Don't we already have equal marriage rights?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Devour2Survive
Devour2Survive

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#251 Devour2Survive
Member since 2008 • 782 Posts
[QUOTE="Devour2Survive"]Good, then don't get married in a church and nobody will have a problem with it.GabuEx
Except for, in most states, the law, as well as a majority of the population.

Nobody will have a problem with gays not being allowed to get married. What are you talking about majority of the population? Is that why it's against the law in almost every state.
Avatar image for Thessassin
Thessassin

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#252 Thessassin
Member since 2007 • 1819 Posts
So, your problem is not gays getting married, but the word marriage being redefined? English is the most commonly used language in the world and its constantly changing, so get over it. If a word has to be redefined to grant equal rights then who the hell cares? It's just a word. Words have no meaning unless we give them one.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#253 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"][QUOTE="Devour2Survive"]Good, then don't get married in a church and nobody will have a problem with it.Devour2Survive
Except for, in most states, the law, as well as a majority of the population.

Nobody will have a problem with gays not being allowed to get married. What are you talking about majority of the population? Is that why it's against the law in almost every state.

I don't really know what you're saying here.
Avatar image for Devour2Survive
Devour2Survive

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 Devour2Survive
Member since 2008 • 782 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"][QUOTE="Devour2Survive"][QUOTE="GabuEx"] Except for, in most states, the law, as well as a majority of the population.

Nobody will have a problem with gays not being allowed to get married. What are you talking about majority of the population? Is that why it's against the law in almost every state.

I don't really know what you're saying here.

I'm saying, same sex marriage shouldn't be allowed and most people agree with me.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#255 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="Devour2Survive"] I'm saying, same sex marriage shouldn't be allowed and most people agree with me.

*awaits Funky_Llama's argumentum ad populum link*
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#256 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts
I'm saying, same sex marriage shouldn't be allowed and most people agree with me. Devour2Survive
And this is a reason why I should agree with you?
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#257 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] How does a child who is exposed to a family with two moms or two dads constitute as a bad thing? Are their children going to suddenly turn gay from seeing that? What is this mass recall of school text books? Do you have any evidence of any of that? -Sun_Tzu-

Turns out we're having dinner at my house so I have a little while longer. It's a bad thing because a belief in something would be forced upon children whose parents wouldn't want them to learn about. A lot of schools have required health/life courses that teach about marriage(fiscal reasons and life skills) and long term relationships. Here's some evidence.

Education Code Section 51933:

(7) Instruction and materials shall teach respect for marriage and committed relationships.

Oh no, children are going to respect marriage and committed relationships, whatever will we do...I don't see any negatives to that. God forbid we try to teach tolerance...

Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.
Avatar image for Devour2Survive
Devour2Survive

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 Devour2Survive
Member since 2008 • 782 Posts
[QUOTE="Devour2Survive"]I'm saying, same sex marriage shouldn't be allowed and most people agree with me. GabuEx
And this is a reason why I should agree with you?

I don't know where you got that from. I couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not, I don't know you so I don't care. Though don't try to make me feel that I'm wrong or I should be ashamed for not accepting same sex marriage.
Avatar image for -Jiggles-
-Jiggles-

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 -Jiggles-
Member since 2008 • 4356 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"][QUOTE="Devour2Survive"] Nobody will have a problem with gays not being allowed to get married. What are you talking about majority of the population? Is that why it's against the law in almost every state.Devour2Survive
I don't really know what you're saying here.

I'm saying, same sex marriage shouldn't be allowed and most people agree with me.

So just because the majority agrees on something automatically makes it right?

Practically everybody back in the 15th & 16th century found it appropriate to burn so-called "witches" at the stake; does that make them right?

Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#260 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

Majority of parents didn't want blacks to have equal rights back in the day, too.
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts

[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"]With all due respect here, it is not about you. It's about the bigger picture. So even though you feel as if homosexuality should be a way of life and kids should learn it, the majority of people do not, and just because the majority doesn't believe in it doesn't mean that they don't believe in equal rights because they're still people and they deserve equal rights. Not believing in gay marriage is not bigotry because it's defined between a man and woman so they're not saying they don't believe in equal rights to gay couples and because of that, people accept homosexuality in today's society. Qooroo

With all due respect, the interests of the majority means exactly nothing in this context.

