Do you belive 9/11 was a inside job?

i highly doubt any country would kill thousands of its own people and destroy an economical headquarters, causing it to go into a recession just for a reason to go occupy another nation.

i highly doubt any country would kill thousands of its own people and destroy an economical headquarters, causing it to go into a recession just for a reason to go occupy another nation.

dissonantblack

... Its not even that.. It would be impossible for them to keep it under wraps.. And people seem not to understand that a controled devestation takes months of planning, and ripping up the interior to place the explosives.. Its laughable.

[QUOTE="dissonantblack"]

i highly doubt any country would kill thousands of its own people and destroy an economical headquarters, causing it to go into a recession just for a reason to go occupy another nation.

sSubZerOo

... Its not even that.. It would be impossible for them to keep it under wraps.. And people seem not to understand that a controled devestation takes months of planning, and ripping up the interior to place the explosives.. Its laughable.

It's more probably that the explosives were always there as a safeguard to make sure that if it does collapse, it wouldn't topple other buildings around it. They just didn't want people knowing they had that in the building, as it'd probably be really bad for business.

Mwhaha yeah. Yes I do.

Its right here in these secret documents

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="dissonantblack"]

i highly doubt any country would kill thousands of its own people and destroy an economical headquarters, causing it to go into a recession just for a reason to go occupy another nation.

xionvalkyrie

... Its not even that.. It would be impossible for them to keep it under wraps.. And people seem not to understand that a controled devestation takes months of planning, and ripping up the interior to place the explosives.. Its laughable.

It's more probably that the explosives were always there as a safeguard to make sure that if it does collapse, it wouldn't topple other buildings around it. They just didn't want people knowing they had that in the building, as it'd probably be really bad for business.

here is my answer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SX3JnUhTaE

i'm going to go with the south park explaination

[QUOTE="Omni-Slash"]Yes....all orchestrated by the mole people.....ThePlothole

Wouldn't that be an "underground job" then?

inside the earth....duhhhhhh...:roll:....Omni-Slash

The Earth is conspiring against us? I know we've trashed her up a bit, but that just seems rather extreme!

I saw a 911 documentary (I think this is it: http://www.amazon.com/911-Plane-Site-Directors-Cut/dp/B00116VG46/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1268784322&sr=8-3) and even though I don't know if 911 was a cover up something is very odd. I am all for the US heck I'm a United States Marine but something really wrong happened on 911 and I don't believe a lot of the stuff that happened.

I saw a 911 documentary (I think this is it: http://www.amazon.com/911-Plane-Site-Directors-Cut/dp/B00116VG46/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1268784322&sr=8-3) and even though I don't know if 911 was a cover up something is very odd. I am all for the US heck I'm a United States Marine but something really wrong happened on 911 and I don't believe a lot of the stuff that happened.

Mighty-Lu-Bu

zzeitgeist made me think a lil

No and I think you should move forward instead of obsessing about it, Muslim extremists don't like you deal with it.

zzeitgeist made me think a lil

IRunNewYork

zzeitgeist made me think a lil

IRunNewYork

Yeah but I have seen other stuff too besides the film. In history numerous other buildings have burned for hours even days and they never collapsed and the towers collapsed after just like what 45 min or something and they are the only buildings in history to ever do that. Kinda sketchy. And fire fighters and cops said they saw flashes inside the building when it was going down and I'm not a demo expert but I do know enough that the towers came down in a controlled manner, very similar to the demo of a building. There is a lot of shadiness surrounding 911. And with the whole Pentagon how the plane clipped the tops off some light poles and like a few days earlier air force one did something similar but it ripped the light poles out, it didn't clip the tops off. They didn't find the right plane parts in any of the crash sites either. And I forget his name but the owner of the towers like 2 weeks before 911 got an insane insurance claim for the buildings specially in case of disaster and terrorist attacks. This is all sketchy, I'm a Marine and I am saying this is sketchy and it just doesn't rub me the right way.

Yeah but I have seen other stuff too besides the film. In history numerous other buildings have burned for hours even days and they never collapsed and the towers collapsed after just like what 45 min or something and they are the only buildings in history to ever do that. Kinda sketchy. And fire fighters and cops said they saw flashes inside the building when it was going down and I'm not a demo expert but I do know enough that the towers came down in a controlled manner, very similar to the demo of a building. There is a lot of shadiness surrounding 911. And with the whole Pentagon how the plane clipped the tops off some light poles and like a few days earlier air force one did something similar but it ripped the light poles out, it didn't clip the tops off. They didn't find the right plane parts in any of the crash sites either. And I forget his name but the owner of the towers like 2 weeks before 911 got an insane insurance claim for the buildings specially in case of disaster and terrorist attacks. This is all sketchy, I'm a Marine and I am saying this is sketchy and it just doesn't rub me the wrong way.

Mighty-Lu-Bu

1. The towers did not fall in a way even remotely resembling a controlled demolition.

2. The light poles did not just have the tops clipped off. The poles came off all the way. As a matter of fact, they're designed to do just that.

