[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"]With all due respect here, it is not about you. It's about the bigger picture. So even though you feel as if homosexuality should be a way of life and kids should learn it, the majority of people do not, and just because the majority doesn't believe in it doesn't mean that they don't believe in equal rights because they're still people and they deserve equal rights. Not believing in gay marriage is not bigotry because it's defined between a man and woman so they're not saying they don't believe in equal rights to gay couples and because of that, people accept homosexuality in today's society. Qooroo
With all due respect, the interests of the majority means exactly nothing in this context.
Yes, this is about the bigger picture. Not beliving in gay marriage is bigotry because it is giving the finger to equal rights. I don't care why you think that, that's how it is. You country, like mine, has this fun little sheet of paper calls the constitution that promises equal rights. It's also nifty in that is superscedes the majority's will.
Civil unions create a different but equal situation.
Different but equal is not equal according to the constitution. It doesn't matter what the motivation for the difference is. Civil unions are different than marriages but supposedly equal in effect. Therefore giving homosexual couples civil union priveleges but not marriage priveleges is unconstitutional.
The constitution superscedes the majority.
This is a fairly straightforward issue.
Wrong. Not believing in gay marriage is not bigotry because it isn't saying no to gay lifestyle or equal gay rights. Again, the "separate but equal" argument, even from the constitution is a terrible example because a. At the time, things were "separate but unequal" due to white hating blacks. b. Reasons for equal rights being separate here are completely different(reasons not due to hate) and it's separation on a piece of paper. Gays get equal rights and it's still a government for the people.
Log in to comment