Yes, this is about the bigger picture. Not beliving in gay marriage is bigotry because it is giving the finger to equal rights. I don't care why you think that, that's how it is. You country, like mine, has this fun little sheet of paper calls the constitution that promises equal rights. It's also nifty in that is superscedes the majority's will.

Civil unions create a different but equal situation.

Different but equal is not equal according to the constitution. It doesn't matter what the motivation for the difference is. Civil unions are different than marriages but supposedly equal in effect. Therefore giving homosexual couples civil union priveleges but not marriage priveleges is unconstitutional.

The constitution superscedes the majority.

This is a fairly straightforward issue.

Wrong. Not believing in gay marriage is not bigotry because it isn't saying no to gay lifestyle or equal gay rights. Again, the "separate but equal" argument, even from the constitution is a terrible example because a. At the time, things were "separate but unequal" due to white hating blacks. b. Reasons for equal rights being separate here are completely different(reasons not due to hate) and it's separation on a piece of paper. Gays get equal rights and it's still a government for the people.
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#262 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
"Go ahead and get married," I say to the gays. "But don't interfere with the church's right to refuse to marry each other in the process." ;)
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

And again we come back to this idea of creating laws and statutes based on their popularity.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#264 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts
Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.LikeHaterade
There were probably a majority of parents in Southern states that didn't want segregation to end.
Avatar image for Devour2Survive
Devour2Survive

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#265 Devour2Survive
Member since 2008 • 782 Posts

[QUOTE="Devour2Survive"][QUOTE="GabuEx"] I don't really know what you're saying here.-Jiggles-

I'm saying, same sex marriage shouldn't be allowed and most people agree with me.

So just because the majority agrees on something automatically makes it right?

Practically everybody back in the 15th & 16th century found it appropriate to burn so-called "witches" at the stake; does that make them right?

If that is what the people want.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#266 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts
"Go ahead and get married," I say to the gays. "But don't interfere with the church's right to refuse to marry each other in the process." ;)battlefront23
Which is fine, and I don't think anyone supports forcing churches to marry people they don't want to marry.
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#267 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

Majority of parents didn't want blacks to have equal rights back in the day, too.

This has to do with parenting and what their children learn. Not racial/sexual orientation condemnation. Sorry.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#268 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

If that is what the people want.

Devour2Survive

Are you familiar with this thing called the Constitution? :P

Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#269 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

Majority of parents didn't want blacks to have equal rights back in the day, too.

This has to do with parenting and what their children learn. Not racial/sexual orientation condemnation. Sorry.

Why would they care if the kids learned about homosexual relationships if they didn't think they were in some way bad?
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

And again we come back to this idea of creating laws and statutes based on their popularity.

Yes, at the expense of what parent's children must learn because the minority said so?? Doesn't seem right to me.
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#271 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"] Majority of parents didn't want blacks to have equal rights back in the day, too.

This has to do with parenting and what their children learn. Not racial/sexual orientation condemnation. Sorry.

Why would they care if the kids learned about homosexual relationships if they didn't think they were in some way bad?

Parents have a problem with their kids learning it in school, especially at younger ages. Homosexuality is something that kids can learn on their own, and not forced for kids to learn when the majority is against it.
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#272 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

And again we come back to this idea of creating laws and statutes based on their popularity.

Yes, at the expense of what parent's children must learn because the minority said so?? Doesn't seem right to me.

education should not be governed by majority opinion. If the majority wished to put creationism in school, it wouldn't make it any less of a lie that you were teaching them. And pretending homosexuality doesn't exist is doing no good to anybody.
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#273 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"] Which is fine, and I don't think anyone supports forcing churches to marry people they don't want to marry.

