What say you?
I'm indifferent since we can't know for sure.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Might as well be since it's so biggly.KiIIyouDespite what I said, I think I might agree with you there.
[QUOTE="Diophage"]Nothingness doesn't exist!Because existence is not a term that can ever apply to it.Nothingness is infinite, but I don't think anything else is.
ZumaJones07
No, there's a border out there somewhere. Eventually, it will collapse back in on itself, and the cycle begins anew.JustPlainLucas
Actually, the guys that won this year's Nobel prize in physics figured out that the universe's expansion is actually accelerating, which suggests at some point everything in the universe will be so far apart all energy will dissipate and the universe will freeze and "die". And that'll be the end of it.
At least that's what I heard. :P
Infinite or Finite it doesn't really matter all we know is the univerese is increadibly vast and we don't even understand 0.000001% of it.
[QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"]No, there's a border out there somewhere. Eventually, it will collapse back in on itself, and the cycle begins anew.black_cat19
Actually, the guys that won this year's Nobel prize in physics figured out that the universe's expansion is actually accelerating, which suggests at some point everything in the universe will be so far apart all energy will dissipate and the universe will freeze and "die". And that'll be the end of it.
At least that's what I heard. :P
So no heat death?[QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"]No, there's a border out there somewhere. Eventually, it will collapse back in on itself, and the cycle begins anew.black_cat19
Actually, the guys that won this year's Nobel prize in physics figured out that the universe's expansion is actually accelerating, which suggests at some point everything in the universe will be so far apart all energy will dissipate and the universe will freeze and "die". And that'll be the end of it.
At least that's what I heard. :P
I hope I'm dead before that happens. :o[QUOTE="black_cat19"][QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"]No, there's a border out there somewhere. Eventually, it will collapse back in on itself, and the cycle begins anew.gamerguru100
Actually, the guys that won this year's Nobel prize in physics figured out that the universe's expansion is actually accelerating, which suggests at some point everything in the universe will be so far apart all energy will dissipate and the universe will freeze and "die". And that'll be the end of it.
At least that's what I heard. :P
I hope I'm dead before that happens. :oOh don't worry, I've got it on good authority you will be. ;)
[QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"]No, there's a border out there somewhere. Eventually, it will collapse back in on itself, and the cycle begins anew.black_cat19
Actually, the guys that won this year's Nobel prize in physics figured out that the universe's expansion is actually accelerating, which suggests at some point everything in the universe will be so far apart all energy will dissipate and the universe will freeze and "die". And that'll be the end of it.
At least that's what I heard. :P
Well isn't that just brilliantI really don't think there's enough evidence to say one way or another. But, the big bang theory has explained and even predicted many phenomena we see in the universe, for example, the cosmic background radiation. And if this reality did begin in a bang or sorts, than I'd think that would imply a starting point of expansion... and from that, a cosmic horizon. And this is actually what we kinda see when we pear back in time to over 13 billion years ago, we see what the beginnings of our universe looked like... and nothing after that. Now this doesn't imply a horizon must exist, just that the light from anything beyond what we see now hasn't reached us yet.
But whatever, my answer would not be indifferent, but... I don't know, ask me again when the information comes in.
[QUOTE="Diophage"]wow deep. Really that's an interesting point. It is interesting, and I have considered that also. We tend to think of the universe's infinity as infinite planets and stars and all that siht. But what if that ends and It's just eternal nothing. That seems very logical actually.Nothingness is infinite, but I don't think anything else is.
dkdk999
[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="Diophage"]wow deep. Really that's an interesting point. It is interesting, and I have considered that also. We tend to think of the universe's infinity as infinite planets and stars and all that siht. But what if that ends and It's just eternal nothing. That seems very logical actually. What is "nothing" though? I think there is "something" and a "negative something" because opposition seems like a theme of the universe. idk :?Nothingness is infinite, but I don't think anything else is.
RisethNameless
[QUOTE="RisethNameless"][QUOTE="dkdk999"] wow deep. Really that's an interesting point. ZumaJones07It is interesting, and I have considered that also. We tend to think of the universe's infinity as infinite planets and stars and all that siht. But what if that ends and It's just eternal nothing. That seems very logical actually. What is "nothing" though? I think there is "something" and a "negative something" because opposition seems like a theme of the universe. idk :?A very good question; "What is nothing" Nothing is empty space in the context I put it in.
[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="Diophage"]wow deep. Really that's an interesting point. It is interesting, and I have considered that also. We tend to think of the universe's infinity as infinite planets and stars and all that siht. But what if that ends and It's just eternal nothing. That seems very logical actually. Why does that seem very logical?Nothingness is infinite, but I don't think anything else is.
RisethNameless
[QUOTE="RisethNameless"][QUOTE="dkdk999"] wow deep. Really that's an interesting point. chaoscougar1It is interesting, and I have considered that also. We tend to think of the universe's infinity as infinite planets and stars and all that siht. But what if that ends and It's just eternal nothing. That seems very logical actually. Why does that seem very logical?Because the if It's nothing then it can just keep going cant it? You don't need to think about where it ends because it doesn't. Whereas if you think of the universe having stuff like planets and whatnot occupying the space thoroughly then all you can think is "If It's infinite then where does all the stuff occupying it end, how much is there, can it really be infinite physically?" That's where the idea that all the stuff just ends somewhere and that could be thought of as the border of the universe. It might not be some sort of perfect circle with the contents of the universe inside it; Some things may reach further out into the nothing than others. But if there's a point where stuff just doesn't exist then it doesn't need to end. I'm not sure how much sense I'm making or how well I'm expressing my theory. Do you get what I'm saying?
Universe related stuff makes me wonder too many things like..: Is there is no oxygen in space how does the sun burn?
Universe related stuff makes me wonder too many things like..: Is there is no oxygen in space how does the sun burn?
tjricardo089
It converts 600,000,000 tonnes of hydrogen into helium per second
[QUOTE="JustPlainLucas"]No, there's a border out there somewhere. Eventually, it will collapse back in on itself, and the cycle begins anew.black_cat19
Actually, the guys that won this year's Nobel prize in physics figured out that the universe's expansion is actually accelerating, which suggests at some point everything in the universe will be so far apart all energy will dissipate and the universe will freeze and "die". And that'll be the end of it.
At least that's what I heard. :P
As much as I would like to agree, the origins of the universe are speculation at best and wild guesses at worst. I believe that is of the utmost importance when theorizing about the "final fate" of the universe, if there is such a thing.[QUOTE="tjricardo089"]
Universe related stuff makes me wonder too many things like..: Is there is no oxygen in space how does the sun burn?
chaoscougar1
It converts 600,000,000 tonnes of hydrogen into helium per second
Also, "burning" wouldn't be a proper term. It's hydrogen fusion.[QUOTE="tjricardo089"]
Universe related stuff makes me wonder too many things like..: Is there is no oxygen in space how does the sun burn?
chaoscougar1
It converts 600,000,000 tonnes of hydrogen into helium per second
Thanks, now I can get back to my normal life.
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]
[QUOTE="tjricardo089"]
Universe related stuff makes me wonder too many things like..: Is there is no oxygen in space how does the sun burn?
tjricardo089
It converts 600,000,000 tonnes of hydrogen into helium per second
Thanks, now I can get back to my normal life.
I would imagine that would be a lot slower...It's easier to imagine an infinite expanse, or an end past which there's nothingness? I think you'll find that they're both equally incomprehensible; fortunately our ability to imagine these things has no bearing on reality. Go Math and Physics!It's hard to imagine it not being infinite. If you get to the end, what's beyond that?
Jackc8
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment