Sorry. Next time, read the rules of the forum before you assume you know what you're talking about.So Technically speaking, I have violated no rules of the forums. Care to try again?
MOCHIRON_MAN
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Sorry. Next time, read the rules of the forum before you assume you know what you're talking about.So Technically speaking, I have violated no rules of the forums. Care to try again?
MOCHIRON_MAN
[QUOTE="yucky_straw"]Anyone who can type and use a computer can not be this stupid. You honestly can not believe what you just wrote. JandurinI have no idea what you are even talking about? Are you referring to the fact that I said that dogs can elicit sympathy? Yes. That dogs can elicit the same amount of sympathy from an abusive person as a human that is using spoken 'language'. A human understands psychology, reasoning, deception, and they can flat out lie to make their abuser stop. As a kid I watched the Halloween movies and thought 'if that was my uncle trying to kill me, I would just say "I love you!" and see if Micheal Myers would show sympathy and not kill me. Now, as a young child, that was my logic. A dog has no possible way to decieve a person into being sypathetic. Because they don't know how to lie or deceive. They just use their natural instincts to either fight or wimper. Which more than likely would cause a sick person, who wants to express power over another creature, to abuse them even more.
[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]Sorry. Next time, read the rules of the forum before you assume you know what you're talking about.So Technically speaking, I have violated no rules of the forums. Care to try again?
Jandurin
Oh ho! But I do know What I'm talking about. But can we please get back on track??
[QUOTE="FragStains"][QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]Yes. It's considered trolling/flaming.But, can you be moderated even though you actually did report him for a valid reason?
MOCHIRON_MAN
You have no idea how much I hate trolling, I had to resort to this to try and getthe other guys to stop. But can we get back to the subject?
I think the reason the conversation has devolved is because there is nothing left to intelligently discuss. All reputable points have been made multiple times and discussed by all parties. I think we should let this thread die...humanely. *snicker*Yes. That dogs can elicit the same amount of sympathy from an abusive person as a human that is using spoken 'language'. yucky_strawSo, you called me stupid because YOU assumed that I meant that dogs could elicit the SAME amount of sympathy? I just said they could elicit, not how much.
You have no idea how much I hate trolling, I had to resort to this to try and getthe other guys to stop. But can we get back to the subject?
MOCHIRON_MAN
What exactly is the topic? It's not discussion of opinions because you've already said that you would report anyone who tries to disagree/argue with you. If not that, what would 'getting back to the subject' be?
Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...abdelmessih101I couldn't disagree more.
This is the kind of crap that just puts me over the edge and makes me absolutely livid. I cannot stand animal abuse. It makes me sick.
I see animal abuse as similar to child abuse because in both events, the victims are nearly equally harmless and defenseless. It's not fair to attack a baby or an animal who simply wants your love. I'm not saying it's fair to attack a child or a person who can defend themselves, but they at least COULD have the upper hand, whereas a baby or a dog/cat/any other pet has less of a chance of defending themselves.
Animal abuse has always been an issue that I care strongly about. Ever since I was a little kid, I had very strong, well-formed opinions on the matter because I did the research and read up on it.
I hate reading stories like this. It makes me so irrationally angry. I am not a violent person at all, but stories like this make me want to go beat the crap out of the abuser.
[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]What exactly is the topic? It's not discussion of opinions because you've already said that you would report anyone who tries to disagree/argue with you. If not that, what would 'getting back to the subject' be?
LittleHands134
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...yucky_strawI couldn't disagree more. And so the thread ends, another dead end brought to you by OT. Thank you and good night!
If only the TC and the other guy could reason like this, this thread would be much shorter.I hate reading stories like this. It makes me so irrationally angry. I am not a violent person at all, but stories like this make me want to go beat the crap out of the abuser.
t3hrubikscube
[QUOTE="yucky_straw"]Yes. That dogs can elicit the same amount of sympathy from an abusive person as a human that is using spoken 'language'. JandurinSo, you called me stupid because YOU assumed that I meant that dogs could elicit the SAME amount of sympathy? I just said they could elicit, not how much. I didn't say YOU were stupid. Just your response. The noises from a suffering dog would make a normal person feel sympathetic. But we're talking about sick individuals who thrive on witnessing or hearing something suffer.
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="yucky_straw"]Yes. That dogs can elicit the same amount of sympathy from an abusive person as a human that is using spoken 'language'. yucky_strawSo, you called me stupid because YOU assumed that I meant that dogs could elicit the SAME amount of sympathy? I just said they could elicit, not how much. I didn't say YOU were stupid. Just your response. The noises from a suffering dog would make a normal person feel sympathetic. But we're talking about sick individuals who thrive on witnessing or hearing something suffer. What makes you think your hypothetical sick individual would listen to a human complaining any more than a dog whining?
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...yucky_strawI couldn't disagree more. Yeah, because dogs have feeling and people don't, right? Or maybe people deserve to be abused more than dogs? Or is it because dogs "can't defend themselves" and people can?
I hate reading stories like this. It makes me so irrationally angry. I am not a violent person at all, but stories like this make me want to go beat the crap out of the abuser.
If only the TC and the other guy could reason like this, this thread would be much shorter. Not sure what your point is but I don't really care about people making stupid jokes in this thread like the 'other guy'. This is GS. Lame jokes are bound to happen no matter what the topic.[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="t3hrubikscube"]If only the TC and the other guy could reason like this, this thread would be much shorter. Not sure what your point is but I don't really care about people making stupid jokes in this thread like the 'other guy'. This is GS. Lame jokes are bound to happen no matter what the topic.I hate reading stories like this. It makes me so irrationally angry. I am not a violent person at all, but stories like this make me want to go beat the crap out of the abuser.
yucky_straw
The "Other guy" Who is this "Other guy"? I'm guessing it is me, but I could care less, I'm just trying to make our little friends who think this is a joke to stop, becasue I'm about to say, What if this dog was yours? Yes. I just went there. Think about that, The next time you post something that you think is funny into this thread.
[QUOTE="yucky_straw"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...abdelmessih101I couldn't disagree more. Yeah, because dogs have feeling and people don't, right? Or maybe people deserve to be abused more than dogs? Or is it because dogs "can't defend themselves" and people can? Because if it were a person then maybe they deserved it? And by that I mean maybe they did something w/ a malicious or evil intention of hurting someone that was innocent. You can argue that maybe the dog hurt someone that was innocent but when animals act violently it is out of natural instinct. Their instincts are all that they know. A person can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape, and hate. Which are all acts of malice. No dog deserves to be beaten with a hammer no matter what they do. I can't say the same about a human.
If A) my dog hurt someone (like, really hurt them) and B) I didn't have the money to have it put down at a vet and C) I didn't want to let animal control come and make her (my dog) feel sad before she finally got put down... Well, I still wouldn't do it, because it's illegal and my dog is 70 pounds. That's a lot of animal waste. But you can see where I was going.The "Other guy" Who is this "Other guy"? I'm guessing it is me, but I could care less, I'm just trying to make our little friends who think this is a joke to stop, becasue I'm about to say, What if this dog was yours? Yes. I just went there. Think about that, The next time you post something that you think is funny into this thread.
MOCHIRON_MAN
What if this dog was yours? Yes. I just went there. Think about that, The next time you post something that you think is funny into this thread.
MOCHIRON_MAN
Why would it change anything? An opinion based on strong emotions (how someone would feel if this happened to their dog) is very biased.
[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]What if this dog was yours? Yes. I just went there. Think about that, The next time you post something that you think is funny into this thread.
LittleHands134
Why would it change anything? An opinion based on strong emotions (how someone would feel if this happened to their dog) is very biased.
its also bias to be so removed that you can feel no sympathy what-so-ever. the truest unbias comes from empathy, reflection and logic.[QUOTE="LittleHands134"][QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]What if this dog was yours? Yes. I just went there. Think about that, The next time you post something that you think is funny into this thread.
clembo1990
Why would it change anything? An opinion based on strong emotions (how someone would feel if this happened to their dog) is very biased.
its also bias to be so removed that you can feel no sympathy what-so-ever. the truest unbias comes from empathy, reflection and logic.But there is still no room to make jokes about something like this. Can you not understand that? Please stop making jokes here. If you want to make jokes about, make another topic that is devoted to it, or just blog it. This is not the time for that kind of thing.