I heard news of gay activists terrorizing churches for speaking out against homosexuality. That's what I have a problem with; the church should have the right to say whatever the heck they want without fear of gays attacking them, whether verbally or physically.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#274 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Yes, at the expense of what parent's children must learn because the minority said so?? Doesn't seem right to me.LikeHaterade

There's this little thing called the Constitution; its entire purpose is to make the minority win when the majority tries to walk on them. Arguing that the majority's will must be done is quite possibly one of the most un-American things that someone could say.

Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#275 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] This has to do with parenting and what their children learn. Not racial/sexual orientation condemnation. Sorry.

Why would they care if the kids learned about homosexual relationships if they didn't think they were in some way bad?

Parents have a problem with their kids learning it in school, especially at younger ages. Homosexuality is something that kids can learn on their own, and not forced for kids to learn when the majority is against it.

you did not answer my question at all. Why would they have a problem with kids learning something if they didn't believe it to be in some way bad?
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#276 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] How does a child who is exposed to a family with two moms or two dads constitute as a bad thing? Are their children going to suddenly turn gay from seeing that? What is this mass recall of school text books? Do you have any evidence of any of that? -Sun_Tzu-

Turns out we're having dinner at my house so I have a little while longer. It's a bad thing because a belief in something would be forced upon children whose parents wouldn't want them to learn about. A lot of schools have required health/life courses that teach about marriage(fiscal reasons and life skills) and long term relationships. Here's some evidence.

Education Code Section 51933:

(7) Instruction and materials shall teach respect for marriage and committed relationships.

Oh no, children are going to respect marriage and committed relationships, whatever will we do...I don't see any negatives to that. God forbid we try to teach tolerance...

It's negative because it's forcing parents' children to learn something in school at younger ages that a lot of parents may not believe in when they may learn it on their own whenever they mature. The minority doesn't get to decide what's best for what kids learn in school pertaining to relationships and lifestyle.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#277 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I heard news of gay activists terrorizing churches for speaking out against homosexuality. That's what I have a problem with; the church should have the right to say whatever the heck they want without fear of gays attacking them, whether verbally or physically.battlefront23

There are idiots and extremists in every group. When gay marriage was legalized nationwide in Canada, churches were perfectly free to refuse to marry same-sex couples, just as they're free to refuse to marry opposite-sex couples. I have no doubt that the same thing would be true if it were legalized in America.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#278 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
There are idiots and extremists in every group. When gay marriage was legalized nationwide in Canada, churches were perfectly free to refuse to marry same-sex couples, just as they're free to refuse to marry opposite-sex couples. I have no doubt that the same thing would be true if it were legalized in America.

 

GabuEx
But I heard that if a pastor speaks out against it in Canada, he is arrested. :| May not be true, but if it is, that's utterly ridiculous.
Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#279 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"]Why would they care if the kids learned about homosexual relationships if they didn't think they were in some way bad?Mr_sprinkles
Parents have a problem with their kids learning it in school, especially at younger ages. Homosexuality is something that kids can learn on their own, and not forced for kids to learn when the majority is against it.

you did not answer my question at all. Why would they have a problem with kids learning something if they didn't believe it to be in some way bad?

They believe it to be immoral. That's a perfectly good reason for parents not wanting their kids to learn about it in school when they can learn it on their own. It isn't bigotry because it doesn't mean they're saying NO to gay lifestyle in society and it doesn't mean they don't believe in equal rights. I'm going out to dinner so I'll be back soon.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#280 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

Majority of parents didn't want blacks to have equal rights back in the day, too.

This has to do with parenting and what their children learn. Not racial/sexual orientation condemnation. Sorry.

So if the majority of parents want the schools to teach their kids about Cleavland Steamers, that'd make it right?
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#281 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts
But I heard that if a pastor speaks out against it in Canada, he is arrested. :| May not be true, but if it is, that's utterly ridiculous. battlefront23
Uh, no, that is not true.
Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]There are idiots and extremists in every group. When gay marriage was legalized nationwide in Canada, churches were perfectly free to refuse to marry same-sex couples, just as they're free to refuse to marry opposite-sex couples. I have no doubt that the same thing would be true if it were legalized in America.

