understand. A frog will always birth frogs; humans always birth humans. We agree on that. Still evolution happens. With each generation of an organism, there's always variation; no matter what. What might begin as a frog, may give birth to another with a favorable trait that gives it a better chance at survival and passing on that trait. More variation occurs after thousands of generations, and you would hypothetically have something different than the original. It probably won't be able to, or with diffuclty, reproduce with the original; akin to a lion and tiger or a horse and zebra.

That doesn't imply that there is a creator.

And humans are apes

Still don't understand. You're taking variation and extending it which isn't really plausible.

If humans have always been humans and were never anything else then they must have been created to begin with.

And I already explained the human difference.

Actually we are technically considered "great apes", and we will always be apes, though we will continue to evolve.I dont see whats your beef with evolution, its backed by evidence and study, its been proven, and tested, if for some reason its false, which is unlikely but possible then we continue to research and study alternatives.

Really, what are your motives?Why are you so desperate to disprove evolution?

Call it whatever you want it doesn't change the fact that we are different.

It's been proven and tested? lol and then it could still be false? you make sense

How am I so desperate? I've just been posting my thoughts that all. I might just seem that way because a whole bunch of apes, or I mean, people are the opposing belief as mine and I'm having to tackle them all.

Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#347 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

That's all a product of humans' superior spatial logic which I have already explained. You insist that we at no point could ever have been like apes in any way, though you have provided no reasons why, stating again and again that you are different from an ape, almost as if you were insecure about it. Ok, we are, not terribly, and the ways we are different derive from evolution. I have already explained how this change commenced and again I remind you that humans' advantage over all other animals is the ability to think abstractly.

Again, I was saying that this whole human difference - intellectual and spiritual superiority, etc - is an embarassment to evolution. Why do humans have an amazing brain, and like you said abstract thinking, and significantly more potential than any animal? How did it go from a "dumb" ape to a human with incredible mind? To simply say that they 'evolved' because of "their environment" or whatever is sorely inadequate. I don't know about you but I find that very difficult to believe.

First of all, the human spirit has not been proven to exist.

Humans have an amazing brain because it has evolved...its been explained to you many times, now your just plugging your ears.

All animals have the potential to evolve to our level, we simply were set up in certain circumstances to evolve beyond our ape ancestors.

Apes arent dump, for example homo sapien.

I find it difficult to believe that with the overwhelming amount of evidence you wont give up.

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#348 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="xSIZEMATTER"]

[QUOTE="NSR34GTR"]i believe in God. darwin theory not a word of itxxDustmanxx

same

why dont you believe in natural selection? care to talk about it?

in the age of the internet, I fail to understand how anyone can deny evolution if they have taken any interest in it.

'cause they're not gullible enough

Surprisingly enough though, said individual is gullible enough to fall for creationism.

Whatever you say, great ape

Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#349 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="xxDustmanxx"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

Revinh

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Still don't understand. A frog will always birth frogs; humans always birth humans. We agree on that. Still evolution happens. With each generation of an organism, there's always variation; no matter what. What might begin as a frog, may give birth to another with a favorable trait that gives it a better chance at survival and passing on that trait. More variation occurs after thousands of generations, and you would hypothetically have something different than the original. It probably won't be able to, or with diffuclty, reproduce with the original; akin to a lion and tiger or a horse and zebra.

That doesn't imply that there is a creator.

And humans are apes

Still don't understand. You're taking variation and extending it which isn't really plausible.

If humans have always been humans and were never anything else then they must have been created to begin with.

And I already explained the human difference.

Actually we are technically considered "great apes", and we will always be apes, though we will continue to evolve.I dont see whats your beef with evolution, its backed by evidence and study, its been proven, and tested, if for some reason its false, which is unlikely but possible then we continue to research and study alternatives.

Really, what are your motives?Why are you so desperate to disprove evolution?

Call it whatever you want it doesn't change the fact that we are different.

It's been proven and tested? lol and then it could still be false? you make sense

How am I so desperate? I've just been posting my thoughts that all. I might just seem that way because a whole bunch of apes, or I mean, people are the opposing belief as mine and I'm having to tackle them all.

We arent so different from alot of our cousins, youd be surprised if you bothered to look into it.

It could be false,(although highly unlikely.)because science constantly tests its own theories.

Every night im on here, youre on some thread duking it out with someone, over how evolution is so false, and you cant believe that our species evolved over time, wow it sounds so ridiculous.

Avatar image for Revinh
Revinh

1957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#350 Revinh
Member since 2005 • 1957 Posts
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="C_Town_Soul"][QUOTE="Revinh"]

No, a frog won't do that, at least not in millions of years :lol: My point is that's basically what evolutionist believe, that creatures can go shapeshifting given enough time. I know enough to know the theory is false. If you want to believe in a fairy tale that's up to you.

xxDustmanxx

No that response still implies a frog will give birth to a non frog, but now with longer time. That's not what evolution says. A frog has always birthed frogs, and they will always birth frogs.

Exactly! which means humans have always been humans and they will always be humans, and therefore they must have been created to begin with.

Wake up from evodelusion people! We're clearly different from apes!

Well, yes, but not really so much. We have eyes and hands and ears and fairly good brains and hopes and desires and such. We're really not so different from other living beings.

Really? Can the apes sing and dance, make artistic creations, and build houses? Do they have a seemingly endless learning capacity and the ability to accumulate knowledge? Do they farm and cultivate the ground? Do they study other plants and animals? Do they have complex, spoken language like us? Do they have technological facility? Do they have dominion over nature? Do they wear clothes? I didn't think so.

That's all a product of humans' superior spatial logic which I have already explained. You insist that we at no point could ever have been like apes in any way, though you have provided no reasons why, stating again and again that you are different from an ape, almost as if you were insecure about it. Ok, we are, not terribly, and the ways we are different derive from evolution. I have already explained how this change commenced and again I remind you that humans' advantage over all other animals is the ability to think abstractly.

Again, I was saying that this whole human difference - intellectual and spiritual superiority, etc - is an embarassment to evolution. Why do humans have an amazing brain, and like you said abstract thinking, and significantly more potential than any animal? How did it go from a "dumb" ape to a human with incredible mind? To simply say that they 'evolved' because of "their environment" or whatever is sorely inadequate. I don't know about you but I find that very difficult to believe.

First of all, the human spirit has not been proven to exist.

Humans have an amazing brain because it has evolved...its been explained to you many times, now your just plugging your ears.

All animals have the potential to evolve to our level, we simply were set up in certain circumstances to evolve beyond our ape ancestors.

Apes arent dump, for example homo sapien.

I find it difficult to believe that with the overwhelming amount of evidence you wont give up.

First of all, I wasn't talking about "the human spirit" but moral values.

Like I said, if you find that easy to believe that's your problem.

Two words: vague and speculation.

When I say apes, I'm obviously excluding humans if you categorize them as also apes.

Because they'll all weak even if you combine the "overwhelming amount" of them.