3. The towers were not simply on fire, but they'd sustained a great deal of damage from planes crashing into them

4. Kader Toy Factory. Collapsed due to fire and nothing else.

5. Considering that the towers had been attacked by terrorists before, I don't think that having an insurance claim is particularly "insane." Also, considering the obvious loss in tenancy due to there not being a building, as well as the cost of rebuilding, I think that'd qualify as the worst insure scam ever.

[QUOTE="ThePlothole"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"]Are they still sticking with the story that they found the passports of the pilots in the debris of the towers? Cause if they are, I'm still on the fence.guitarshr3dd3r

The only passport even claimed to have been on one of the planes that flew into the towers was said to have fallen to the street and collected prior to the collapse. Two more were recovered from flight flight 93, which is the one that went down in the Pennsylvania field. The final passport was found in a piece of luggage that wasn't on board any of the planes.

This is the worst conspiracy theory ever. wstfld

[QUOTE="wstfld"]This is the worst conspiracy theory ever. fenwickhotmail

You know what's kind of funny? People always liken George Bush to a chimp. He's portrayed as an enormous moron. Yet, these same people believe that he was capable of pulling of the most brilliant conspiracy of all time. Yes, that makes sense. Bush is this incredible criminal mastermind that has us all fooled.. . . .

[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"][QUOTE="wstfld"]This is the worst conspiracy theory ever. PannicAtack

:lol: No. :lol:Theokhoth

[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"][QUOTE="wstfld"]This is the worst conspiracy theory ever. PannicAtack

I'm going with HAARP causing the Haitian Earthquake. I still can't believe that anyone swallows that. It's completely ridiculous.mattbbpl

Anytime a theory involves the phrase "earthquake machine", you know that it's time to step back a bit and reflect.

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]I'm going with HAARP causing the Haitian Earthquake. I still can't believe that anyone swallows that. It's completely ridiculous.GabuEx

Anytime a theory involves the phrase "earthquake machine", you know that it's time to step back a bit and reflect.

absolutely NOT.

What is the rationale behind bombing yourself?

So in other words the TC is just an idiot. Am I right?

I honestly don't know.

My gut tells me, NO. because keeping such a massive job a total secret would be almost impossible.

The ONLY thing that bugs me is the way in which the towers fell. It looked exactly like a building being professionally demolished. Of course, it could have just fallen this way...

I dont know. Neither option would surprise me.

akuma_od3

it just fell that way, structural analysis theory explains it very well, basically columns are only designed to take 1 floor otherwise they defelect and bend to much, that combined with a fire that heated the structure which was made of steel caused the columns to fail roughly at the same timeand collapse so evenly

No and I think you should move forward instead of obsessing about it, Muslim extremists don't like you deal with it.

SapSacPrime

In terms of structural analysis of the failure of the buildings and all the investigations involved with it, the US government acted very suspiciously and secretly with respect to releasing information and being transparent, so that makes me very suspicious. They could easily instantly disprove all the conspiracies if they wanted to (and if there really wasn't anything to hide)...F1_2004

Huh? Experts in relevant fields have published in-depth analyses of what happened on 9/11, all of which corroborate the official explanation and discount the theories put forth by conspiracy theorists, the most prominent of which being the well-known article in Popular Mechanics. What additional proof is needed?

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]In terms of structural analysis of the failure of the buildings and all the investigations involved with it, the US government acted very suspiciously and secretly with respect to releasing information and being transparent, so that makes me very suspicious. They could easily instantly disprove all the conspiracies if they wanted to (and if there really wasn't anything to hide)...GabuEx

Huh? Experts in relevant fields have published in-depth analyses of what happened on 9/11, all of which corroborate the official explanation and discount the theories put forth by conspiracy theorists, the most prominent of which being the well-known article in Popular Mechanics. What additional proof is needed?

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]In terms of structural analysis of the failure of the buildings and all the investigations involved with it, the US government acted very suspiciously and secretly with respect to releasing information and being transparent, so that makes me very suspicious. They could easily instantly disprove all the conspiracies if they wanted to (and if there really wasn't anything to hide)...F1_2004

Huh? Experts in relevant fields have published in-depth analyses of what happened on 9/11, all of which corroborate the official explanation and discount the theories put forth by conspiracy theorists, the most prominent of which being the well-known article in Popular Mechanics. What additional proof is needed?

I asked a simple question: what additional proof is needed?

There's a lot of things that don't add up. You want me to type out a 100-page report on it right now or what? It's all on the internet in journals if you're willing to look. Or maybe I can just link to an article on it in Cosmo magazine, bout as convincing as an article on Popular Mechanics.

There's a lot of things that don't add up. You want me to type out a 100-page report on it right now or what? It's all on the internet in journals if you're willing to look. Or maybe I can just link to an article on it in Cosmo magazine, bout as convincing as an article on Popular Mechanics.

F1_2004

So... what additional proof is needed?

I voted maybe.

We had a thread like this a few months back. Turned into a screaming match with anti-conspiracy types saying anyone who even fancies the possibility of it being an inside job should be shot.