 

battlefront23
But I heard that if a pastor speaks out against it in Canada, he is arrested. :| May not be true, but if it is, that's utterly ridiculous.

there was a case where a marriage licensee for civil marriages refused a same-sex marriage because of his religion.  They ruled that if he wants to be backed by the church to turn in his civil marriage certificate and get a religious one.
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#283 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
[QUOTE="battlefront23"]But I heard that if a pastor speaks out against it in Canada, he is arrested. :| May not be true, but if it is, that's utterly ridiculous. GabuEx
Uh, no, that is not true.

That's good. I'm just afraid it will get to that point eventually, everywhere...
Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#284 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Parents have a problem with their kids learning it in school, especially at younger ages. Homosexuality is something that kids can learn on their own, and not forced for kids to learn when the majority is against it.LikeHaterade
you did not answer my question at all. Why would they have a problem with kids learning something if they didn't believe it to be in some way bad?

They believe it to be immoral. That's a perfectly good reason for parents not wanting their kids to learn about it in school when they can learn it on their own. It isn't bigotry because it doesn't mean they're saying NO to gay lifestyle in society and it doesn't mean they don't believe in equal rights. I'm going out to dinner so I'll be back soon.

same could be said about colored people... 

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#285 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="LikeHaterade"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="LikeHaterade"] Again, it's not about you. The majority of parents don't want it, therefor would be wrong to do so.

And again we come back to this idea of creating laws and statutes based on their popularity.

Yes, at the expense of what parent's children must learn because the minority said so?? Doesn't seem right to me.

We are talking about teaching tolerance in schools. We're not talking about teaching children how to be gay and how being gay is "fabulous". Tell me one negative aspect there is for a child learning to respect the gay community, just one. Catering only to the majority leads to mob rule. I don't know about you but mob rule does not sound appealing.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#286 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

That's good. I'm just afraid it will get to that point eventually, everywhere...battlefront23

Well, as gay marriage becomes more common and people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result, I have a strong feeling that opposition to gay marriage will become like opposition to interracial marriage... but that's more a social thing than a legal thing.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#287 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
same could be said about colored people...

 

links136
I see this argument a lot and I don't think it works. Homosexuals aren't born homosexual, I repeat, they are not born homosexual. First off, sexual tendencies aren't created when you're born... And secondly, they've yet to find a gene saying homosexuals are that way.
Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#288 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts
[QUOTE="links136"]same could be said about colored people...

 

battlefront23

I see this argument a lot and I don't think it works. Homosexuals aren't born homosexual, I repeat, they are not born homosexual. First off, sexual tendencies aren't created when you're born... And secondly, they've yet to find a gene saying homosexuals are that way.

 

Is there a gene that says someone is straight? 

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#289 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
... people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result... GabuEx
But the core of a country is the family. If you tamper with the family by allowing two of the same gender to have children, it messes up the kid's concept of a mother and a father, thus interfering the core of that country. Kids (usually) need both parents to be successful in life... Not two mothers or two fathers.
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="links136"]same could be said about colored people...

 

battlefront23
I see this argument a lot and I don't think it works. Homosexuals aren't born homosexual, I repeat, they are not born homosexual. First off, sexual tendencies aren't created when you're born... And secondly, they've yet to find a gene saying homosexuals are that way.

just because you're not born with it doesn't mean it's a choice.
Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]... people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result... battlefront23
But the core of a country is the family. If you tamper with the family by allowing two of the same gender to have children, it messes up the kid's concept of a mother and a father, thus interfering the core of that country. Kids (usually) need both parents to be successful in life... Not two mothers or two fathers.

being that half of them divorce...... 

Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#292 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]... people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result... battlefront23
But the core of a country is the family. If you tamper with the family by allowing two of the same gender to have children, it messes up the kid's concept of a mother and a father, thus interfering the core of that country. Kids (usually) need both parents to be successful in life... Not two mothers or two fathers.

And what of children of single parents?
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]... people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result... battlefront23
But the core of a country is the family. If you tamper with the family by allowing two of the same gender to have children, it messes up the kid's concept of a mother and a father, thus interfering the core of that country. Kids (usually) need both parents to be successful in life... Not two mothers or two fathers.

prove it? Just because thats the way it is doesn't mean it's the only way to work. seriously, I'd like to know where you got the bolded from.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#294 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I see this argument a lot and I don't think it works. Homosexuals aren't born homosexual, I repeat, they are not born homosexual. First off, sexual tendencies aren't created when you're born... And secondly, they've yet to find a gene saying homosexuals are that way. battlefront23

They've done studies on the brain patterns of homosexual people and heterosexual people. What they found is that the brains of homosexual men are similar to those of heterosexual women. This would indicate that, far from it being a choice, the brains of gay people are fundamentally different than the brains of their heterosexual counterparts, and that, if we were wanting to change a person's sexual preference, we would need to effectively perform a full lobotomy.

Whether this is due to birth or due to something that happens at a very young age during early brain development, the fact remains that all the evidence indicates that homosexuality is neither a choice nor something that can be changed, but is rather a fundamental part of a person's very being.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#295 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
Is there a gene that says someone is straight?

 

links136
Did I say that there was? I'm just saying the whole "They were born with it" just doesn't work... A lot of times, a kid's sense or concept of "sex" was tampered with early on, (many different ways) and although a boy may have felt a sudden attraction to one of his male friends, that doesn't mean he's gay and our society and media is shoving it down these kids throats that they are. It's frustrating...
Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#296 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts
[QUOTE="links136"]Is there a gene that says someone is straight?

 

battlefront23

Did I say that there was? I'm just saying the whole "They were born with it" just doesn't work... A lot of times, a kid's sense or concept of "sex" was tampered with early on, (many different ways) and although a boy may have felt a sudden attraction to one of his male friends, that doesn't mean he's gay and our society and media is shoving it down these kids throats that they are. It's frustrating...

back that up 

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#297 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]... people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result... battlefront23
But the core of a country is the family. If you tamper with the family by allowing two of the same gender to have children, it messes up the kid's concept of a mother and a father, thus interfering the core of that country. Kids (usually) need both parents to be successful in life... Not two mothers or two fathers.

Yeah, I hear this argument a lot, but it makes no sense. Allowing gay people to marry does not exactly do anything to prevent heterosexual people from marrying. Nor does it change the fact that only a man and a woman can create children. We allow infertile people to marry, as we allow people who do not desire children to marry. And we allow people to have children without being married. There is absolutely nothing confusing about allowing gay people to marry that is not already in place through these other facts.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#298 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="GabuEx"] Hence why I put usually...
[QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]... people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result... Mr_sprinkles
But the core of a country is the family. If you tamper with the family by allowing two of the same gender to have children, it messes up the kid's concept of a mother and a father, thus interfering the core of that country. Kids (usually) need both parents to be successful in life... Not two mothers or two fathers.

prove it? Just because thats the way it is doesn't mean it's the only way to work. seriously, I'd like to know where you got the bolded from.

Look at all of the successful people we've seen in our world. How many had both parents when they grew up? Even Obama, who only had a single mom, had a father figure in his life with his grandfather.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#299 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]... people realize that the fabric of society has not, in fact, fallen apart as a result... battlefront23
But the core of a country is the family. If you tamper with the family by allowing two of the same gender to have children, it messes up the kid's concept of a mother and a father, thus interfering the core of that country. Kids (usually) need both parents to be successful in life... Not two mothers or two fathers.

You're spewing baseless speculation. What is going to happen if a child is raised by two mothers or two fathers if they are capable of raising a child and giving the child an opportunity to live a successful life? I live in Connecticut, which just recently allowed gays to marry. The sky isn't falling over here. Families aren't being destroyed. Men haven't stopped loving their wives. Women haven't stopped loving their husbands. Everything is going fine, the core of the state hasn't been interfered with.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#300 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Look at all of the successful people we've seen in our world. How many had both parents when they grew up? Even Obama, who only had a single mom, had a father figure in his life with his grandfather.battlefront23

Right, so we should make divorce illegal... yes?