Just a dog, I figure most of you are probably saying, "So unbelievably horrible, it's just a dog, that man deserved to be beaten to death with the hammer", bla bla bla. Sorry but I don't understand your extreme compassion for animals..and why this topic is popular.Solid_Snake325
[QUOTE="fbigent34"][QUOTE="Viking_1298"]Personally I'll only kill a dog if that dog is trying to kill me or someone else. Dogs are dogs but to choose an animal's life over a human life would make you a very evil and heartless person.NoSpeakyEnglish:| no one choosing the other over the other one. the fact of the matter people think it just an animal is disqusting beyond belif. and if you're going to kill an animal trying to protect itself you're just as bad :Why is it bad to save your life or another persons life if you have to kill a mutt? Wouldn't you kill a human who wanted to harm you or whoever you care about?
[QUOTE="yucky_straw"]This is not really a proper thread to make jokes in.JandurinWhen someone's father keeps them locked in a basement and rapes them and has children with them, jokes aren't acceptable. A dog surviving an asshat's attack is a different matter.
Its not a diffrent matter i think no matter what there shouldn't of been anyjokes in any threads of abuse, sexcual assulsted raped, murder or sudicdal etc... its wrong but that not going to stop people from being jerks.
Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...abdelmessih101
How is this any better being a animal? animal cannot defened itself or speak what happen unlike humans who can get help.
there a huge diffrence. aniaml is in a weak senrio not of its right
It is just a dog... Yet as we speak people are dying all around us. halo3-player
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"][QUOTE="yucky_straw"] I couldn't disagree more. yucky_strawYeah, because dogs have feeling and people don't, right? Or maybe people deserve to be abused more than dogs? Or is it because dogs "can't defend themselves" and people can? Because if it were a person then maybe they deserved it? And by that I mean maybe they did something w/ a malicious or evil intention of hurting someone that was innocent. You can argue that maybe the dog hurt someone that was innocent but when animals act violently it is out of natural instinct. Their instincts are all that they know. A person can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape, and hate. Which are all acts of malice. No dog deserves to be beaten with a hammer no matter what they do. I can't say the same about a human. Exactly my point - instincts are all they know, so what does it matter - they have no feeling. Again, not saying I condone violence at all, but I'll stand by my point that I'd rather this on an animal that can't be traumatized than a human who can. Humans > animals regardless of circumstance.
[QUOTE="LittleHands134"][QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]What if this dog was yours? Yes. I just went there. Think about that, The next time you post something that you think is funny into this thread.
clembo1990
Why would it change anything? An opinion based on strong emotions (how someone would feel if this happened to their dog) is very biased.
its also bias to be so removed that you can feel no sympathy what-so-ever. the truest unbias comes from empathy, reflection and logic. I disagree to some point. In my opinion, it seems like someone who is able to be completely disconnected to the situation and look at what ever happened without caring either way would be able to make a very unbiased decision. Especially in a situation like this where it would be deciding the punishment for someone.[QUOTE="yucky_straw"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"] Yeah, because dogs have feeling and people don't, right? Or maybe people deserve to be abused more than dogs? Or is it because dogs "can't defend themselves" and people can?abdelmessih101Because if it were a person then maybe they deserved it? And by that I mean maybe they did something w/ a malicious or evil intention of hurting someone that was innocent. You can argue that maybe the dog hurt someone that was innocent but when animals act violently it is out of natural instinct. Their instincts are all that they know. A person can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape, and hate. Which are all acts of malice. No dog deserves to be beaten with a hammer no matter what they do. I can't say the same about a human. Exactly my point - instincts are all they know, so what does it matter - they have no feeling. Again, not saying I condone violence at all, but I'll stand by my point that I'd rather this on an animal that can't be traumatized than a human who can. Humans > animals regardless of circumstance.
An animal that can't be traumatized? No. Animals can be Traumatized. you need to learn more about animals I suspect.
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...fbigent34
How is this any better being a animal? animal cannot defened itself or speak what happen unlike humans who can get help.
there a huge diffrence. aniaml is in a weak senrio not of its right
So you would rather see a human abused like this instead of a dog? Again, I don't condone violence at all - I'm just putting it in perspective.
And last time I checked, dogs can run faster than most people.
Exactly my point - instincts are all they know, so what does it matter - they have no feeling. Again, not saying I condone violence at all, but I'll stand by my point that I'd rather this on an animal that can't be traumatized than a human who can. Humans > animals regardless of circumstance.[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"][QUOTE="yucky_straw"] Because if it were a person then maybe they deserved it? And by that I mean maybe they did something w/ a malicious or evil intention of hurting someone that was innocent. You can argue that maybe the dog hurt someone that was innocent but when animals act violently it is out of natural instinct. Their instincts are all that they know. A person can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape, and hate. Which are all acts of malice. No dog deserves to be beaten with a hammer no matter what they do. I can't say the same about a human. MOCHIRON_MAN
An animal that can't be traumatized? No. Animals can be Traumatized. you need to learn more about animals I suspect.
Oh, I didn't mean it like that. I mean that it's much easier to help a dog with trauma than a person.[QUOTE="yucky_straw"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"] Yeah, because dogs have feeling and people don't, right? Or maybe people deserve to be abused more than dogs? Or is it because dogs "can't defend themselves" and people can?abdelmessih101Because if it were a person then maybe they deserved it? And by that I mean maybe they did something w/ a malicious or evil intention of hurting someone that was innocent. You can argue that maybe the dog hurt someone that was innocent but when animals act violently it is out of natural instinct. Their instincts are all that they know. A person can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape, and hate. Which are all acts of malice. No dog deserves to be beaten with a hammer no matter what they do. I can't say the same about a human. Exactly my point - instincts are all they know, so what does it matter - they have no feeling. Again, not saying I condone violence at all, but I'll stand by my point that I'd rather this on an animal that can't be traumatized than a human who can. Humans > animals regardless of circumstance. Um... I hate to be the one to tell you this... but animals have feelings (physical and emotional), and they can be traumatized. When dogs are aggressive from being chained/tethered or abused, it's because they are traumatized. This dog will probably always have a fear of unfamiliar humans because it's traumatized from being slammed in the eye with a hammer.
[QUOTE="fbigent34"] [QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...abdelmessih101
How is this any better being a animal? animal cannot defened itself or speak what happen unlike humans who can get help.
there a huge diffrence. aniaml is in a weak senrio not of its right
So you would rather see a human abused like this instead of a dog? Again, I don't condone violence at all - I'm just putting it in perspective.
And last time I checked, dogs can run faster than most people.
I rather see none. but to say you rather see it on a animal is wrong. where a human can actually fight back... your perspetvice bite..[QUOTE="fbigent34"] [QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]Not saying I condone this, but better an animal than a human being...abdelmessih101
How is this any better being a animal? animal cannot defened itself or speak what happen unlike humans who can get help.
there a huge diffrence. aniaml is in a weak senrio not of its right
So you would rather see a human abused like this instead of a dog? Again, I don't condone violence at all - I'm just putting it in perspective.
And last time I checked, dogs can run faster than most people.
Yah well eve though a dog can run faster, it will eventually think that the attacker won't give up, then just stop running and give in. Besides, why should a dog have to run when the subject person does not absolutely need to attack it?
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"][QUOTE="yucky_straw"] Because if it were a person then maybe they deserved it? And by that I mean maybe they did something w/ a malicious or evil intention of hurting someone that was innocent. You can argue that maybe the dog hurt someone that was innocent but when animals act violently it is out of natural instinct. Their instincts are all that they know. A person can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape, and hate. Which are all acts of malice. No dog deserves to be beaten with a hammer no matter what they do. I can't say the same about a human. yucky_strawExactly my point - instincts are all they know, so what does it matter - they have no feeling. Again, not saying I condone violence at all, but I'll stand by my point that I'd rather this on an animal that can't be traumatized than a human who can. Humans > animals regardless of circumstance. Um... I hate to be the one to tell you this... but animals have feelings (physical and emotional), and they can be traumatized. When dogs are aggressive from being chained/tethered or abused, it's because they are traumatized. This dog will probably always have a fear of unfamiliar humans because it's traumatized from being slammed in the eye with a hammer. Nevermind - I knew they can be traumatized but that's not what I meant. I meant that it's much easier to train a dog out of trauma than a human.
[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"] Exactly my point - instincts are all they know, so what does it matter - they have no feeling. Again, not saying I condone violence at all, but I'll stand by my point that I'd rather this on an animal that can't be traumatized than a human who can. Humans > animals regardless of circumstance.abdelmessih101
An animal that can't be traumatized? No. Animals can be Traumatized. you need to learn more about animals I suspect.
Oh, I didn't mean it like that. I mean that it's much easier to help a dog with trauma than a person.Ohhh, ok, And yah this is true that a dog can be helped much easier when it is traumatized. excessive time with it, and just staying with it can really make a difference. I mean dogs are people too, just in a different form. but they deserve equal to humans, and in some cases, better.
How is this any better being a animal? animal cannot defened itself or speak what happen unlike humans who can get help.
there a huge diffrence. aniaml is in a weak senrio not of its right
So you would rather see a human abused like this instead of a dog? Again, I don't condone violence at all - I'm just putting it in perspective.
And last time I checked, dogs can run faster than most people.
Yah well eve though a dog can run faster, it will eventually think that the attacker won't give up, then just stop running and give in. Besides, why should a dog have to run when the subject person does not absolutely need to attack it?
To end this argument, let me ask you this one question. Regardless of the circumstances, would you rather see a dog needlessly in pain or a human being needlessly in pain? ... no one likes to see either one (myself included), but I would still pick the animal every time if it had to happen.[QUOTE="yucky_straw"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"] Yeah, because dogs have feeling and people don't, right? Or maybe people deserve to be abused more than dogs? Or is it because dogs "can't defend themselves" and people can?abdelmessih101Because if it were a person then maybe they deserved it? And by that I mean maybe they did something w/ a malicious or evil intention of hurting someone that was innocent. You can argue that maybe the dog hurt someone that was innocent but when animals act violently it is out of natural instinct. Their instincts are all that they know. A person can lie, steal, cheat, murder, rape, and hate. Which are all acts of malice. No dog deserves to be beaten with a hammer no matter what they do. I can't say the same about a human. Exactly my point - instincts are all they know, so what does it matter - they have no feeling. Again, not saying I condone violence at all, but I'll stand by my point that I'd rather this on an animal that can't be traumatized than a human who can. Humans > animals regardless of circumstance.
abdelmessih101 is right, though you cannot tell, you have to understand what he is saying, and I do, he is right.
I mean dogs are people too, just in a different form. but they deserve equal to humans, and in some cases, better. MOCHIRON_MAN
[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]So you would rather see a human abused like this instead of a dog? Again, I don't condone violence at all - I'm just putting it in perspective.
And last time I checked, dogs can run faster than most people.
abdelmessih101
Yah well eve though a dog can run faster, it will eventually think that the attacker won't give up, then just stop running and give in. Besides, why should a dog have to run when the subject person does not absolutely need to attack it?
To end this argument, let me ask you this one question. Regardless of the circumstances, would you rather see a dog needlessly in pain or a human being needlessly in pain? ... no one likes to see either one (myself included), but I would still pick the animal every time if it had to happen.i pick humans they deserve it animals don't
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"][QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]Oh, I didn't mean it like that. I mean that it's much easier to help a dog with trauma than a person.An animal that can't be traumatized? No. Animals can be Traumatized. you need to learn more about animals I suspect.
MOCHIRON_MAN
Ohhh, ok, And yah this is true that a dog can be helped much easier when it is traumatized. excessive time with it, and just staying with it can really make a difference. I mean dogs are people too, just in a different form. but they deserve equal to humans, and in some cases, better.
I disagree 100% - when it comes to humans vs animals, I would pick humans every time. I'm not saying we should be able to treat animals however we want, but I'd sacrifice an animal life for a human life every time. And I would sacrifice an animal's comfort for a human's comfort every time.
[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"]So you would rather see a human abused like this instead of a dog? Again, I don't condone violence at all - I'm just putting it in perspective.
And last time I checked, dogs can run faster than most people.
abdelmessih101
Yah well eve though a dog can run faster, it will eventually think that the attacker won't give up, then just stop running and give in. Besides, why should a dog have to run when the subject person does not absolutely need to attack it?
To end this argument, let me ask you this one question. Regardless of the circumstances, would you rather see a dog needlessly in pain or a human being needlessly in pain? ... no one likes to see either one (myself included), but I would still pick the animal every time if it had to happen.To answer your question, [ This will be a shocker ] I would rather see the human suffer. Why? Because humans have dished out the most pain of all the creatures that we can physically see on this planet. most of which the pain is toward other humans, in the form of wars, bloody disputes, and other means, And they have inflicted the most pain against animals as well. Compared to inflictions of pain borught on by humans, attacks from animals, is almost nothing.
[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"][QUOTE="abdelmessih101"] Oh, I didn't mean it like that. I mean that it's much easier to help a dog with trauma than a person.abdelmessih101
Ohhh, ok, And yah this is true that a dog can be helped much easier when it is traumatized. excessive time with it, and just staying with it can really make a difference. I mean dogs are people too, just in a different form. but they deserve equal to humans, and in some cases, better.
I disagree 100% - when it comes to humans vs animals, I would pick humans every time. I'm not saying we should be able to treat animals however we want, but I'd sacrifice an animal life for a human life every time. And I would sacrifice an animal's comfort for a human's comfort every time.
In the end, Animals deserve better than this.
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"][QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]To end this argument, let me ask you this one question. Regardless of the circumstances, would you rather see a dog needlessly in pain or a human being needlessly in pain? ... no one likes to see either one (myself included), but I would still pick the animal every time if it had to happen.Yah well eve though a dog can run faster, it will eventually think that the attacker won't give up, then just stop running and give in. Besides, why should a dog have to run when the subject person does not absolutely need to attack it?
tony2077ca
i pick humans they deserve it animals don't
WOW, I can't believe someone would actually pick animals :| - you do know what "needlessly" means, right?[QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"] I mean dogs are people too, just in a different form. but they deserve equal to humans, and in some cases, better. LittleHands134
Could I eat a dog if I wanted to? If not, would the same equality also apply to cows, chicken, and pigs?
Of course you can eat a dog if you wanted to, China does it, so why can't you? Of course there's laws keeping you from doing this, but what simple law will stop you from eating it? I find it disgusting that people would do it, but they do. So if you want to, Then fly at it. Because I am not going to stop you.
[QUOTE="abdelmessih101"][QUOTE="MOCHIRON_MAN"]To end this argument, let me ask you this one question. Regardless of the circumstances, would you rather see a dog needlessly in pain or a human being needlessly in pain? ... no one likes to see either one (myself included), but I would still pick the animal every time if it had to happen.Yah well eve though a dog can run faster, it will eventually think that the attacker won't give up, then just stop running and give in. Besides, why should a dog have to run when the subject person does not absolutely need to attack it?
MOCHIRON_MAN
To answer your question, [ This will be a shocker ] I would rather see the human suffer. Why? Because humans have dished out the most pain of all the creatures that we can physically see on this planet. most of which the pain is toward other humans, in the form of wars, bloody disputes, and other means, And they have inflicted the most pain against animals as well. Compared to inflictions of pain borught on by humans, attacks from animals, is almost nothing.
So innocent human vs innocent animal, and you would rather see the human suffer!? Are you sure? :?:?:?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment